I have noticed quite a few ladies charge more per minute for 90 minutes and don‘t even offer discount for two hours.

For example, I see a lot of 60m for 300, 90m for 500, 120m for 600.

Or 60m for 400, 90m for 700, 120m for 800.

What in particular doesn‘t make sense is the 90m prices, as the  additional 30m should be half the 1hr rate not more.

I don‘t know how to explain this other than the ladies not understanding math or that they do not want to spend 90m with you and slow things down a bit and instead are in a rush to get more money.

This is an old question. Basically the idea is that If you are going for 90 you are getting two pops so you need to pay for that even if you are not taking the full two hours.  Another way to look at it is that if people are willing to pay 5$ for 90 then providers are smart to charge that.  

That extra 30 your booking for 3, could be preventing her from booking another 1 hour @ 4.
I've heard a lot of ladies only discount the time they want per appointment. So, if they prefer one hour appointments, they will price to deter guys from booking additional time.

There's very little rhyme or reason to the pricing structure used by many providers except for how they feel at any particular point in time and what they believe (hope?) the market will bear. Some providers have a good head for business while other do not. Some will offer specials or make other adjustments if business is slow, but for others the price is carved in stone. One good point that's been made is that providers tend to favor certain types/lengths of sessions and use their prices to steer clients accordingly. If a provider offers a special and you jump on it (pun intended) then that price could become a reference point for future sessions. It's certainly frustrating to anyone expecting "normal business practices" but it is what it is and all you can do is to seek out those situations that work for you. Beyond that it all depends on local market conditions.

I agree that when I would book a 90 min appt, it would be the expectation, that I would have enough time to recover (at my old age), so that I could get a second pop in. However, it now seems that 1 pop is all I am good for and I need almost an hour to get there.  Esp with a new girl, there is the "get to know you time up front". Next is the wash up, so I know you are clean and I can check in with scheduler, as well as count the money in the envelope. So like at least 15 mins is gone by now. Then the warm up cuddle kiss that leads hopefully to a BBBJ . By now its at least at the 30 min mark before we are hard enough for sex. I can remember back in my 20s when I could get sex start to finish in 7 mins. LOL. So that might explain why to 90 min is more money for some ladies.  

In terms of revenues, I think it would benefit ladies to offer some discount for 90 or 120 mins, but most do not.  I get that # of pops per session could be a contributing factor in the other direction, but I’d be a little surprised if that is really the concern for most ladies.  I think it’s simply conventional reasoning at play mixed with ladies doing what their peers are doing.  

Ironically the lower end of the market which deals in 15 minute intervals, seems to to favor this classic “volume discount” aspect of market economics.

which is why you tend to see them offered for the less expensive providers.

As far as the difference between $500 for 90 minutes vs $600 for two hours, it’s an incentive to lay out that extra $100 for the additional 30 minutes.  Another poster noted that it’s a “frustrating” pricing structure. I just see it as “curious” and figure that it works for providers who don’t see the need to offer a volume discount for their services. Based on the prevalence of this fee model, it seems the market bears it.

my rates are exactly that way. Because it is my preference.

Lots of good information above. Here's a few more thoughts...

The key to everything is to remember that everyone has their own preferences--and not just about length of appointment. For example, some providers like to get to know their clients a little bit before actually meeting because it allows them to become a little more comfortable and plan accordingly. Others find back and forth emails and texts to be a distraction and (once properly screened) like the randomness and surprise about who they will be seeing. Some like to have some social time in public before heading behind closed doors (often for similar reasons) and others don't like to be seen with clients in public at all. Some prefer longer appointments and some like to be concise and to the point.  

Who prefers what? Often you can figure it out in a provider's pricing structure. For example, we offer a discounted social rate because we do enjoy getting to know clients over a drink. We also clearly state our preferred length of appointment for new clients on our website. Honestly, while we would prefer to have longer appointments, we also recognize that not all clients prefer that so offer shorter ones. Occasionally, if a client is respectful and inquires we may even provide special time or other arrangements if there is a legitimate reason. But again, not all providers do that because they aren't comfortable changing their structure.

When in doubt, there is nothing wrong with asking a provider what they prefer if you are interested in trying to align their preferences and your own. In fact, it can be a good idea because if the provider is comfortable and content with the structure of the appointment you will probably be the recipient of that contentment...

Please just remember not to try to get a discount. That can be offensive to just about everyone and, if you should still wind up meeting, it is going to dampen the mood for the provider and that can result in a less than enthusiastic encounter.

If you have any specific questions where we can help you navigate these types of things, there are resources on this website with proper client etiquette and tips. You are also welcome to contact us. We are happy to help and give some advice and direction (to both clients and providers).

xo
Tori and Nick

Just be glad this one is mathematically correct. I've seen 90 minutes being more expensive than per hour. For discussion purposes, lets say her rate is $300 for 60 minutes. Her rate for 90 minutes is $475. Weird stuff like that happens fairly frequently.

You are paying for a young, good looking woman to please you. If she is bad at math, that is her problem. Yes, it makes no sense that a provider would list those rates. Logically, it would only be the other way around...as in: 15/100 30/150 60/200, etc. The price of entry should be the stickiest starting point with the highest price per minute...and after that, longer sessions have lower rates per minute, while still being more expensive.

I've found that the more hours you get, the /hr turns into a steal. A few pornstars that I've met turned $1K/hr @ 1 hr to $600/hr @ 3 hrs. Yes, I'm paying more than the initial $1K, but considering that I'm spending more time with them and the rate essentially turns into a steal, I'll go for it.  

 
As others have said, it's sort of pointless to figure out why a provider has their pricing structure set up a particular way. Some ladies have a discount starting at 2 hours, others have it just double their 1 hour. In the end, if you don't like it, there are plenty more fish in the sea that will have a pricing structure that will be more agreeable to you.