Can you guys just kill this thread as some here just don't know how to STFU.
Hi fellas, I'm a kgirl lover from NYC, yes we have a few..
Visitin SD next month...
I'm looking for hot dolls who might also offer greek/bbbj experts...could you favor me with some advice, names, links. Reviews?
Pay it forward fellow mongers.🙏🏽
Thanks a ton ahead of time.
Ern
use touring girls that stay only two to three weeks. Whoever is there now won't be there in a month, or maybe even gone in a few days if they have already been here a few weeks. Your best bet is to wait until you get here and then do a search for who is here THEN. If you are looking for indies rather than agency Kgirls, then put your ISO on the SD Regional board. There are some good Asian indies who make San Diego their home base.
So be careful if you somehow get in with them (doubtful but you never know).
for one of the Kgirl "sins" are embarrassed, so they like to SAY it was because they wrote a bad review, when really, it was something else, so I would be skeptical of this kind of claim unless it happened to you personally, which I doubt that is the case, since you have no reviews in San Diego. Fear-mongering or rumor-mongering? Reader's choice.
Took cdl less than 20 mins to read and reply to someone he claims he has on ignore. Impressive. I'm guessing his fervor to defend buddy Tim here did the trick.
It's up to whoever to believe. I can provide a link to another site with a convo (pm me) and I can provide an image of a pm exchange on another site I've had...pretty sure he's OK with me sharing this info, with his screenname omitted.
But to paraphrase, he gave a bad review to a girl and the same day he got a text saying if he ever did it again he'd be bl'd. Plus he had a lot to say about a private Asian Picture Club forum on, ahem, HaXor, where anything negative said about sdag would be removed.
Liars, bullies etc should be publicly known as such.
-- Modified on 11/7/2021 11:21:58 PM
SDAG girls is Alex, not Tim. Always has been since 2008 when I started. There is also a former Kgirl who takes over booking on Alex's day off. Nice try.
Come on, dude.
Alex=Tim.
-- Modified on 11/8/2021 9:56:21 AM
that you, personally, spoke with either Tim or Alex so that you have this first-hand knowledge? You also claim that someone has actually been blacklisted. Where did that claim come from? We know it wasn't you, because as you correctly say to others, you probably couldn't get approved. Your example alleges only a "threat."
As far as reviews getting removed from other review sites, there are some that are much more diligent about investigating and removing fake reviews than here, because they are not dealing with the volume that TER is. Some also get removed other places for inadequate or inappropriate content. Here, a review can be three lines and still get approved.
Never? I don't really speak to bookers.
I said that they (sdag) threatened a guy who wrote a bad review, with bl if he were to do it again (bad review). I think this is a tidbit people looking into the agency need to know. That is all. Do you think a threat to bl someone over a bad review is a good practice? I don't.
If people don't believe me, they don't have to. I share what I know with them and they will make a decision themselves.
I'm trying to document, publicly, all grievances against agencies so everyone is aware of them. And people who are afraid of speaking out can safely contact me and relay info to me so I will keep their name out of it.
So, are you still going to argue Alex and Tim are different dudes?
You're not sharing anything you know, you sharing what you want to believe based on what others have said. In other words, your "is known to" is you speaking for others when you don't actually have the basis for doing so -- from who have has heard those types of accusations from in the past? Guess you're all about do as I say not as I do.
Second, you revive a thread that was done with information that was not asked for and then start a long argument largely about shit you clearly don't know but seem to want us all to believe your do. If you've not talked with Tim or Alex you have NO WAY of knowing if they are or are not the same person. I don't know if CLD has or has not (it's implied that he has) but at least his point there is hitting the nail on the head.
It is clear however that your perspective is compromised, in other words you are not sharing anything that you know to be true. Same rules apply to you. Double talking doesn't get you out of it. Its time to be nice an apologize to him.
First, the guy said he was visiting next month, so I did comment closer to his trip. I warned him of something that he should be aware of. I did not start long thread of argument. Cdl started it. I merely stated what I know. I'm not speaking for others at all - Im sharing info I have.
I am extremely sure Tim and Alex is the same guy. I did a good amount of research, I know the sites, I know the creds, I know the names, etc.
These two orgs are ran by him. I'm sure he wants to keep his two fake identities separated, but hey - he loses the right to do so when he is bullying his clients by telling them not to write honest reviews. But I'm also mildly amused by putting posters in a place where they have to either lie publicly or acknowledge that I'm right. Note that cdl walked into this himself. Sprinted, I might add.
