Know the topic of our wonderful KGirls debts in Korea have come up.  

I wonder how their debt "travels" if they come to the US. Are they safe as long as they don't return home? Do the agencies here collude with the loan sharks there?

This one most definitely has a ring of truth to it.  

much the same way, but they are not focused on working girls.  Anyone who speaks Korean can become a customer.  Terms are simple.  You borrow money in $10,000 increments, and then pay it back at $1000 a WEEK for 13 weeks.  Of course, the interest rate is usurious, but these lenders are not part of the legitimate financial community.  Lol    

Girls from S Korea can come for 90 days on the visa wavier program.  Technically the are supposed to return home after that.  Failure to do so could leave them ineligible for future visits.  Though given the current political climate, I'm not sure anyone in the federal government cares about borders anymore.

I'm wondering the same thing and I don't think LP answered your Q, so I'll repeat it in other words. Can a K-girl escape her debt in SK by leaving the country? ... leaving SK to go to the US (or Australia, etc.) and try to stay there, legally or illegally?  
.
Do the SK loan sharks have contacts in the US to help them recover the debt or put the K-girl in fear? Do the SK loan sharks go after the expat K-girl's family still in SK to recover the debt?

For those who follow me, I had a monger mentor; he passed away seven years ago...

once you cross the line and acquire a taste for Kgirl drama, you become more susceptible to mixing her business with yours.  Sounds like you've had some close calls, but have not had the big sting pulled on you yet.  Lol

Personally, I don't really care why they are doing this and how much, if any, debt they accumulated. They are doing a service job and I'm focusing on the service aspect.  

Here is an example of how review manipulation is justified by K-girls and non K-Girls alike.  

every Friday night after she finished work.  You missed out on a lot of OTC time - all you had to do was pay off her debt to the loan shy.

not say I supported this kind off behavior on the part of providers, we are agreeing that its a bad practice for hookers to do this.  I posted about it to inform members that it exists.  In fact, I do NOT go along with this, but that doesn't mean the providers don't do it.  Its bad form to condemn the messenger because you don't like the message.  

I agree it applies to all working girls.

Or at least he has ever since TDS has rotted what little is left of his brain.

you have ever posted here.   Congrats.    

and then read it one more time if necessary, or even two or three more times if you have to. lol

into my post that is not there.  Since you are posting this on two different boards, I already responded on the GD board, and here's a link to that response, which covers what you are saying here.  

CDL, I was with you in that I didn't see you condoning the actions (I also didn't you see frown upon them but thats another story) and I still did not see them when GaG told me to reread your post.  

that I'm betting cannot specifically quantify the difference between a 4 and a 5, or a 5 and a 6, or a 6 and a 7, service-wise, I will just say  to you if my scoring system using only three catogories, Average, Below Average and Above Average is too difficult for you to manage, then don't rely on my reviews when seeing Kgirls.  I have PM'd a lot of reviewers over the years over their scoring inconsistencies by asking, did you really think Girl B who you just saw was better than girl A, a near legend, that you saw four months ago?  Most will walk it back and say they didn't mean to suggest that, but its too late to change scores on the review post-approval.  My system is designed to provide Accuracy, Consistency and Honesty in my reviews as far as service goes.  Looks are subjective anyway, so dong the same for appearance works, too.  

Though I suspect someone has made it before.

Did you ever do Ruby? I found her at King's in SF and followed her to Rainbow, Double Dragon, Empire and then to Westside and a sister spa on San Pablo near University. Put gallons of cum in that one.

You replied to my post, but you did not really reply to my question.

People who make this argument usually don't post directly on the forums as to not be obvious shills/white knights/simps.

MY question.  Let's try it again . . . .  Knowing that a 7 from me is below average and a DNS recommendation, would you consider that to be a girl you would see any more than you would a girl with  a 4 from another reviewer?  Its a yes or no question.  Lets see if you can answer it.  

I think it's impossible to quantify the differences in scoring as it's subjective. I haven't really had to use the full scale, but I will say that I treat a "7" as average and worthy of seeing as long as you keep your expectations muted. I treat a "5" as a DNS. I just don't see the benefit to mongers to limit the range of your scale. Even if you use your 7-10 scale and explain the reasoning behind your scoring in your review, you're still doing a disservice to those who aren't familiar with your personal scale as well as the girl's scoring average.  

