Hello fellow Hobbyists,

As a newbie hobbyist, am trying to find out what in your experience have been the accuracy percentages of Provider Profiles specifically
- age range
- weight range
- natural or enhanced
- current pictures

My experience is somewhat shaky so far and I was wondering if others face this issue and how they've handled it. If they've not then what do they look for in a profile and I can change how I look at profiles.

Thanks for your help.

Please no flaming. Just because you are accurate in your profile data does not mean that all others are.
Would be helpful if we keep the thread on topic and not all the issues that providers have with Hobbyists.

Lets discuss only accuracy of profiles, please please and please.

Age range - 85%
Weight range - 45% (but I fib as well)
Natural or enhanced - 95%
Current pictures - 75% ( maybe because good photography is expensive)

No flames, just my perceptions.

Welcome to the world of hobbying.  I believe as to TER profiles they are generated by clients writing the review (some real and unfortunately some fake) so just like eye witness accounts, you can get wildly different descriptions/perceptions.  Hopefully there's a review where the client does a good job describing the provider.  In my experience, the largest variations from profiles to IRL are in body type, I find too many times "athletic" or even "thin" is used, but IMO the person may have baby fat, or is a little chunky (now I work out regularly and maybe it's just me but I wouldn't use those descriptors if I think someone is flabby, I have also found that "squirt" is inappropriately used too often).  As to age, a provider told me a good rule of thumb is to add at least 5 years to the age that's advertised, but again I've encountered situations where adding 5 years wasn't enough.  I visited a provider who listed her age in the early 30s, but I found out that she was actually in her late 40s (although she looked young for her age so not that big of a deal).  If you see the word "mature" in an advertisement that's usually a clue that the provider is probably 40+.  What I've found is that it's good to use other hobby sites as a cross check to TER (such as P411, there the profiles are done by the provider and many will indicate if they have had surgical enhancements), read the reviews I have come to trust the opinions of some reviewers, and if you're a VIP send a pm to a reviewer to ask a question.  But what was true 1000s of years ago remains the same today caveat emptor.

Yeah my biggest peeve was when a provider was nearly 30lbs heavier than the picture, and it becomes worse because I look for slender women (not too thin but not chubby). Even though I continued to satisfy the other head, the real head was pissed.

Can understand photos being not current as someone mentioned that price could come into question, but weight, age etc are data that can be edited anytime.  

Its not as if I'm bringing a weighing scale to measure and a few pounds here and there is immaterial but anything over 5-7 lbs difference should be updated in my opinion.

-- Modified on 12/10/2016 11:21:08 AM

I generally don't hold the ads to much more of a standard than I do for what's placed on TV -- most is somewhere between "puffing" and flat out deception even with the concept of truth in advertising. I do think the ads here, on average, are actually more accurate.

When they are off by as much as you're saying I agree it's bad but my experience has been that's only in about the 2-3 % of the cases. Then again, I tend to rely on both the agencies I support and the reviews and back channel sources so place less reliance on the published ad.

I think it's mostly about controlling my own expectations going in -- rather than being set to see the girl that the ad creates some image in my mind I go in hoping to find someone I see as attractive rather than fitting some predefined image. If I get that I'm good with the ad's "accuracy".

I understand about pictures, providers will most likely not look like their pictures.

But since I visit slender providers, someone who lists 130 lbs or so and is then 160 lbs and over, that becomes an issue. What was strange was this provider keeps getting good reviews on looks and I'm wondering if the other hobbyists had gone blind or is there some other reason that prompts them to continue overlooking this fact? This has definitely raised doubts in my mind about the reviews as well because I have first hand knowledge of the provider having visited her.

I am also a newbie with only 5 months experience. In that time I have seen 5 providers. The overall accuracy of the pictures, age, weight etc has been right at 100% with one exception. This may be because I do a lot of research before reaching out to a provider or just have been lucky.  

However, beauty is more than skin deep and that one exception I mentioned turned out to be my favorite 100% GFE girl (I've seen her four times so far). She may be a little heavier now than her pictures portray but the sex is absolutely awesome and the companionship/friendship is even better.  

So how to handle the situation when the door opens up and you are a little disappointed. If it is a blatant case of bait and switch, then leave immediately.  Otherwise give the girl a chance. You may be pleasantly surprised.

Well there's the possible quid-pro-quo of the good review and the possible fake reviews that you need to deal with. One thing I've learned is that researching the reviewer is at least as important as researching the provider if you want to make informed decisions. Even when someone else is trying to objectively and honestly review it might be something as simple as preference for meatier girls and not really seeing much difference between that 130 and 160 -- we only see what we at looking at (our minds filter it all, right) -- so sees no reason to comment in the review.  Finding others who review by similar criteria as you do is important to getting "accurate" reviews