Cdl and you coming in here trying to attack my credibility was predictable. If you don't like my sources, then don't like them. You don't have to believe my info. But if you're attacking my credibility regarding Tim, let's ask CDL if he has had any interaction with Tim outside of the strictly buy/sell.
He himself has conflict of interest there I believe.
You know me. The more you try to shut me up, the more loud I will be. I suggest you let me say what I mean to say and stop attacking my credibility. I share info that mongers might find useful, that may impact them. Or not. Everyone is free to decide for themselves. This is merely food for thought, dishes should be done by individual mongers.
You and cdl (well, maybe not you but cdl for sure) always said it's part of the game. They make the rules and we have to shut up and eat what we're given. Why are you now mad I'm giving specific examples? I have proof of other mongers talking about the org. Why are other mongers a bad source? Other mongers have the same credibility as you or me - all mongers are made equal.
You chastised me for painting with a broad brush. I'm giving a specific example here...and yet you again chastise me.
I don't have to be a victim of bad practice to warn others of bad practice. That's not how things work. You don't have to be a victim of bullying to call out bullying.
Attacking your credibility? Hardly.
What I said was you don't know. You are taking the words of other and you could have stated that at the start. However the main point was the OP was NEVER asking for that information. What he DID ask about was who he might be able to see that offers the things he was asking about. Did your comment speak to that at all? No, it is 100% a side track.
So what I AM attacking is your ongoing mission of turning every fucking thread on the board in to some rant about evil orgs or you desire (need?) to seem to be the expert even when you don't even participate in the market or have anything more that what anonymous others have said somewhere. So like like I said, give it a rest -- which does mean not having to always have the last word or respond to what someone else has said. I don't expect that so yes, you are the guy starting most of the arguments.
-- Modified on 11/8/2021 8:20:59 PM
I warned the guy to be aware of this agency because multiple mongers have complained about it in SD. It was like a three sentence post that warned to be careful in case he is tangled up with them.
That's all. Because no one protects mongers, I want to make sure to warn others in any region about questionable practices. That is my mission, yes.
If cdl did not reply to this, there'd be no argument whatsoever. If it's unhelpful info, no need to reply.
Instead, the info I provided was attempted to be discredited. Then I offered to send links privately and defended my info.
I stated my info and I've had multiple people who claim to ignore me, racing to discredit my statement. Who really started the argument here?
People who couldn't take the truth talked about their bud's org and people who don't like me and what I stand for. If only ya'll got as mad for this org openly bullying their customers into not write bad reviews - which goes against the whole point of ter btw.
Typical Felcher Boy. Hearsay, based on a rumor, based on another rumor, based on innuendo. His "sources" are too afraid to be named or speak for themselves, which specifically calls their credibility and integrity into question, but to Felcher Boy their accounts have the gravitas of Jesus' Sermon on the Mount. In a sad way, it's kinda funny. But the one thing he said that I do believe: guys reading his rants should be able to believe him or not. Well, at least here on TER, he has neither integrity nor credibility so I doubt anyone desiring to learn about KGirls will believe a word he says.
the first thing you said on this topic about SDAG . . . .
"Sdasiangirls is known to threaten/bl those who write reviews not to their liking"
You didn't say threaten TO blacklist, you used a slash, which means threaten OR blacklist. I'm just asking how many guys you know who have been blacklisted by SDAG over a review? So you're walking back your claim that there have been actual blacklists over an unfavorable review? Was it just hyperbole to fit your agenda vis a vis orgs in general?
This is why I rarely engage with you. You make a bullshit claim, and when you get called on it, then you try to say that you said something else. Its right there in black and white. I take it this backpedal means you do NOT know anyone who was BL'd by SDAG for writing a review, but you DO know someone who was allegedly threatened because somebody you only know from a screen name on some other site told you, but you have never been threatened or BL'd yourself at SDAG, and you have never even talked directly to Tim or Alex, or Tim=Alex (if that makes it easier for you to understand)? Does that more accurately sum up the truth of what you are saying? If not, then tell me what I got wrong.
-- Modified on 11/8/2021 9:56:40 AM
I've been told that the OC org + SD org that are both ran by the same person,
Tells people if they write a bad review they will be bld
Threatens people over a bad review asking them to remove it
Blacklists people if these demands are not met
Many of these claims are out in the open.
I have never been a part of sdag, Asianworld or asianhealthclub or islands of Asia or any other names they've had. I never spoke to Tim or Alex.
I think Ive answered all your questions.
Now, may you answer mine?
