Recently had a double with two of my favorite ladies. Had great time in separate visits but the doubles was a disappointment. I really HATE rehearsed dialog...sounded like a bad porno movie. Sex was good, just the rehearsed dirty talk was a distraction for me. Will see them apart again but not together...

Or are they already experienced partners with each other?

they've done this together before, rehearsed like I was a newbie

Not self-indulgent or confessional Beefeater or meant to slam providers. Just wanted to know if anyone else had this happen to them during doubles, that all.

God damn it...I thought this was my Psychiatrist's church!

I disregard everything I read from Aliases, and from posters with no reviews. To many people abuse the alias format. We can only guess why...

you should have a doubles with ME!

Kaylie and I are HOT together and NO porn talk.   just lots of fun

xoxoxoxoxoo

Ya, totally. Aliases are for losers. Am I right, guys?

Guess what you pudgy, still-living-at-home, cheeto-eating, presumptuous little dicks, you are all using aliases. Is your birth name Beef A. Eater? Are you Lynch J. Man? No? Well, then you are using what we call an alias.

It would appear that you are really not self-aware at all. You are not cool. You think you are, but you're not. Take a step back and realize that despite your belief that you are the cool guys on the forum campus, it's is still an...wait for it...INTERNET FORUM!!

You are the same type that truly believe you are making these girls come, that you set yourself apart from the other dudes. You didn't and you don't. You're not cool. The girls do not think you are cool, suave or any other similar adjective.

If someone wants to deviate from what is already an alias into what is yet another alias, keep your mouths shut.

And guess what guys...I'm using an alias!!!

Until you post the name that is on your birth certificate, drop this alias nonsense.

Unless I'm missing something, the OP is not using an alias. Even if he were, WTF should people get so bothered by it? Is it really that earth-shatteringly important?

can't use an alias without vip.

If we can reprise this thread in two weeks ...

I agree with mooregreg49 that we are all aliases; TER handles are aliases.

I believe aliases provide many benefits besides the obvious ones. For one thing, it levels the playing field. At one time when I was one of the top posters, I had to submit a post to voice strong disagreement with a member who seldom participated and had very few reviews. I used an alias. He shot back at me emphatically, with unjustifiably  crude language. I was glad he did that. I wonder if he would have done that had I not use an alias.

We should judge the validity of a post by its content. It shouldn't matter if it's done by a new member, an old-timer, an alias, or not-an-alias.

As for other benefits. When I think of more, I'll post them in other threads with other aliases.

OK, so let's see. According to you I am:

Pudgy, living at home, cheeto eating, presumptuous, little dicked, uncool, delusional about providers orgasm-ing, etc...

I guess I hit a nerve, right sweetie? No other reason for you to be so defensive. Well good, you are who I am addressing.

So, read my reviews. I'm not hiding. I don't believe I've ever written that I've made a provider orgasm, or that I've split a bag of cheetos with a provider, or that I've invited providers over while Mom went to the store - but that's the point, isn't it? There is at least a small basis on which to judge me. I have that record. You don't. You don't add anything to this site, other than snide comments - and I guess what you think is a sense of humor.

Grow some balls you pussy. At least post under your registered alias so the folks here can look at your record. Until you do - I'm done with you.

Your example of a benefit is worthless. So having an alias stopped another member from using swear words at your registered alias? So freaking what? You obviously still read the guys response. Be a man and stand up for your opinions.

Your second point - "We should judge the validity of a post by its content..." Do you think this is possible? If someone with no reviews comes on here and gives a glowing review of a sketchy provider, do you give it the same weight as a mini provided my someone like the Beef, who has a proven track record? Of course not. That's the whole point of this site - trustworthy reviews.

Anyone can write anything in this post. Which is why we simply can't trust anything that is said by an alias. Everyone has an agenda.