http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/searchbyreviewerResults.asp?MemberName=grensho

9s and 10s are given out far too liberally. If we set these women to be the standard for 9 or 10, then in all honestly, you rarely see that a $$$ girl or even a $$$$ that's a legitimate 9 or 10.

Seems he is loaded and reviews model type high end girls (beefeater on a champaign budget). All the other guys also give them 9s -10s; but the rates are 600- >1000.  Guess guys paying those rates don't review much. There were a lot of 9s though, but at BFM this week there was an unusual concentration of 8.5-9.5: The Jaycee twin thing/ the piper girl:/ hillson girl. So you can too; let's not hate him...

The guy obviously sees high end babes. And his review scores are consistent with what others have given the lady. Well....except one whom he gave a 5. And the links to the ads certainly indicate he is booking with genuine lookers.

Don't see your prob.  I mean if he was giving 9s to ladies others were scoring as 6 & 7s then , yeah, he is way off base.  But that is not the case.He is selective. So what?

The dude is living the life and sharing his experiences.

the point of my post was not to say that 1k providers are better looking than ones that charge 300-400.
the point of my post was to show what a 9 or a 10 looks like - as opposed to the 9s and 10s thrown around all the time in minis and reviews on girls that are clearly not 9s and 10s.
This reviewer is in the land of 9s and 10s - NYC.  These girls are tall and slender and very very good looking.  This is to be expected in NYC.  

-- Modified on 3/1/2013 5:47:17 AM

I had a buddy who use to say he scored with a "10" and then would say 5 "2s".

BTW a little champagne in mouth my preference Pol Roger Winston Churchill while doing DATY can be very interesting for the lady.

Not that I do, but I don't see any, or most of these lady coming to DC, except
CSJ may be. You can save up 3 hobbying for 1k providers, but I don't see them coming this area too often.

May be if I'm that filty rich, I'd have my butler fuel up my chopper for a quickie at NYC...

.

He's seen some lovely ladies for sure but I stand by all of the scores I’ve given the ladies I’ve seen. They were all beautiful to me.
I think the whole “looks” rating is totally subjective and overrated. Some guys think a BBW beats thin, others prefer tiny, tall, thick, and thin, the list goes on and on. I don’t need to know how others think they look unless the lady doesn’t have pictures posted. Even then your 10 could be my 2 or vice versa.  
IMHO trying to set the bar on rating the way a person looks is like trying to catch a cloud in your hands. There are just to many opinions. Be safe,

Isnt this kind of like when you pay a lot for something, the ratings get skewed by how much you pay? And because others who paid a lot are afraid to admit they paid more than they should have for an average experience and go against the ratings that have been established? Take cars for example. Sometimes the branding influences ratings and the price no?

On that note, I dont take my "Brand" or ratings for granted, but I also like to experience a level quality and performance out of my clientele that shows they can handle the brand they are stepping up to. Back to the car analogy, how many times a week, especially in the DC area, do you see someone sitting in traffic driving a Lotus or Porsche and wonder, do they really know how to appreciate and drive that car or are they just sitting in it saying "look at me!" I think Tucker Max calls this a "Penis Car" LOL

Just Calling it Like I see it.

Not to belabor the obvious, but I too rarely find myself in the particular high range. However, one of the times I did indulge I got a lady who was definitely NOT value for money. So the price does not to me indicate anything about the satisfaction levels. And in comment to another poster who mentioned that it might be unreasonable to expect those levels of service at lower price levels, my usual ATF is in the $$$ range and is highly reviewed as a 9! She has recently gone more more UTR here, but my point is that these ladies do exist.

If someone thinks your 10 is a 2 based solely off looks, then she's not a 10. We're all different but not different enough for that kind of discrepancy. From a biological perspective, there are some women out there who are universally considered perfect--those are 10s.

But damn! is this Brad Pitt?

Very nicely stated.

I agree with PYTs

I can't help with PYTs. I don't want to see anyone over 30 unless you look hot like Anne Hathway

BINGO
My point exactly.  10 vs. 2.  
If she looks like a SI or VS model then she is a 10.  If not, she is not a 10.  All these 8, 9, 10 ratings here in DC area are ridiculous.  Eye of the beholder.  Phffft. (I think I am guilty of this overrating a little myself with Erika and Daniela in my past reviews - in the real world standing next to SI or VS model, they were probably solid 8's).
My point in listing a link to this NYC guys reviews was to show the LADIES he has reviewed that are actually in the 8/9/10 range.

I'm most likely in the minority here but the ladies on this fellow hobbyist list are all so much the same to me. Many are beautiful yes, but not my type. Tall, white American and European, and a pretty face does not always equal 10. I'd guess this guy is a tall man of the same racial mix. I on the hand really like beautiful exotic looking ladies (ex. you can't tell what the racial mix is) who are petite and have big bottoms or enormous tops. Not seeing any of that on this guys list. Again this proves the point BEAUTY IS IN THE EYE OF THE BEHOLDER. I think it is OBSURD to compare one person ideal of beauty to another's. Comparisons are for choosing between material objects like cars, NOT for people.
If you don't like a rating that is given about a lady, then that is your problem. To the guy who rated a 10 his experience may very well have been 'once in a lifetime'. STOP JUDGING!