Do you know that Alex and Tim are the same person?
Regardless of you answer, have you ever dealt with either of them outside of buying pussy? Ie, maybe you helped him out to do something? Maybe played golf together?
Thanks again.
you said, "I've been told . . . ." You seem to have less personal experience with the things you like to talk about than anyone here, with the possible exception of Knobby Hunter, and he's a troll.
Hey Ernesto-You should check out Amanda Parker for San Diego fun. She reminded me of Savannah St. James whom we've both had the pleasure with in the past 
Ok, CDL take a big gulp. So you want me to teach you how to turn on the Ignore feature on TER? That's simple!
Ok, Schmuck where's your I-Phone? Now clearly speak into your phone, "Hey Siri, Turn TER Ignore on".
What it didn't work? Try it again. Wow it didn't work? Well try this one, "Hey Siri, Why isn't TER ignore working?"
What did Siri say? Turn up your volume and ask the question again.
Siri said, "Hey Schmuck--Ignore is in your brain-correction-whatever is left of your brain. Try not jerking off so much every day".
After I've answered his in-depth. Alas.
Note that he hasn't refuted the Alex=Tim statement. And is still trying to discredit me and my info, while he knows everything I've said in my post is true.
This guy would rather split hairs discussing threat vs act of blacklisting, when the act of threat for reviews is by itself more than sufficient grounds for TER not having those orgs as they violate their terms of service. If people are bullied to not write less than stellar reviews, maybe they should take a break from being on TER.
By the way, how are they still on TER?
There is no ad in sight for these girls. The link leads to their site "calendar", but "approved instructors" is password protected content. Isn't that a ter rule violation? Hmmmhhmmmm.
-- Modified on 11/9/2021 12:55:24 AM
YOUR word that some org is violating their rules and ban the org? After you call exposing your lies "splitting hairs" what kind of cred do you thing that gives you with TER? Then you double down on claiming everything you said was the truth, when you have no firsthand knowledge of any of it. Each day you sound more like Don Quixote.
I'm not trying to discredit you or or info, because its NOT YOUR info. If you have personal knowledge of something, it might carry a little weight with me, but regurgitating what you read somewhere else is not YOUR info. Don't be butt-hurt over this. It is what it is.
I'm not butthurt over anything. Most people don't give a shit where or how they got the info as long as the info is correct. My info as in "info collected by me".
Note that you asked me questions and Ive answered them, truthfully. None of them were lies.
Why aren't you answering my questions? Again, you are deflecting to discredit the messenger of the info, instead of actually answering about the info.
My point about ter was that even threat of bl, never mind the act of bl, over negative reviews, is grounds for banning on TER and is not a good look for any org.
-- Modified on 11/9/2021 9:48:46 AM
You think because the info was COLLECTED by you, that makes it reliable, even though you have no firsthand knowledge of ANY of it. This explains your total disconnect with reality. If you say gullible really slowly, it sounds like oranges.
Hes still trying to discredit info I collected even though it's as good as his info or any other mongers info on here lol. Ive offered links and other proof.
And yet no answering my questions after I've answered his. These were my questions:
Do you know that Alex and Tim are the same person?
Regardless of you answer, have you ever dealt with either of them outside of buying pussy? Ie, maybe you helped him out to do something? Maybe played golf together?
Here's another one: is telling customers that they will be BLd for bad reviews and subsequently bling them, against ter terms of service and grounds for banishment from ter?
-- Modified on 11/9/2021 10:02:47 AM
that actually got banned for a rules violation on TER was in Las Vegas, because they had a statement on their website that offered discounts for good reviews. That is against TER policy, someone reported it and then they were gone. The offending language has since been taken off the website.
If you have similar proof that another website is doing something illegal, then why haven't you reported it? You simply provide a link to document the rules violation. Either you have the goods or you don't. Personally, I think all of this BL bullshit is just you blowing smoke up our asses. YOU have never been threatened or BL'd, but because someone said they were, if you think that is enough to get the org banned, then go ahead and take your shot, but if you don't have a link to the proof, you just come off as a laughing stock.
The number one reason guys are BL'd is because they are rough or abusive with the girls, but do you think these guys will ever admit that was the reason? No, they say they wrote a bad review, or that they overslept and missed the appointment. NO ONE will ever admit they were blacklisted because they were rough with a girl, so I don't know why you are relying on the statements of others who are feeding you BS because you WANT to believe its because of reviews, so that it fits your preconceived narrative that all orgs are the bad guys. So what proof do you have that anyone has EVER been blacklisted by this org you are targeting over a review, or that there is threatening language on the website?