I already have done this, replying to you specifically a year ago to one of our initial pms. Check out my pm on 5/20/20 for detailed explanation on what differentiates a 5 from a 7

Rocket is still flailing around trying to NOT answer my questions.  You are right, its impossible to quantify the differences in scoring because they are subjective.  One man's 5 is another man's 8.   So  in YOUR case, you have embraced a set standard like I have except you set 7 as your average.  Fair enough.  This makes your reviews consistent and valuable to other mongers.  From this, we know that 6 and less is below average and 8 and 9 are varying degrees of above average.  It would be better if all mongers used the same reference point for "average", but as long as we know WHERE your mid-point is for average, then we can make sense of your reviews.  I can now make sense of your reviews and you can make sense of mine.  Most reviewers do not have a set number for average, so one average girl might be a 5 and one might be a 7, and this is especially true when there is a longer period of time between the two reviews.  My 8 for average 8 years ago is in the exact same place as it is now.  There is no chance that I have given a girl a score that is not consistent for performance with all the other girls I gave that same score to.  Apparently, you are the same.  

answer my questions, so I will move on and simply thank you for the excellent example you gave to prove my point.  On YOUR scale, by definition, YOU don't know when you are giving a 5 if a girl is below average or average.  Likewise, you don't know when you give a 6 if the girl is average or above-average, yet you cover the entire range of below average, average and above average with only two  numbers.  If you are giving the scores, and YOU can't make the distinction, how do you expect other mongers to make sense of your scores when your system is not accurate?  For most of us, the difference between average and above average is often the determinative factor in  whether to see or not see a particular girl.  You have blurred that distinction by making them both a 6.  Further, how is a reader supposed to know  where good and great begin and end and how they compare to above-average.  All of this vague terminology just adds to the confusion for guys trying to make sense of your reviews.  I want to know going in if I'm going to be seeing a girl who is average or above-average, and a 6 does not tell me which I'm getting by your definition.  If you gave a girl a 5 because she is average, she might be a girl I would want to still see, but how do I know from the 5 you gave her that she's NOT below average, since you lump the two together in one number.   This is my point, and even though you don't want to admit it, you have just proved it.  Thank you for your input.  

Wtf? It is YOU who doesn't wanna answer my question.

In my opinion assigning a numerical score to looks is subjective, confusing and not really helpful to me. Just tell me if her pictures are accurate. If they are I’ll decide whether I want to see her based on her pictures, and then I’ll consider her level of service. And if the pictures are fake or otherwise inaccurate then I’ll always pass.

You called a four "beating up on a girl".
Is this according to your scale or ter scale?

The pictures of kgirls are almost always vastly inaccurate. With maybe 5% of exceptions where the pics a real, the pics are usually very heavily psd. To the point where the only resemblance is half a face that was pasted into a model body.

when using reviews as a tool in decision-making one needs to always vet the reviewer. By that I mean check out all those reviews and preferably find some provider(s) you both have seen.

CDL: "If I give a girl a 7 and don't recommend her, would it make any difference if I said she was a 4?"

Like many of the older guys, I started with indies, and if you want to PM any of the indies that post on the GD board and ask if they consider a 4 for service getting beaten up, 99% will say YES!!!    Check the TER top 100 providers list and tell me how many Kgirls you see there.  

Yup

explanation for why you use only ONE number each for both below average and average, and average and above average.  You're night right, if the girl gets a 2 or 4 or 5, that's not what she scored, that's what you gave her, and because of your inconsistent list above, we have no idea what it means.  

Spot on Jensen. That's why when it comes to SoCal and Vegas KGirls there are two gents who's reviews I always look for. We've seen 9 KGirls in common, and their reviews match my experiences. So I know with great confidence that if those guys approve in their reviews then I'll enjoy as well. Hasn't failed me to date.

-- Modified on 4/29/2021 1:28:05 PM

road and hit a dog, are you going to back up over it again to make sure you inflicted the maximum amount of damage?  If not, then you shouldn't be giving a provider a 4.  Its how they make their living.  You can get your point across with another number like I do and express your displeasure in the narrative.  There is no need to run her out of town and make her change her name.   I'm proof that I can give a negative review and NOT recommend the girl without backing over her again to make sure she's dead.  

Maybe it's just me, but I feel like most mongers would not consider a 6 or a 7 to be above average and certainly not worthy of a repeat, erasing a lot of the confusion between differing grading scales. I still don't understand limiting yourself to a 7-9 as you'd be able to explain any grading inconsistency or ambiguity caused by a larger scale through the details of your review.

I'm impressed you finally admitted it. Thanks - that's ALL I was asking for. Admittance that you don't want to give a low score - even though she might have deserved it - because their reviews impact their business.  

