Just saw Star. For what it's worth she told me I was the first to see her here. Nice girl, good time.

Recommended:  Highly! Full review to follow, but an exceptional time.

Rating:  9/10

GFE:  She defines the Girl Friend Experience

Services: DFK (lots), DATY, BBBJ, FBSM, sex in many positions

Rates:  $300/hour

Incall:  yes in Tysons Corner

Outcall:  no

Photos:  accurate

http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion_boards/viewmsg.asp?BoardID=6&MessageID=201400

If she isn't, I'll see her.  If she is, then I'll have to pass.

has posted that I could find are for ladies at Episode Erotic, or, in the time since he started posting about EE ladies, some mini's for Korean - lol - "independents."

Your point is to discredit him and all the ladies he has seen? You have an agenda? Maybe you are one of those supporting other Asian girls, an agency or faux indy assistant?

I looked and can't find any from more than a year ago.

So you think this one is from EE? Really? Maybe you might want to call her assistant and ask.

http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion_boards/viewmsg.asp?MessageID=198927&boardID=6&page=
And his review history over the past 3 years wouldn't back you up.

I'm guessing you are someone that has been denied seeing any of the ladies from EE.

If he has a preference for Asian providers so what?  thanks for all you do Steve and keep ;em coming

with no agenda.

I never said Nicole was with EE - but her own Eros ad says she is independent & Korean, which fits with  my observation.   I also never commented on his extensive review history.  If you are going to post, at least try to be accurate.

And, not that it matters, but I have enjoyed many ladies from EE, and may have even posted a review.

More importantly, why the angry attack on a Board where the purpose of the Board is for hobbyists to share information so other hobbyists can make informed decisions?

OK, So what was it you said?

if people want to trust someone who gives a highly inflated rating of 10 on an unproven provider and then goes to extra lengths defending the said provider who has been revealed far and wide to use flat out fake photos, fake ads, wrong measurements by at least 2 inches, and falsely advertised services.... Lots of luck gentlemen.

Even her own agency admitted and appologized for using fake photos (which they explained was for her own safety. yeah right...MMMmmmhmmm).

I'd strongly recommend waiting for some more trustworthy reviews from people we can trust before diving into this 'star' girl.

PS: I toned-down my post dramatically in order to avoid getting rejected....

Please feel free to press the search button at the top of the page, fill in the author and 999 days and OBSERVE the results.  I'm done with this thread.

That is why I posted the link to Nicole. Your observation must have been while under the influence and slightly inaccurate to say the least. And just for the record, 3 years is 1095 days, not 999.

So based on your observation and statement of his 3 year Mini posting history you came to what conclusion?

Here is his 3 year mini posting history.

Mini - Star: Visiting Independent

Posted 3/28/2011 12:04:19 PM by a6steve
Mini - ChoCo: a visiting independent

Posted 3/13/2011 1:29:40 PM by a6steve
Mini: Charlie - new independent Asian

Posted 3/7/2011 1:44:23 PM by a6steve
Mini - Nicole of EndofOasis

Posted 2/12/2011 4:22:44 PM by a6steve
My Mini!

Posted 2/6/2011 8:39:03 AM by a6steve
Mini – Coco of EpisodeErotic

Posted 1/24/2011 5:30:03 PM by a6steve
I'm seeing her this afternoon

Posted 12/29/2010 7:29:14 AM by a6steve
Mini - Miss Yoko from Episode Erotics

Posted 12/17/2010 8:31:57 PM by a6steve
Mini - Bebe of Episode Erotics

Posted 12/8/2010 10:08:26 PM by a6steve
Friday!

Posted 8/18/2010 8:58:26 PM by a6steve
Displaying 1 to 10 of 10 matches.

Doesn't look like 3 years to me.

OK look at his 3 year posting history  - oh forget that, go look for yourself, like everyone else can and see.

See EE hasn't been around for 3 years. And his review history over 3 years have not been limited to EE

Of my past four reviews, three were for girls from this agency or screener or scheduler or whatever you want to call it.  I know that I personally was misled by a6steve's mini and subsequent review for one of them, and I don't think I was the only one.

There has been a clear downward trend in reviews and ratings for certain girls associated with this organization.  For example, Shi Ho also had high ratings at first for her profile in Virginia Beach, but they quickly spiraled downward which seems to be exactly what happened with her Tysons Corner profile.  I had been considering seeing Shi Ho, but luckily I was able to find her profile beforehand.

I will continue to see girls at this group but I will be waiting for reviewers I can trust, and a6steve is not one of them, especially after his admission of being friends with the owner and helping them out while returning discounts in return.  In fact, I believe this is against the rules as stated here.

http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion_boards/viewmsg.asp?MessageID=75538

I also believe an alias is not to be used to post rude or mean comments, which is what I seem to be seeing in this thread.

But I am not a moderator or administrator, so I do not want to overstep my boundaries and if I have angered anyone, whether it be fellow posters or the staff of TER, I am sorry.  Just putting my two cents in.

If it links to a debate that has been closed by the mods here do not drag it into this discussion. That thread is closed.

If you click Message Board Policies at the top of the board, it has the same MessageID as the broken link...

are actually ladies of EE or other domain names under the same management.

I looked up the multiple profiles for Shi Ho. You know what I see? A tendency of some to give lower ratings on average over others who on average give higher ratings. No trend, just how each scores their experience.

You Saw Charlie and that's the one you feel you were mislead by him right? Who is to say what his experience was or not? I have seen my fair share of ladies who on any given day give outstanding performances and on other days not so good.

It's your choice to follow who you feel gives a reviews that more accurately reflect your rating profile. It appears you have yet to see anyone and consider them above a 7 in looks, two 6's and two 7's. Where many others who have seen the same one rate them significantly higher. So I would say you shouldn't trust the majority to help you since they must inflate their scores also?

As far as what you get for performance, well, I understand why Charlie got the 3. Elizabeth was your best experience so far. But on average you're not getting the best from the ladies you see where others have rated their experiences higher. Maybe it's you? Or maybe the ladies have a bad day? Or the others are inflating their scores?

Rating by point system of 1 to 10 is highly subjective and often inaccurate.

As for helping them out in return for discounts? You must have misunderstood. There are agencies who when a regular client sees a new girl for the first time and pays full fee and gets less than average performance or worse they are offered a discount on their next visit.

He didn't say he gets discounts for reviews or from being a frequent flyer. He said because his experience with one was so bad they discounted his next visit. Of course this is something you are not likely to get unless you frequent  an agency or for that matter an indy. But go on think what you want. It's wrong to become friendly with an agency or indy as it will certainly be perceived by you and others in the wrong way.

My comments while strong are not mean or rude unless you are thin skinned. All I do is read and consider what has been said. I look to see what fact based information can be found. I then consider the benefit it brings to the readers. And if I see it differently than you and provide my arguments that are counter to others doesn't break the rules.

Had the others not started out hiding like me behind an alias maybe I would not have.