That's not what I asked. I asked if you agree that threatening to bl for reviews is against ter rules.
Are you dense? You really want hard proof, on the website by the org, of a threat to mongers?
LOL. Some of org folks are technologically inept idiots, but they're not THAT stupid to incriminate themselves.
And the other stuff is nonsense. Ive had mongers admit to me they were BLd for being rough or goinh balls deep with a magnum. And guess what? I was on the orgs side there.
Once again, no one protects mongers. Its always the orgs word and girls word vs mongers words. You have capt save a hoes and shills and those who will sell off their family to have good pussy, but no one wants to believe mongers. I believe mongers because most don't have incentive to lie. They don't make money by writing bad reviews. Orgs and girls lie because by having bad reviews impacts their money.
But good start. Can you answer other questions as well? Alex=Tim one and doing things with Tim (or Alex) outside of pussy transactions like enjoying activities together or helping him out with some errands. Come on,I believe you can do it. I would stand up and applaud you if you tell the truth too.
to believe certain things so badly that you throw reason and critical thinking out the window. That makes you gullible for just about any anti-org claim that comes along, even though you don't have any corroborating personal experiences. You are what professional con-men refer to as a "mark."
You say that no org would "incriminate" themselves by putting something that breaks TER rules on their website, when just about EVERYONE here knows that recently, a LV org did exactly that. Are you just dense, or are you ignoring the truth because its inconvenient for your biased narrative? You are just deflecting from the fact that you have seen NOTHING to support your contentions about this org. You have only read unverified claims on discussion boards. It seems you want to accuse an org of violating TER rules, but have nothing to document it, right? Why not suggest to your "sources" that you think have the evidence that they report the org and give TER a link to the offending language like someone did for the the Vegas org? Do you know them well enough to make such a request, or do you only know them well enough to take their claims at face value?
Now you also claim that mongers have "admitted" to you that they were BL'd for being rough with a girl. I have never seen a post like that on ANY board. If it wasn't published on a discussion board, then it makes it even more dubious. Maybe they only told the guys by PM that seemed gullible.
Lol, you are the one who employs zero critical thinking here.
So now because one dumb ass org did this, now every org that has threatened a monger with bl needs to have a written evidence incriminating themselves? Lmao.
You can't be fucking serious. So let me ask you, you claimed before that one so Cal booker you knew said to clients if they wrote a bad review. Why wasn't he reported to ter? Why didn't You report him to ter?
Was it hearsay cdl? Or did you actually hear this booker threaten clients and let him do it without reporting him!? Where was the evidence in this case?
There are SoCal guys right here that have lost their booking privileges with certain orgs by writing "honest" reviews with low scores.
Was this also hearsay, cdl? Did you experience it firsthand or did you hear about it? Well if you had the first hand experience, were these bookers reported to ter? If you know these mongers lost their privileges because of low scores and honest reviews, there must has been concrete evidence, right?
This is your quote, from a year ago. Guess what, cdl? I went and just asked.
And now you're faulting me for that? oh what's that? You said this BEFORE you realized I'm gonna name names publicly? Lol. You were trying to teach me to play by your asskissing rules.
. There was one booker in SoCal that, after you passed the screening, he would tell you that the girls always appreciate positive reviews, but if you score lower than a 7, you might not be invited back. That's about as in-your-face as it gets. Other bookers are more subtle, but if they don't think you're getting the message, they will word it a little more strongly before BL'ing you.
So you experienced all this firsthand too cdl, right? Why was this booker not banned from ter then? What about the other bookers here? Can you name me one?
Or did all these bookers also magically retire in unison?
Cdl is always hesitant to name anyone publicly. The girl he said was not as good anymore? Can talk shit about her, but not name her. We agreed to both name shitty orgs, I named ebk and he
... named no shitty org in LA and simply ignored our agreement. I am asking you right now, who were all these bookers "ghosting" mongers for writing honest reviews? Were they reprimanded by ter or by you? Lol rhetorical question really. How the hell is anyone ever to trust him to actually out a bad actor? He'd be more concerning about getting prospective pussy from he booker and establishing a network, lol
LOL at you still not answering the questions I posed. I'd trust a random mongers statements on Tims org over yours any day, since you were/are buddy with him and helped him out before. And you've never, ever cared out a single booker even though you openly admitted many threaten to bl people.