Yes and that's why shills and white knights and org reps almost always come out of woodwork when a NEW girl gets bad/mediocre reviews.  

first response was not persuasive, so you post again, but then you  go into you tired, warn-out shill rant and just come off looking like a loon.  

Ooh! Do tell, which amp? I'd love to see her even tho she must be getting up there in age...

binary view of the world.  The question is not whether I want to avoid a low score, its do I want to give a score that both expresses my dissatisfaction in no uncertain terms while allowing her the opportunity to find a customer base that does not include me, and the answer to that is YES!  These two ideas are ONLY mutually exclusive in YOUR black and white binary world.  For you, its all or nothing, and maybe that's why you have whined so much about the high percentage of disappointing sessions you have compared to most other guys here.  You refuse to even consider that part of the problem might be you.  The 7 I give will not send guys to see a girl if they have been reading this board where the subject of my review scoring comes up about twice a year.  

I don't know how it relates to the topic on hand, but I didn't claim to attempt to take the orgs down.

Oh I'm now an asshole customer? I never whined about my bad experiences,stop lying. I whined about others' bad experiences..when asked, I simply provided info. I can take care of myself. I want to help other mongers who were getting shit experiences.  

TL/DR long ass reviews.  Hobbyists see you gave her a '7' and think that means she's a "Hot Time" when buried deep in the review you were really saying she's "Below Average."  Your scoring makes your reviews deceptive, misleading and just plain bullshit.

"us-them" rhetoric you use.

As many times as I’ve seen him do it, it never occurred to me to call him on the “No True Scotsman”. You’re dead right. I think this describes his general approach better than anything I’ve read so far.  

Where exactly was "us-them" rhetoric in my post you've replied to? The fuck them part? That's just my emotions.  

...or easy to please, but I have never met a kgirl that deserved a 4 in either looks or service.  Probably a few 6 at worst, mostly years ago when I was starting out.  If you are an established client and you are getting 4s, you need to up your org game.

My priorities are not on one side or the other.

What is the difference between a ymmv review and a regular review tho?  

What does established client has to do with girl quality?

I've called for providers to be banned -- the only person in the thread explicitly call for that -- who ultimately were. I don't claim I influenced that action by TER; merely that I was the ONLY person who put that in words "then she should be banned".  

Calling for a provider to be banned is not quite the same as calling a subset of them as idiots. But OK.

LOL

I don't think you are a shill...please don't put words in my mouth. Do your practices hurt other regular Joe mongers? Yes,they do. Do I think you shill? No I don't. I have a fair share of respect for you as well, something I don't have for shills.  

NOT to rely on my reviews the next time you are choosing a Kgirl to see.  Bwahahahahahaha

May when you were talking about "punishing" orgs . . . . .

"I'm not sure if this is what you're talking about, but From your, klientdmvs and others stories about dmv market, it was the same thing that further reaffirms my point. Bad reviews were not written to keep other girls coming. Instead of putting them out of business, these girls were able to gather some biz at expense of other, less fortunate customers, who don't visit backchannels. Seems all of you were OK with this sacrifice to ensure quality down the road. "

Jensen, I'm only reading your side of this debate because I, like a few others, blocked the little rocket-felcher a couple of months ago when he destroyed a thread like he appears to be doing in this one. But just by reading your side of the debate I can tell he's gone off of his meds again, and he's out of control. And it won't stop until others stop responding to his divisive and accusatory diatribes against guys like you, cdl and me.  I've said it before, and I'll say it again: if we all just ignored him and he had no one to argue with our threads would be more meaningful and would stay on point.

but while I do find myself arguing with Rocket all too often he is not without some merits -- just very myopic and oddly (given what seem to be his politics in general as far as I can tell) not too inclusive or accepting of diversity. I suppose we all have our hot buttons.

I never accused you or your alias of anything, sir. If you take exception with me, that's fine. I never had many issues with you though. You actually have the balls to make non-positive reviews and don't have issues to call out providers publicly.

I've never claimed to bring down any orgs, nor is it my goal. Sorry. Im sure I could bring them down  at least temporarily - I do have a DA as a good acquaintance  and gathering info is my forte. But there's no purpose for me to do this unless they strike at me personally. It would hurt the mongers too.  

