looks like this new startup is expanding, there is a new kd starting Friday, besides the current 5' petite gem

This post sounds like an ad, if Im fully honest. These allowed before Friday?

Over the years I've always learned about the new agencies through the grapevine and back channel -- or when I notices some review that has some place I've never heard of.

You guys don't have Nova orgs using switter? Do they advertise anywhere? In the bay I know if/when there's a new org in two days tops.

Excuse my non California SPEAK ignorance .
What is DMV

DC-MD-VA (DMV) demand is strong and supply is low.  They should do well.  

found the new girl's previous reviews
one of the review mentioned she looks like Miss Korea Lee Hanee

DC/MD/VA.

So why not tell people publicly under what name her previous reviews could be found?

Did you even bother search, research ? If you did image search you then knew she uses the same name Seven in Boston and CA!

Her previous reviews are under the name "Seven", and I believe she has an average rating of 7.29 for Looks, and maybe 7.71 for Performance.

I did not do any search. You're the one who mentioned her reviews under old name....

Thank you sir.

Google haneul Kim hee jeong lingerie set

https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/detail/tessa-review-by-karnage187-2224310

LOL

"Nice to have it just put out in the public for everyone to know about from the start. That way more of those who review will be aware and good info will follow."

I neither condoned or approved anything related to the pictures.

This is absolute nonsense - how was my comment harmful? I am simply stating the fucking truth. These pics arent her.

I'm sorry, but I'm fucking livid here. Some of you actually think that pointing out someone is using fake model pics is "harmful" and "worthless" ?  

While I’ll agree it was odd to characterize your comment as harmful, it does seem you’re overreacting.  Two replies saying essentially the same thing? “Livid”?  You might want to lighten up a little bit.

Sorry, I take this too seriously to lighten up. And my second comment does say different things.  

That's exactly what I would expect from a K-monger.  You've been pussy whipped and shit on by the bookers and orgs for so long that you don't even expect  the photos in the ads to be the actual K-girl.  You take what they give you without so much as a wimper.

And to say that the act of posting info about fake pic and its source is har_mful to mongers...and not seeing how his actions are literally anti-monger... what kind of a bizzarro ass world warped around twilight zone are we in?  

You seem incapable of reading what I wrote.  

If he had been calling out a case where that was actually topical and new information I would not have said anything about it. As I said, the potential harm comes from anyone reading his post and thinking it's new information that perhaps refutes the reviews. Seeing that then then just move on to the next options. But no one in the reviews claimed that the pics were her pics so no one was going to make a decision based on the ad pic. Moreover, this was known more than a year ago.

"the potential harm comes from anyone reading his post and thinking it's new information that perhaps refutes the reviews. Seeing that then then just move on to the next options. But no one in the reviews claimed that the pics were her pics so no one was going to make a decision based on the ad pic. Moreover, this was known more than a year ago."

Hey Papasan, one of my pet peeves is the use of fake and overly PS'd ad pics. Especially when the girl behind the door is good looking, use the real pic! Some providers use blurred pics and it's really them and you get a pretty good idea of what they look like.  Just wondered if you had a way to or an idea to make the orgs stop? Seems kind of impossible, what's your take on the situation?

...whether or not he said it.  HE SAID IT!!!

Jensen, you claim that anyone reading the reviews would see that it's not the person in the pics.

It's not just because I exposed the fake pic, but because it's in his back yard!

chill rocket! you spend too much time digging old posts, picking up fight.
my guess, you're probably not too much into Kgirls, since you and a few are always nitpicking and arguing.  
I rather spending more time in the bedroom with these lovely kgirls then typing here  

I fail to follow your logic, 5Q

LOL

"The internet is forever" is an old saying.  Providers have the right to retreat into private life without having their photos follow them forever.  As long as you can get an idea about her body and the pics aren't ​PS'ed then it's fair.

I didn't take exception to your posting something because you're "talking shit" in my neighborhood. If the profile was wrong or one didn't even exist then I would not have an issue. But you choose to tell one side of the known story. Why was that? How did you think your post was actually helping anyone?

I was wrong about Lixa/Edelweiss having outdated pics? Jensen himself said that her pics were from two years ago. So, no, I was not wrong there unless Jensen lied.  

"In fact, without the first review noting she is not the person in the pics you cannot even show that it's not her based only on the fact an image search matches to the model -- there have been a number of models that have actually been working girls too.   "

If you've never went with what Nigerian prince said you should do to get his money?

I'll give up trying (again) to have a reasonable discussion with you. But to answer the question we have a lot of reports (reviews) of the game being a ripoff for the Nigerian prince.  

looks like when you're just an observer?   I didn't know because I'm usually involved.  LOL

You want to have a reasonable discussion with me after telling me in my face that noting a fake pic is har_mful to mongers? That's rich and a joke.  
I've yet to see anyone in any forum ever say that. You're the first one to ever say that. Most people either just say thanks or at least acknowledge thhe info gathering.  

While I was focusing on Tessa, people might have to do some more research bor Seven apparently. Although 5q is an extremely prolific monger who has undoubtedly very close PO connections, so its hard to think he missed this one. Interesting.  

Seven was on my TDL last week before other priority popup, might still visit her during my break w/ priority, then update!

Thanks for the reply, I appreciate it!

Sorry I missed your answer initially.  

Just read a report elsewhere that she is not the in pics. TER says "photos accurate"...

read that too. one of the hobbyist gave her a 6 from the other site (Overall, looks: 6/10, personality: 10/10, service: 10/10.)
i'm debating myself go or no go? plus still tied up w/ priority.
re. rebranding: looks like it, however, according to grapevine, after last bust, previous po has been on the run, totally out of the area, probably not the exact same po starting this new one. maybe linked but not the same po. And, per, current petite kd, this is new extension from bos  
just something i heard

profile from 2014, then the photos probably WERE accurate with that girl, but as I explained, I don't think this current girl is the same as the 2014 girl OR the 2017 girl named Seven. Profiles are not updated with each review.  They are set up by the first reviewer, and are nearly impossible to get changed after the fact.  

I'm not telling people to not go see her, btw. Or to go see her,lol.