Am I telling lies here? Well, tell me I'm telling a lie and you dont have any relationships with Tim and you never helped him with anything. Tell me that Tim isnt Alex and he doesn't own and book both of these orgs. Whenever you were convinced I was wrong you alwsy told me. Tell me I'm wrong here.
Cdl, things would've been easier if you just started to tell the truth, you wouldn't need to keep track of lies. You said you're ignoring me. Then you said you're avoiding back and forth with me yet you've just done that and some more managing to not answer my questions in the process.
Look how fast you went and took a grenade for your booker bud. Less than twenty minutes after my post was out. I wish someone would defend random mongers in such a way, mongers who don't have a network and only have money for one two visits per month. But you call people who believe random mongers gullible yet rather would believe shady ruthless people who fuck over people on the regular for money? . Lol. Why would I ever trust a girl or.a booker over a monger?? Makes no sense.
Monger won't steal from me. Monger will rarely lie to me because theres little reason to. Mongers helped me and provided valuable info out of their camaraderie.People really think I'm kidding when I say I take random ass mongers on the internet who are honest over all my atfs combined? Pussy is replaceable. Loyalty honesty and camaraderie isn't.
Edit:and yes, trusted mongers opened up about many things,including being BLd for going tooo hard or too fast or by being too big and going balls deep. What is so shocking about it? Not all mongers position themselves as perfect gentlemen. Why would anyone lie about this? Who goes around telling people lies?
-- Modified on 11/10/2021 1:43:16 AM
a complete and utter surrender. You once again want to ignore things I have posted that contradict your claims and then make up things you want to believe I said. You are famous for misquoting people, so unless you have a link, I'm not going to dignify your garbage claims with a response. The place that I referred to about not scoring lower than a 7 is closed long ago, and I think I said that at the time. It was an example of PAST practices. You are alleging current practices by a different org, so let's see your evidence. Do you realize this post is entirely recycled material you have said before, not once, but many times? Sometimes you just have to take the "L", go home, and wait for the next game. Thanks for being the pinata yesterday. It was a slow day for me at the office. That's how you got off of ignore temporarily. I'm sure you know you are still on ignore because you can't PM me. There is a way for me to respond without taking you off.
I hope this shows to everyone that cdl has conflict of interest here. Tim aka Alex is his bud, of course defends him. You shouldn't be allowed to review any of his girls. Or any girls by any booker with whom you golf with.
Anyway.
Whereas I've answered EVERY. SINGLE. QUESTION. You posed to me. I've answered you clearly on every question you posed. I've laughed at the concept that you need hard evidence of org posting threats on website in order to say they're doing this, when you claimed everyone was doing that.
"so unless you have a link, I'm not going to dignify your garbage claims with a response. "
Link to what? To your own quotes where you say bookers bl people for bad reviews?
Easily.
" Just ask guys who have actually been ghosted by the booker for low review scores"
"There are SoCal guys right here that have lost their booking privileges with certain orgs by writing "honest" reviews with low scores. "
Same post. Did you find that out by hearsay? And if not, where was the hard evidence? Where are these socal guys? Did they also retire? Who were the bookers?
" Other bookers are more subtle, but if they don't think you're getting the message, they will word it a little more strongly before BL'ing you. "
Did these bookers also retire? These other bookers? Who were the bookers? Where's the hard proof, cdl?
Name names cdl. And Tim/Alex, if you're reading this, I'm onto you. Don't be a Pos and stop threatening mongers. A monger is entitled to an honest review.
If your good was not good, deal with it and take it on a chin lke a man instead of a little bitch.
I sincerely hope that for every time you threatened and BLd someone for a bad review you lose a tooth along with 10k. Don't fuck with the mongers right to write reviews and criticize your product.
general statements about SOME things I have said in the past about CERTAIN orgs (many gone when CV and TER shut down) that are not tied to the org YOU are accusing. I didn't say it has NEVER happened. What I said is I haven't seen any evidence it has ever happened at the org you are targeting, which is sdasian. I will stand by my statement that writing a bad review is not even in the top 7 reasons that guys get blacklisted, but it DOES happen occasionally. Here again, what were the circumstances. Was it a revenge review because the guy didn't get BBFS? Did she turn him down for an outside date? I'm aware of many reasons WHY guys have been BL'd for a bad review, but its not that frequently. I have actually had girls tell me that certain bad reviews they got were revenge reviews. Still, NOTHING you are quoting from me supports your claim that sdasian is engaged in "threats and blacklisting" customers, and if they ever have, it may have been justified. You keep asking for proof, but you haven't supplied any. You are here bashing an org that you have no personal experience with. If it was a legal business, you could be sued for slander. So let me be for specific, since you are either slow, or pretending to be . . . . . do you have a link to anything I have said in the past about the org you are targeting having threatened or BL'd anyone for a review? Just to be clear, I agree they have BL'd mongers for cause, but I'm talking about only a review that they didn't like. We are talking only about the org that YOU accused, sdasian. Can you focus long enough to answer without going off the deep end? YOU are the one who made the accusation, and so far, all of you given is excuses why you can't tell us the basis for your accusation, since you have never been there, nor talked to the bookers. Grandstanding with your threat to the booker just makes you look silly.
