Take for example a hottie who has stellar reviews. You book your appointment for later in the week and you count down the hours until that 1 hour of pleasure. The moment comes and she and you just did not click.

The business transaction is finalized and you have an hour with a girl that you just are not attracted to. You and her engage in the standard activities: Fondling, DATY, BBJ, Mish, CG, K9 and you and her get little if any pleasure from them.

I have been with a couple girls that were hot and had good if not great reviews and we just clashed. I know if I write a bad review about a girl because she seemed not to be enjoying my company may hurt her business. I know that not every provider will not want to stick her tongue down my throat or like the taste of my cock. Not every provider will like how I smell or may just not like me off the bat period. So do I hold it against her in a review?

IMHO I say under these circumstances it is best not to write one. I would forgo the 15-days of VIP status because the business losses that she may suffer would outweigh the benefit that the hobbyist community would gain from me telling everyone that Provider X and I just did not click.

Opinions please.

Honesty should always prevail. If you're not on some witch-hunt,when you write your review,you should be capeable of submitting prose indicative of what occured.

If you do feel that YMMV was very prevalent with Provider X then mention that. You could also claim that you two just didn't click. When I read something along those lines,I usually don't give any credence to that particular review.

Take advantage of what TER has to offer without guilt.

IMO

The fact you and her just didnt click and are willing to say so is a good reflection on you.

People are not stupid and question the exclusive 9-10s arrays posted for a select few.

Therefore a 7 or (God forbid) a 6) reflecting what you honestly think and a clear portrayal of what transpired is valuable to everyone here.

Angelina had a very interesting comment on a few of her recent reviews well worth digging up. The gist of it was she ran a special, attracted guys who normally wouldnt approach her because of the deal being offered, and didnt have the hoped for boffo time. She took responsibility and said she shouldnt have ran the special for that very reason.
One more point, if enough fake or/and exaggerated reviews show up for a girl guys will just ignore them as BS which will really hurt her business.

So my view is in the long run you are not doing anyone any favors by making up stories (other than the fact we all know that this is a complete fantasy here). Honesty is the best policy.

And wrote about it on this board. Was also advised to write an honest review. I've found that sessions vary greatly by individual and that some reviews are seemingly an exercise in poetic license by the hobbyist. I've also let the agency know when I've been treated differently by a provider than her reviews would indicate.  Happened recently with Kimberly Denae. No bbbj, no DFK, etc.

I don't understand why a provider with gobs of "stellar" reviews would get bent out of shape by one (or even a few) mediocre or  affirmatively bad reviews.  And I don't see how a few bad reviews sprinkled in amongst gobs of stellar reviews will hurt any provider's business.  You are overestimating the effect of a bad review.  A savvy hobbyist is going to look at the totality of the picture painted by all of the reviews.  If a handful of reviewers were not impressed with a particular provider but the other 90% were blown away by her, a hobbyist is not going to be deterred unless there is something in the descriptions offered by the negative 10% that strikes home.  For example, I saw a review of one highly-regarded local in which the reviewer said she did not appear to be sensitive to the needs of an older man.  A hobbyist that falls into that category would find that to be useful information.  If the gal is off-the-charts-as long as you can get it up quickly and stay up for an hour, but not so great if you need some time to get things going, that's a good thing to know.  Hobbyists in the latter category might want to look elsewhere, or take more than one blue pill well in advance of the session.
The path that you describe is more harmful to the process because it can create a false picture of a provider's appeal.  If the only people who write reviews are those who have something good to say, what's the use?  Half (or more) of a provider's clientele could have been unimpressed by her but yet according to her reviews she will appear to be amazing because the only hobbyists that posted reviews were those that had a good time.  
Your proposed approach does not make sense to me.  And isn't the situation you described what the term "YMMV" was invented for?

I am going to start writing reviews again. I stopped doing them because they got to be a pain in the ass and it sucked when the 20 minutes or so it took to write it is later removed for unknown reason.

For example I wrote a review on a provider from Baltimore known for putting fake pics up. She however got decent reviews. I was the first one to give her a "bad" review and it disappeared after a week or so.

Eventually, others gave her similar reviews and those reviews were not taken off.

I am going to start doing reviews again because:

* it is entertaining to go back and read them
* 2 weeks of VIP ain't bad
* 20 minutes to help out a fellow hobbyiest ain't much in the long run to help people make better informed decisions

One of my best sessions was with a CL girl named Sally

http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=75300

She is long gone, but I would not of seen her were it not for the 3 reviews. 3 hours of non-stop no holds barred action; it was an outcall session that went way over the initial hour. Hot blonde willing to go as many times as you wanted without abandon. The hopes of finding another girl similar to Sally is why I still hobby.