". There were not any more "less fortunate customers" than existed elsewhere"

I see your sentiment be repeated ad naseum on here, and my question to those who dislike him, is: Why do you continue to respond and "instigate" him? You have no one to blame but yourselves. I personally believe in participating in productive discussions, so I have no need to mute even the most heinous of you. Lol.

the threads would be a lot shorter.  LOL

100% Agree. Just think about how many threads he's hijacked to make is arguments about reviews. This is a perfect example: it was a thread about KGirl debts IN KOREA. And rocket-felcher converted it to one of his droning, divisive diatribes about numerical review scores. WTF?

He can't really call it out because the quality has been up to par this year. If you do your research, you'll have a good time most of the time. I think I've had less than 5 average experiences this past year. Of course, some agencies have been better than others and I don't know which agencies he frequents.

Maybe I misread it, but I think he said the quality was down a good amount this year.

If what we have here now is what you consider "up to par" something must have really gone down hill between mid 2017 and early 2020 when I was not playing. For most of the past year agencies have struggled to keep two girls listed. When they have typically they have been older and often not that fit.  

I literally went YEARS in between K-Girl sessions where the girl was not a minimum of a TER 7-8 and who couldn't at least pass for twenty-something or early thirties at the oldest. This last year I have seen multiple "aunties" at some rather reputable K-AAMPs who were quite obviously north of forty.

I did not convert it. GaG brought this matter up initially, not me.

I'm happy to know I did not misread you and will not be accused of misreading.  

Hey Gag,when you have seen some of these ajummas, did you walk? Or still they were good enough to proceed?

For the orgs in LA, it was "going to be a long, hot summer."  That was consistent with your claims that you would be taking them to task about their practices.  Are you walking that back now?  Or you just couldn't find any in LA that were doing the things you complained about, so that's why you are "tentatively OK" with how our SoCal agencies behave?  So the thousands of words you wrote about his last year about shady SoCal orgs was just speculation on your part, that you, in fact, didn't know of ANY orgs, other than the one we already knew of,  that was engaged in dishonest practices?  

I'm pretty sure I was talking about bay area orgs, ie orgs that I actually knew. Not LA orgs I actually didn't know. Go ahead and find a direct quote about "LA orgs". Never did I single out your LA orgs anywhere. I get that you felt threatened about the orgs you attend,but please don't make shit up.  

You were the first response to shift from the issue of debts and getting induced into sex work to the claim some used the debts to justify being gentle and easy in reviews. Gag  just agreed with you and then used CDL as a suggested example of easy reviewing to avoid low scores (which was actually unrelated to debt so you can give him some shared responsibility).

And you keep saying you DON'T objectify women.   BULLSHIT!!!

You did not specifically mention LA, this just said "THIS SITE", meaning TER.  So here is what you said on May 20th . . . .

Oh no I said bad product I must objectify womenz!

Fair enough. I merely stated my viewpoint though. GaG agreed with me and called out CDL and the rest is history.  

you are doubling down on your prior lie that Jensen called you out on.  The "topic at hand" was Kgirl debt.  Go up to the OP and have a look.  Reviews had nothing to do with the topic until YOU brought them up.  Its a time to own it, not make excuses.  Saying that you stated about reviews DID related to the "topic at hand", i.e., Kgirl debt, is just pure bullshit.  Just because GaG agreed with you doesn't necessarily make you less wrong.  Lol

Um, yes and I commented how many use kgirl debt or insinuation of such to appeal to peoples emotion and to make them appear in a better lightin reviews and in other public evaluations.

I didn't have to do much. I was prepared for a shit show here, but it didn't slip in through as much.

So let's recap, Jensen.

I think it’s obvious by now that no one is going to solve this guy’s problems.  

You and cdl are great at attributing things I've never said to me. Nowhere did I say anyone should worship me or any other garbage like that. I'm not important and I never asked anyone to follow me.  

It shows that I view these girls a human beings, you don't.  Another clue why you have such a high rate of bad sessions.  You just keep making this easier.

binary thinking to Jensen.  You suggest one must be biased or unbiased.  There is a whole range in between these two extremes.  Life in general must be difficult to navigate for you.  A guy who likes tall Kgirls could be biased towards that type, but that doesn't stop him from writing an honest review about a shorter girl.  A bias doesn't not necessarily get in the way of honesty unless you intend it.  Its a false narrative to suggest guys with certain biases are incapable of writing an honest review.  

A bunch of nonsense, sorry.

Wtf? I view these girls as human beings as well. They are almost all nice girls and great human beings.  

is a toaster that doesn't work.  The toaster is an object, not a service provider.  You still think you don't objectify these girls that "can take a pounding?"  

