are The Palace girls really so cavalier with regard to safety, or is this guy so full of shit his eyes are brown?

There are plenty of dumb hobbiest out there and plenty of old or desperate providers. All low priced and high priced girls will say the same thing. "Men always want to go bareback." I guess they don't read much...think Magic and Charlie.

three of these four girls, his claims seem a little specious to me.  Its not uncommon for some douches that are DENIED BBFS to claim publicly in a review that they DID get it as retaliation in order to cause a girl problems with future customers who may think the menu is more open than it really is. Its why we lose some girls who retreat to other cities, change their names and start over.  I have said before that its my belief that about 50-60% of Kgirls are YMMV on BBFS, but I never heard of a guy getting it on the first appointment four girls in a row.  It lacks credibility in my mind.  I could be wrong, but I don't think so.

I have seen people falsely claim bbfs only to be called out for being completely wrong, even to the point where someone was blacklisted for attempting it because of the false claim. Either way risks increase.

If you're thinking about BBFS ...

I agree with the douche description, but would preface it with "misogynistic" since he seems to fancy himself a pretty rough guy when dealing with the those unable to do much to defend themsel ves. If any of that shit were true it's too bad the org likely couldn't or wouldn't go upside his head...

she and her palace are like outsiders.   in the past the other bookers wouldnt accept palace refernceces.

koreans are pretty racist. think blacks whites are diseased.  no way they give bbfs to non koreans at 50%.  even korean guys have a hard time these days.

He's not saying there's a 50% success rate. He's saying half the girls are very selective, and might consider it for the right guy. There are at least a couple girls on OP's review list who are this way.

Palace screening is too relax. Most bookers will not accept them for this main reason.

No. The bookers take their screening very seriously in this part of the world  (LA). Personally,  I am glad that they do. So when they don't trust another booker or organization, they will not accept the reference...regardless of how well behaved the client was. It's a pretty closed system. Tough to break in to, but well worth the effort.  (See the previous threads on this topic).

clarification, which is correct the way you state it.  I agree with Dance that only about 10% of girls have BBFS on their regular menu, but there are many more that are YMMV.  Hence, my estimate of 50% that may be doing it with SOMEBODY.

Reviewer "unzipped and pulled my already hard cock and balls out" before entering door. Exposing oneself in public is a brilliant idea (sarcasm). IMO review was BS.

Just like they think korean guys dont have aids.  Never Said kgirls were medically smart.

I agree with you. Sounds like B/S. However, I don't understand why anyone would go bareback knowing the risks! I guess he was smoking non-filter cigarettes too. 1000'ways to die and to kill your wife/girlfriend also.

I read some post off other site some dude booked Pepsi but Emmy answered the door. Pepsi was hiding in bathroom and wound up having threesome for price of one. Beyond imagination. IMO, another BS.

These things happen. On two occasions I've had a nice Kgirl just hop on board without a condom. Very first time came as a bit of a shock (she didn't ask), but once that threshold was crossed, why bother changing course. The second girl asked me "You want condom now?" and I jokingly said "Nah" and then she just took that literally. No regrets in either case (not going to lie, it felt amazing), but I'd still urge everyone to always err on the side of safety with using condoms and regular STD tests.