Now, why did you make up the bullshit about me doing an "errand" for these or any other bookers? I don't do errands for bookers OR Kgirls, and there are posts from the past saying this. I wouldn't even take a girl I was dating to the ATM.
I told her to ask some young guy looking for OTC time. You just keep embellishing and deflecting, don't you.
You have accused me of using hearsay, ie second hand info.
I pointed out situations where you claimed the same things I claim without any evidence and probably the same hearsay.
The difference? I'm not afraid to name names. You haven't shown any ability to name names from your generalizations. You claimed that many other bookers will warn you befor bl for bad review. Why can't you name them? Clearly, they committed a sin against the mongers so they deserve to be aired out. Where are the names?
If you can't even name those bookers you claim were doing this, why should I expect you ever admitting to an org you're a close friends with booker with? Exactly, you'll protect them to the death. Just like you protected that allegedly retired kgirl. And so forth. You protect these businesses and maybe protect yourself. I want to protect the mongers rights. Don't give a shit about anything else. A monger has a right to write an honest review without being bullied.
I already told you I'm willing to share links. You want proof? Unblock me for a few hours and ask for the link I can pm you. Or you can DIY and go to "std board" and read some answers there. I openly posed this question about this specific org in the SD forum. There were a few good responses and then pms to me. Unlike you, I'm not afraid of orgs coming after me if I mention their names in an unfavorable way publicly. If they think its OK to mistreat customers for money, I think its more than fine to blast them and their practice. Fuck em.
Speaking of deflecting, you still haven't answered my question about Alex=Tim and you helping Tim with some things. But you quickly got indignant when I mentioned errands. So, you helped him with some things - something you haven't refuted - but never actually ran errands. Great, thanks for clarifying. I take my words about you running errands for him back.
I guess asking you to focus on the topic you originally brought up about a specific org is just too much to ask. BTW, there are more Bullshitters on the STD board than anyplace else in the P4P game. Its populated with shills that praise the orgs they are shilling for an bash the competition, including Mufftime.
We are running off the edge of the page, so I give up trying to get you to concentrate on the subject YOU BROUGHT UP. Clearly, you have no definitive answers from firsthand experience with this org. You're just a garbage recycler.
I already said in plain English I haven't had first hand experience with this org.
LOL. What are you trying to ask me, when I already answered it.
Now if you could answer me, I've asked you like ten times to answer my questions and you've still not answered it. Is this how you treat conversations and tough questions cdl?
"std board" has same damn mongers as here. Many post on there as well, and in other forums.
Of course there are shills there like mufftime. Shills are everywhere. In fact I'd say your affiliation with Tim is close to making you a shill... but I'll admit that unlike shills, you've never actually advertised a girl outside of reviews. And actually went at other shills like muff. So I do give you some props. You're not fully bought with pussy and self-interest yet. Those who are don't care about shills like mufftime existing.
Also - most shills don't "bash competition".
figured out, but you don't know shit. Now you're suggesting I'm "close to a shill" for Tim? Okay, tell me how many girls at his org I have reviewed in the past two or three years? Since you think Alex=Tim, you can include sdasian as well. Go ahead and count them. I imagine we're going to get crickets. If I'm a shill, I'm the worst fucking shill who ever lived. The only time I ever mention either of these orgs is when guys ask on this board how to break into the Kgirl scene. These two orgs will screen through employment and will accept P411 membership the last time I checked, so for guys with no Kgirl refs, its a way to get into the Kgirl scene. So you have no idea if there is any "affiliation" between me and Tim or Alex. Like usual, its all speculation with you because you have no firsthand information to share here about ANYTHING. You are what we call a lurker, not a monger. You could use employment to get in, too, if you had a job. Go ahead and take the last word, its what you live for.
That's why I said "close to shill" and even gave you props. Can you read?
