My guess is both. The real girl was probably not available for the last three reviewers, so the agency sent a sub who looked nowhere close to the pics. I have seen that many times.

-- Modified on 7/16/2021 3:37:33 PM

Don't guess if you did not have a session with the same girl. The reviewer, who actually had a session, did not appreciate the overweigh and lousy attitude and performance. He did not mention B&S so why muddy his review.  

You don't have to look any further than the clinically insane kook who runs that outfit to know which way the wind blows.

One of the reviewers confirmed it was the same girl in the pic, except she was much heavier and older. The reviewers who wrote the first two reviews never replied to my messages. Case closed. I was interested when I saw the photos and read the first two reviews. I am glad I waited. 15 years of hobbying taught me to be patient and never trust the first great review completely.

I saw Victoria and the pics are accurate but I'd rate the session as 7/7. She definitely was not homely.

She's been around for a while in different locations and time periods. Her older pics were enough for me to determine she wasn't my type. Recommend doing reverse image search with all girls, but especially with this agency as I have caught them using pics from IG models that were halfway across the country when they were alleged to be "working" in DC...

I'm sick and tired of being deceived with outdated pics. I'm glad there are many out there who have no problem calling these providers/agencies out. I know most agencies won't hire models who don't have professional photos but to preserve the reputation of the agency, you would think they would vet the models better (i.e have them send in a selfie holding up a current dated newspaper). In the age where everyone has a camera on their phone, there's no excuse for luring in clients with outdated pics.

https://www.models-world.com/louisiana/gabby-rossi/

I think she has a nice ass. If she really looks like her pics, I am fine with it as I like curvy (not fat though) women. One reviewer told me she has gained some weight but her service was very good.

-- Modified on 7/19/2021 5:47:25 PM

JM is not legit?  

JM is legit but the girls are mixed bags.

Emily Jane Parker is using the pics of a provider in Orlando, Alice Rose. I talked to Alice directly and she says she is nowhere near the DC area at the moment, smdh.

I don't think you can say JM is legit if their girls use stolen pics. A legit agency will at least ask the girls to email a selfie to prove they use real pics. This really makes me reminisce about the good old days when we had TGNT, Prime DC, Elite Girlfriends, Classy DC Escorts, DMYIndys, Pure Girlfriends, and some other legit agencies. Some of their girls' pics might be a little dated, but overall they are accurate representations of what the girls look like.

Thank you for pointing this out. I actually had a client inform me of this and when I confronted Emily about using stolen pictures, she came clean and I have since told her she can no longer work for me.  

Giving credit where credit is due -- thanks Jen for the frank, honest, and transparent response on the issue.

Perhaps going fwd you can ask them to send selfies by holding up a sign.. Say today's date, or some other code word that you come up with on the fly. Something they wouldn't be able to manipulate easily.  

I always do but the date is a good idea. Thanks hun.