My opinion--- it's not always about the PROVIDERS.

And with that you just brought back a flood of memories.

I thought she was on Backpage... maybe she was there too? Ah no matter though...

Sadly she dropped off face of the earth before I got a chance to see her a second time.

I would LOVE to find another Sally!

That's for the flashback Sonic.

And I hope you're doing well where ever you are Sally.

If you do write one than just write it from your perspective without sugar coating anything. Ymmv is part of the hobby. I think we all realize that.

Would you forego the review out of fear that it would help her business too much, causing dozens of your fellow hobbyists to be disappointed by a girl who wasn't right for them?

Didn't think so.  Write the review if you want to, but do not feel that you have to.

Yes, sadly I was so close in making a second appointment, but all of the sudden phone always went straight to voicemail revealing her real name actually.

Greek, BBBJTC, TOTAL GFE. And totally down to earth to. Good conversationalist too.

I think I had 7 shots on goal in over 2 hours time.

most of us are going to have an appointment that is an unmitigated disaster. I once had a date with a well-reviewed provider who for me was a total drama queen. I got no wood the whole time. Any review I might have written would have sounded like a Jerry Springer Show and would have looked odd along with her string of 8s and 9s.

a very similar experience. Highly rated touring lady w/great looking pics. She was every bit as gorgeous as her pics & we did everything expected, very good BBBJ, several positions, & a satisfying finale. But we just never clicked, couldn't tell why. So I wrote it up that way & gave her a 9 for looks & 7 for performance, which was well below her 9+ average. Was that a 'bad' review?  Would anybody decline to see her based on a lone 7 among a bunch of 9/10's?  I doubt it.
Best to just tell it like it is & let the reader make their own decision.

Lets say you rate her 8 or 9 for looks...

You should be able to at least give a somewhat objective review of what she did while you were together... clicking aside.

If it was truly a personal thing, then give her the number that you think applies, but say why you gave that rating. Why didn't you click? Did she smell badly, or was she all over you and you wanted it slow and romantic?

If it is really just a personality issue, you should still be able to give a reasonable rating, your personal preferences aside.

I had a gal would would DFK and I thought I was going to fall in... not my kind of kissing. I didn't let that affect my rating, but I did mention that she just dfk, she really DFKs.

Make sense?

I really believe a clear report on how you and so-and-so just did not click won't hurt her business much at all. In fact, it may keep her from appearing TGTBT and her future customer's expectations from being too high. At the same time, it will really benefit your fellow hobbyist.

Some providers really seem to be much more YMMV than others, and to me, that's fine. I just want to know the possibilities. There will be times when I feel adventurous (and, for example, take the plunge with that tall girl at the bottom of the list of my favorite agency, who appears to be the definition of YMMV!). Other times, I just want something more predictable and go see a lady who's reviews agree. The latter is of course not  a guarantee from disappointment - but perhaps precisely because some folks have chosen not to report a less-than-good experience?!.

The reviews are to help other hobbyists. Not the providers. That may seem unjust to you but that's the way it is. If you are writing reviews to help providers, I'd rather you just stopped entirely. We don't need any more white knight reviewers. We've got too many as it is. The way you can help other hobbyists is by honestly reporting your experience and letting them make a judgment.

... if they happen among an array of 9s and 10s. They are often surprisingly informative.

... of reviews will serve to make your good reviews sound much more credible. So, reading your other, praiseful, reviews, guys won't think you are just an easy grader.

Write it the way you saw it.  Honesty is the most important thing.  I hate it when a review says the gal looks .....  or does..... and after you put down the donation you find out that it ain't the case

It's sad but true that we need to be reminded of this fact from time-to-time.  Thanks!

The reviews are to help both reviewer and provider. Honesty is a given but the point of the thread is about when a guy gives a girl a 2 for performance (when her averages are 8s and9s) simply because he did not click with her. Is that bieng honest? That is why it is best not to submit a review under such circumstances.

Reviews are for the fellow hobbyists, period. Those who write reviews to help the providers and feel it 'prudent' not to write a review when it would be less than stellar are really pathetic. White Knights like that should have a special star by their name so the rest of us would know to just totally disregard their reviews, LOL.

I think some guys here are writing better than experienced scores and reviews, cause they are either scared they won't get another date with certain agencies. So they are playing up to the owners. Some are White Knights protecting there favorites. I wish they would just be Honest.