Alexis Summer is very petite and I would call her a spinner, or at least very close to it. She's not based in the area but she does visit Tyson's about every other month.

If you like older women, Delightful Danni is definitely a spinner. She's got a nice body, small tits but nice, although her face is on the old side. I've always had a very good time with her.

Tessa with BEG is the quintessential spinner and can take a pounding.

What's BEG?

Brown Eyed Girls

But also keep in mind that is just a model's pic and not the actual woman -- but read the reviews.  Just noting that you should not go there thinking that is who will open the door, not that you won't be happy see who will open the door (but no first hand experience so trusting all the other comments).

Yes. Always read reviews before pulling the trigger.

Why do you keep posting this pic when you know it's not her and rather a famous model?

-- Modified on 10/25/2021 3:48:11 PM

Pretty sure he does it because he knows you'll come along a week later and push it back up to the top of the page for some free advertising.

 
If you make it east I'm sure someone will be happy to say Thank You.

If I wanted a facetious answer, I would have asked you instead of him.

It's funny, I have never seen anyone post a pic of let's say Jen Aniston. Or Angela Jolie as a provider pic.  

But why is it OK to post a pic of an Asian model who has nothing to do with the provider when you know she has nothing to do with the provider?  

 
Is it because "all Asians look the same" or something?  
Is it because in one case people will obviously realize that the pic is not the person?
And in the other they will have some hope that it is because they're not familiar with the Asian model and cannot reverse image search?  

 
There's a special place in hell for people who deliberately try to mislead others.

First, aesthetics. Dropping in a pic related to the topic I think adds to the thread.
Second, functionality. When you add both a picture and an HTML link, tapping on the pic activates the link, so adding big picture to the the post makes it easier to access.

It only makes sense then, to use a picture that you’ll find on the webpage when you follow the link.

You seem to take issue with the picture because it’s not actually Tessa. Anyone who bothers to check her reviews knows that. And anyone reading a discussion forum

So if someone was to post a picture of a famous person who is not a provider with a link to provider/agency, you would be OK with that?  

 
Duly noted. I'm guessing all providers can post pics of famous models instead of themselves because hey, "anyone" knows that it's not them! And what about some lone lurking soul that does NOT know it's not her? Ah just fuck them then huh?  

 
Hell yeah, I take a gargantuan issue with proliferating  lies.

"'Sound and fury, signifying nothing’ is a quotation from Shakespeare’s play, Macbeth.

‘It’s all sound and fury, signifying nothing’ is something you may say to or about a person who is making a big fuss, maybe shouting and/or using bad language, and becoming really angry concerning a particular issue, when it’s not anything they can do something about, and all the noise and fuss amount to nothing and are just a waste of time and energy."

 
I would also include "or not something they are doing anything about" as well.

 
You are very selective about getting on your moral soapbox. You seem to have no objection to guys going BB, getting a disease ant then, very likely, spreading to both providers and other mongers you call your "bro's". Or how about all the people here cheating on their SO, particularly those with families? A lot more potential pain and harm there*.  

 
But since you seem to want to stay on that soapbox let me ask two questions.
1) Are you passing the same judgement on TER as you are on cks?
2) Other than huffing and puffing on this board, have you taking ANY action to have the model's image removed from the agency's site?

 
* (Note, I'm not making judgements here. Everyone is an adult and needs to manage their own relationship. Plus, I don't think everyone who is playing here that also has a SO is necessarily doing so in a hidden way; that's not cheating.)

What you see as a gargantuan issue is seen by most with experience in the industry as common practice.  Informed mongers know this, and rely on reviews to help them determine whether the pics in ads are actual, photoshopped or merely bears a resemblance.  You worry about the “lone lurking soul”, yet weren’t we all lone lurking souls at some point? Everyone else on the board seems to have handled such a traumatic event and moved on. Why can’t you?

In this case, the person who I'm talking to can definitely do something about it, ie when recommending a provider, how about NOT posting a pic of the model she has nothing to do with, setting false expectations ? In this case, you were here to quickly note that she is not the person in the pic - and please accept my thanks for that (and unlike you I'm not being facetious here, I'll take all I can get).  