Cdl, I suggest your invest your time in learning about service as a product

learn to not refer to Kgirls as "product."  Its demeaning whether you say she was "good product" or "bad product"  Would you like someone where you work to refer to you as, "He's just bad product?"  You don't find that dehumanizing?

I do not see anything dehumanizing in that either. If I do a shitty job and I sell a service, um yeah.  

on your justification of objectifying Kgirls?  Why am I not surprised?  

I don't objectify anyone.

Oh fuck, here I go...

for me to retire from this thread.  100 posts is way too many considering 80% of them are after the OP was highjacked.   I was one post away from clicking the "ignore" button on someone.   LOL

I've heard various stories over the years about K-Girls and their financial position.  There are probably as many reasons for the girls coming here as there are girls who have come.  I've been told about debt needing to be paid, sometimes debt that was paid by the org here that the girl is now needing to work off.  That would be one of the saddest scenarios, although there are many, including a girl who said she was saving money to bring relatives from China to South Korea.  A girl who was paying off her father's hospital bills, a girl who was saving money so she could buy a house in Korea for she and her mom, and the list goes on.  

Too bad TER isn't like Survivor and we could vote the Village Idiot, a/k/a the little rocket-felcher, off of the island. He ruins every thread he touches. It's sad that one loser can disrupt our community so badly.

Maui is a very smart man!

If she can't pay it back?? What happens then??..hummm.

Maui is an exceedingly smart man. He listens to his kgirls, buys review subs for them to look at reviews and advertises them every day or so on s_witter

I didn't say anywhere that anything that doesn't fit my "agenda" is "wrong" or that anyone who "supports" my "agenda" is "right".

True, so very true.

-- Modified on 5/6/2021 6:15:22 PM

Rocket has joined BigPapsmear on my ignore list.  I just have to remember to log on before I go to the boards.   Ignore only works when you logged in.  Otherwise, all posts are visible.    I went over 10 years will no one on ignore.  I guess I have some catching up to do.  LOL

I bet you well over half of LTM&L's posts on GD are about me, and he is just one of my many stalkers,  but I know you have a pretty loyal stalker in "Kum-Jean" You do seem to own 100% of his attention. lol

with his mom and dad, and is jealous beyond belief that old farts like us can date the hot young Kgirls OTC that he covets, but can't get the time of day from.  Meanwhile, there are other young Korean guys that come here with a more respectful attitude, pay attention, and learn from the experiences of the three dozen or so 10-year-plus Kgirl veterans that post on this board.  From the PM's I get, many of these guys have learned how to navigate Kgirl dating OTC.  I'm a little jealous of them.  I would love to know what we know, but I'd rather be the same age as them.  LOL

Does he ruin it or is it the guys that respond to him and don't know when to stop? How hard is it to limit yourself to one retort and move on? Maybe it's because people realize that this sub-forum would be dead if people stayed on topic.

Kyung Jean's Korean? Please don't tell me you're solely basing that assumption off of his name. And that retort about living with his parents is some boomer shit. Lol.

Your sanity will thank you for this decision.

still living with their parents.  Excuse me if I find that kind of wimpy.  I left home at 18 and never went back.   I  think most "boomers" did something similar.  

Good point. Knowing only way for me to stop exposing hypocrisy and encourage public info sharing is over my dead body... people could at least not egg me on.  

but he's not arguing in a vacuum, yes virtually all the threads that run off the right hand side of the page have Rocket right in the middle of them, but almost all of them also have Jensen, CDL et al right there with just as many posts in the thread as Rocket.

But don't sell yourself short here GaG. YOU baited both rocket and CDL and rocket was initially not going down that path with CDL.

since kj and i have quite a few mutual friends including a few popular kgirls, i know him a bit more, i'd say his hobby history is longer than my 12 years, he had met more girls including kgirls  than most of us here, kj is only one of the alias.... why can't we just play nice here and accept/allow different opinions.....

For me, it’s less about the SJW aversion to an ever shifting definition of objectification and more about how I believe that how you think about anyone or anything has a strong impact on how you treat that person or thing.  

I do have you on ignore (and never took you off).  I saw your posts while checking the forums when I wasn't logged in.  My bad, definitely my own damn fault.

If you have attention deficit disorder, I hear Adderall helps.

Limiting his average post length would be awesome. Though I’m sure it will never happen.

CDL made a ridiculous statement and I just let him dig his own hole, which he managed to do quite nicely without any more help from me except perhaps a little "nudging" of him in the right direction. You give me too much credit, CDL himself did all the heavy lifting as I knew he would.