Lol at me not being a monger. I do see girls for money. I believe this makes me a monger. I also aggregate all information I can find by any means and assign it degree of trust and share with others, those who don't have the reading power, time or access level to access such info. I can probably do a better job at communicating which info is second hand info, I agree there.
You've yet to explicitly answer my questions. But you're not gonna answer them,are you? Lol.
I have a job and it's a good one. You make some really dumb assumptions sometimes. If you think I'll ever give my job or pii info to anyone in this biz, especially someone who threatens people, you are out of your fucking mind. I'm an anonymous monger.
"Now you also claim that mongers have "admitted" to you that they were BL'd for being rough with a girl. I have never seen a post like that on ANY board"
Seee cdl, thats because you don't read enough. I've perused thousands of board posts, thousands of reviews and so forth. If you had the ability to have access to digitally search easily,you would learn a few things about getting info. You would know who kgungjean used to be, and so forth.
Anyway
Here is a sample from a fresh review:
http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/detail/nala-review-by-cuttie2003-2333551
I quote
"Last sexy girl who got similar body blacklisted me for banging her too hard"
to refute what I said? I said I have never seen it posted on a discussion board. Your example is an outlier review. Being rough is the number ONE reason guys are blacklisted, so there are hundreds, if not thousands of guys who have been BL'd for this, but its usually a girl who is BL'ing them, not the org. If two girls from the same org BL as guy for being rough, then the booker will often ban them from seeing any of his girls. I wasn't going to post again so you thought it was the time that you could get away with an outright lie. Nice try. This doesn't help your cred much.
Here's a link below from four years ago where I explained the 7 most common reasons for getting BL'd in the Kgirl scene, compiled from many discussions with both Kgirls AND bookers. It has nearly 10,000 "reads." That might be record on the Kgirl board. Maybe there is something in there that will help you in your quest. Notice that bad reviews did not make the cut.
You're the one who is always talking about putting me on ignore and back yet keep on replying to me.
What did I lie about? I directly quoted you and showed you a review where a monger freely talked about getting BLd because of being rough.. Mongers do admit it publicly, which is what you claimed they don't do.
Again, you claimed that mongers were getting BLd for bad reviews. Since you claim my info is bad because its hearsay, let me see your proof as well as naming of those orgs. Can't do it? As I thought. So are you also claiming hearsay or are you gonna say you're a little bitch who can't name names publicly that acccoedin you wronged mongers?
Stop deflecting. I offered you proof in form of links to public posts and screenshots of pm from another site to show you my proof. You refuse to even see it yet claim I dont have proof. When I askYOU of proof of what you said and name the damn names, you can't.
You claimed multiple times that mongers got bld. I don't give a flying shit what number reason writing a bad review is on the list of reasons.
You claimed mongers were BLd if they were to write bad reviews. This is clearly an anti-monger policy, a piece of shit policy of someone who only cares about money and not truth.
This is clearly anti-review site policy. This is clearly an anti-ter policy.
So what did you do about this fact? Did you report the org? Did you talk about them publicly? I have. Surely you have hard evidence. Or is it hearsay?
One more time,
If what you said was hearsay and you didn't have evidence, why are you shitting on me whe I use hearsay?
If it wasn't hearsay and you had hard evidence how come not only did you not report them, not only did they not get banned, you can't even name the piece of shit fucks. You had the evidence and you just watched fellow mongers get fucked by greedy anti-consumer fucks. If that's the case, you're nearly as bad as these fucks. Because you keep protecting them instead of airing their asses that fully deserve to be tarred and feathered
Cdl: "general statements about SOME things I have said in the past about CERTAIN orgs (many gone when CV and TER shut down) that are not tied to the org YOU are accusing."
Yeah, general things. Because you're a pussy to name names. If you knew they were bling them for bad reviews, why didn't you report these "certain orgs"? You said you need hard evidence. Or do you not need to have hard evidence for "general" statements? Why don't you name some of these certain orgs? What good is your "general" info?
You can't? Is it because your shit is also hearsay? You actuary do t have evidence when every time I used a generalization you demanded evidence? Hypocritical much?
Or is it because you're protecting them and not mongers? Well, Im rectifying this. Don't. Fuck. With. Mongers. Info.
Don't. Fuck. With monger reviews. Reviews are sacred and belong to mongers. Reviews are the only fucking outlet left to the consumer here.
If an org or a girl tells you to not write a bad review or you'll be BLd, or if they tell to take down a bad review or your will be BLd, that org needs to be exiled from every fucking review site and a Scarlett letter put on their name. They don't play fair,fine. Then let everyone knoa they don't play fair and kick them out of the review world.