 
I've said multiple times I used to be very antibbfs. I used to get on dudes cases for going BB and not being tested often when they did. However, I am only human so I too eventually succumbed to some BB fun with some girls. At that point, I could not continue with being antibbfs for obvious reasons. And yes, you could call me a Pos for going BB and I wouldn't get mad at you.  

Besides, agencies openly advertise BB so clearly no matter what is said people will get it as an item.  

 
I cannot stop a monger from going bare if the girl is ok with it and monger wants it bare. I could at least try to stop a monger if he attempts to post fake pics when recommending someone. But if they going BB and not getting tested and keep passing it on, of course its scumbag behavior.  

 
Cheating is between those people involved. Who am I to judge people whose personal situation I have no part of? Personally I never fuck on the side when I'm in a relationship. But everyone has a different arrangement.  

 
Now to your questions. I will note that it is difficult to have a convo with you because you are selectively choosing what posts to answer, under the guise of you ignoring me. Anyway.  

1.

TER as an entity or collection of people working for it has little power to grasp validity of all pics. About the most I expect is the "pics of another person" in the profile.  

What I expect from local mongers tho is to at least not advertise blatantly false pics when they know they're false. Is that too much to ask? In this case, mongers misleading mongers rubs me the wrong way.  

 Do you know how many people fall victims of blatantly fake ad pics on other sites even though they're obviously fake pics and maybe even scams? Hence why I reject the notion of "its obvious so anyone knows about it". No it isn't. Why enable something that may lead to false expectations? In this case it isn't even about the agency side. I consider cks a legit monger, so I'm asking HIM why he is proliferating the fake pics.  

2. I huff and puff on many boards. It's quite simple, my goal is to push awareness. If I make a few enemies while doing so, so be it. I have no other power to remove that image from agency site than to post that it isn't her in places that people read/visit. So no, I have not done anything else besides posting on the boards,which is about the degree of power most mongers have. Insiders/shills like Klient notwithstanding.  

 

But again, this post wasn't about the agency misleading people, it's about fellow mongers proliferating this misleading things. It is one thing for a supplier to lie to a buyer, it is another for a buyer to sell that lie to another buyer. I would quote Mark Twain again, but I'm afraid I've done it too many times.  

This ended up longer than I thought. Forgive me for the length.

Yes. And I want to PREVENT such souls from disappointment from ever happening.  

Is that so hard to understand? What you charge to the game, I want to be not a part of the game at all. Instead of minimizing the lies, you instead spread them.  

 
And you, well knowing it's a fake ass pic of a model who has no relation to this girl, you still post it. Shame on you. Is not posting pics of another person who has nothing to do with provider, that much to ask?

 
Yes, its a huge issue because looks is still the #1 thing mongers look for.

STOP. SPREADING. LIES.

LIES?!?!

Your premise is a lie. Mongers don’t consider the pics the be all, end all. Much, much more weight is given to the experience of reviewers, and their comments in regard to the pictures. The impact of inaccurate photos is minimized (not “huge”) because of the input of our fellow reviewers on said pictures.

Congrats! You’ve taken another thread and derailed it into your soap box topic, “photos”.  You can deny it all you want, but I’m done participating here.

Yes, lies. Knowingly putting up a picture of a model with a recommendation of a girl who she has NOTHING to do with, is a LIE. Just like if it was Angelina Jolie in the pic.  

 
My premise isn't a lie. It's a conjecture. I did not say the pics are the be all, end all. Pay attention. I said girls looks are the #1 thing on the spectrum of things that people look in a girl. And I say it as almost predominantly service guy.  

 
When you knowingly put up a completely fake pic of the girl without saying it's a fake, you're doing a disservice to fellow mongers. Stop it. You're deceiving  fellow mongers.

 
My soapbox isn't pictures. My soapbox is mongers being deceived or mistreated. It's doubly worse when  it's mongers who deceive fellow mongers. Some crabs in the barrel shit.  

 
In fact, I'd say this hobby holds some of highest number of crabs in the barrel out of any hobby I've been a part of. Haven't seen so many fellow hobby enthusiasts be so looking down at fellow hobbyists, in any other hobby. Most other hobbies embrace the camaraderie,  fight together for their rights and dont deceive other hobbyists.  

 
As I've said, there's a special place in hell for people who deliberately try to mislead others  And the faster their arrival to this special place, the better.

-- Modified on 11/1/2021 12:13:48 PM