Here's the link from farther up the thread where YOU brought a link over from another thread about something I said with the specific intent to get Rocket started on  one of his rants.  You even said that you "warned" me ahead of time that you were going to do this.  Its disingenuous to sit here now and say, "Who?  Me?"

then I brought it to everyone's attention since it really was a topic better suited for THIS board, I pointed Rocket in your direction and then you did the rest of the work for me.  Rocket is hardly the only one who thinks your 7-10 scale is just so much bullshit to use as an excuse not to give the girls poor scores. The rest of us are supposed to read between the lines because you don't have the guts to call an OTHFB an OTHFB. You have admitted to this literally dozens of times so it's not like I am putting words in your mouth.

Yes, I think GaG needs to get off his high horse as if he is clean in this.

So you'd like censorship of dissenting opinion as well? Lol. Youd like to silence me so bad huh. Even ignoring me isn't enough anymore huh.  

that he INTENDED to get Rocket going,.  Gotta give him props for that even though he is doubling down that it was the right thing to do given his  lack  of reading comprehension on the other board.    But he still hasn't explained why he called me out for something that HE read into my post on the other forum that simply wasn't there.  Several other posters over there also told him that just because I didn't condemn the practice then I MUST be condoning it.   Despite the negative reaction to his claim from other mongers and even a provider,  he decided that HIS interpretation of my post was the same as what I intended.  So he "warned" me he was going to bring a link over here to get Rocket worked up, and in that regard, he was a huge success.  Kudos to Karnak  the Magnificent on his mind-reading abilities.  LOL

Ten months ago, I criticized CDL's scoring system on the General board:
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/ter-general-board-12/you-have-your-own-scoring-system--there-are-over-3-million-hobbyists-on-ter-969701?page=

the numbers don't really matter.  If you give a girl a 5 on a scale of 1-10, then that's a lower score., but if the scale is 1-5, then she's at the top of heap by getting a 5.  The SoCal guys that regularly follow my reviews KNOW that a 7 is a DNS on MY scale.  Likewise,  I am careful to explain my scoring system on this board a couple  times a year,  so that newer members understand it.  Finally, for those that are too dumb to understand what my numbers mean even after having it explained ad nauseum, my narrative will usually carry a corresponding warning, so if I give a girl a 7, and say she is below average, or that she's as DNS as far as I'm concerned, and they still don't get it, these same guys are not going to be able to consistently use a 1-10 scale either.  My system is EASIER to use.  If easier doesn't work for somebody, then don't use my reviews when  deciding who to see next.  Its really that simple.  I don't know why you are so obsessed with it.  

...for an old Chicken Beak!

This is the *second* time you have (hahaha) "threatened" to ignore me.

Every time he comes here he feels compelled to make a personal attack.  If he knows so fucking much about Kgirls, why did he make a fool of himself a few days ago when he didn't know the difference between a Kgirl and an Asian indie?  He also has never posted anything here about Kgirls from his own experience except that he eats food with them at an incall.  He has three reviews here,  for girls in 3 different cities.  They are generic in nature, and don't really say anything that is not already in other reviews.  Finally, he has not ever talked about specific girls that he has seen like most other posters here.  That doesn't seem like a guy who has seen MORE Kgirls that "most" here.  There are many here that have seen over 100 Kgirls.  Some of us sometimes see that many in one year   His board posts don't contain any useful information for anyone else, unless you care what kind of water some org is giving handing out at the incall. He comes here with his attacks, gets bitch-slapped and runs away for a few days like a little girl.  So far, he's behaving like a young stalker, not a grown up monger.  So why not direct your advice to him to JOIN the community and discuss the topics instead of hurling personal attacks?  

without posting an attack on me, so think again WHO is living in WHO's head rent free. The person BEING stalked is the one living rent-free in the stalker's head.  

I feel like you can't really make those assumptions about someone's experience because you don't know what they're withholding. I don't think there even is such a thing as "experience" on this board as most of what's said can't be proven and is anecdotal in nature.

Honestly, you are a big, cool man with lots to live for.

You have made yourself irrelevant here, so I will put you on ignore.  You're not worth my time or anyone else's here.  Your only contribution in months is to tell us what kind of water some org is giving away.  Yes, you're quite the Kgirl raconteur.  Stalk all  you want and just keep proving I live rent-free in your head.  Who ends up looking pathetic?  I have three Kgirls to see this week, and you  need to make sure mom and dad don't catch you posting on a fuck board.  Bwahahahahaha

This is now the 3rd (!!!) and maybe 4th time you have threatened to ignore me.