Amber is one of the new visitors.   Very new to the business and eager to please and enjoy.  Tall, pretty young women with a great body, smart too.  Highly recommended.

Location:  Tysons/Falls Church
Donation:  $$$
Pix:  accurate, small tat on back, strategic and tasteful piercings.
Services:  LFK, BBBJDT, BLS, HJ, MSOG, CFSMP.  No CIM or Greek.
Looks:  8
Performance:  8

I was a sweaty mess after an hour, good times.  

-- Modified on 8/4/2010 9:24:16 AM

Forgot to mention DATY as part of the festivities!

This is a case where you should wait.  First one is always agency sponsored.

a cowardly alias who doesn't really contribute to this board.  Your call.

and ignore asshats hiding behind aliases who demonstrate conclusively by their posts that they have no clue how any of this works.

I suspect that many of their bad experiences, constitute a tiny minority of reviews, have more to do with their ineptitude than with the ladies they complain about lol.....

just wait for a second or third review, don't get suckered into it.

Also those who say don't wait go see her in support of this guy, well take a look at their reviews too

-- Modified on 8/4/2010 12:27:02 PM

You guys are too much, thank you for the good laugh.  Hope you made each other feel better about yourselves.

Right! in the mean time i 'll just try some place else.

the kid looking through the window, with your nose pressed against the glass, from the outside wishing that you could have what everybody else has.

Your loss, others gain.  

Why the cowardly alias again?  If you are a contributor, feel free to PM me.

I looked at Ken302's recent reviews as suggested.  As one example, they show looks ratings for Daisy, Stephanie, Vickie, Sophia White 10, 9, 9, 10  respectively...and 10 is "one in a million". Subsequent reviews all deteriorate to 8's and 7's. That's just the facts, so factor that in for future reference.

Based on your "research", with regard to looks:

Daisy:  My rating was 10;  10 reviews for 83 points = 8.3 on average

Stephanie:  My rating was 9;  7 reviews for 59 points = 8.4 on average

Vickie:  My rating was 9;  7 reviews for 60 points = 8.5 on average

Sophia White:  My rating was 10;  17 reviews for 148 points =  8.7 on average

Numbers don't lie but you do, my ratings are/were right on, especially since Looks are very subjective on the high end of the scale.  There was no degradation from beginning to current, I have my ideals just like you have yours.  In fact, deionj70 reviewed Vickie and gave her the lowest score which dropped her average, that's ok - different strokes for different folks.

Like I've been saying, with a sample size like this, the providers are consistent but the clients' taste is the unknown variable.  Don't blame the providers for your ineptness, just look down.  I know this is over your head because facts don't seem to matter to you.

If you look at the Performance ratings, then my scores align very closely with the averages.  

You fail to mention my other reviews, I have over 50.  So you cherry-pick 4 and your reality exists only in your little mind because the numbers I just provided vindicate me.

Got anything else to say that's unfounded?

And I for one, discount your reviews.