That's what I'm doing. And I'm gonna do it with every single org and girl in this biz in this country. You lie or threaten bl, you get called out.
Can you imagine a fucking restaurant telling you you'd be blacklisted if you wrote a bad review? Exactly.
Anyway.
I'm simply pointing out your hypocrisy and your protectionism for your cronies. If you watched some orgs bl mongers for bad reviews and didn't say shit, you're just as bad as them. You are culpable for unjust bls. How can you call yourself caring of mongers when you see such behavior?
I'll give you a hint. The reason why you even brought up those general stories is to fearmonger people on the fence to NOT write bad reviews and protect the business. Little did you know your words would be used against you. Ohn and Tim if you're reading this, you should thank cdl and his mouth for my investigations.
Collected by Felcher Boy, from Anonymous Mongers, who tell him he can't disclose their user names or aliases because they don't want their names attached to the claims. Now that's the kind of credible information that I want to rely upon when making decisions. NOT!
I have public statements from mongers too. I will be more than happy to link them to a anyone who wants them. Unfortunately many of them are on boards that are forbidden to be linked on here.
So if you want links, just pm me.
I hope no one is delusional enough to think mongers on this boards are somehow more credible or favorable to those on other boards.
and do intend to make this my last comment in the thread.
You really don't want to hang your hat on the "most people" peg. It's been pretty well established that most people suffer from confirmation bias. So you're correct in the "Most people don't give a shit where or how they got the info" but not with the "as long as the info is correct" part. It seems most people want to see things that support their beliefs and hardly question the validity of that information if it does so. They also tend to flat out reject information that doesn't support their beliefs, or twist the information in ways that allow them to see it as supporting their beliefs.
So if you want to hang your hat there regarding how you approach the information you have and are sharing feel free but it's not doing you any good I suspect.
You're right. I take my words back about most people. I got worked up and used something I don't like others using. Thanks for pointing it out.
I would amend that statement. At least from my experience, mongers with whom I shared info that wasn't first hand, did not seem to care as long as they were able to see that my info was correct and then trust me based off that info. It's up to anyone to trust the info I have. They can always ask me to clarify if its firsthand info or not. I've always said I don't think I've ever been BLd from an org, or explicitly threatened to. So all my evidence is from other mongers. I want to operate as a grievance agent. Like I've said, no one protects mongers so I want to be the one who can post grievances by proxy, whether aggregating or handling people who are afraid for their status and would provide anonymous info.
I've used this example before, even tho it's against the rules on most boards, I'm actually a proponent of posting std rumors. Because to me, the health of mongers is more important than rep of girls or orgs.
A false positive rumor is far less benign than ignorance and then going to a girl and getting the std. Put a rumor out there, estimate its validity and let everyone else make a judgment call. A few times you will run into witch hunts or vengeful mongers. It happens. The % is negligible tho.
The point is, I don't know too many people whod refuse more info (as opposed to less info) besides people who don't like me. I will try to do a better job of communicating when the info I have is not first-hand info from my side
Cheers
Felcher Boy is on the ropes. I just looked at the Vegas KGirl forum of another site and the top post was from Felcher Boy. Except the post had been deleted by the Admin of the Board who noted that our own little Felcher Boy’s posts had violated Board policies, and more importantly that Felcher Boy was already on restriction for previous inappropriate posts. Admin of that site warned Felcher Boy that one more violation of Board policies would result in Felcher Boy automatically being banned from the site. Fingers crossed that he fucks up again and we rid him and his rumors, innuendo and hearsay from that site. Now if only TER Mods would do the same. Please?
Since you know that other review sites are much more diligent about investigating and removing fake reviews than on TER you concentrate all of your fake reviews here. I makes so much sense now. Keep pumping out the fake reviews. Remember that you were floundering during the summer until I lit a candle under your butt and challenged you to pick up the pace. Its not exactly what we were expecting. Some of the most recent one's are boring. It appears you are plagiarizing some old ones and they are actually sub standard. So its time to put some effort. Nobody reads them but its just fun to pull the puppet strings, you know?
Can you guys just kill this thread as some here just don't know how to STFU.
It really is time for Admin to ban the Felcher Boy. His posts are getting more and more abusive and aggressive. In one post this week he talked about hitting someone in the head with a baseball bat. He needs to go. He offers nothing positive to our group, only negatives. So many threads that he jumps in wind up in the right margin. Please Admin, it’s time to take action.