She travels to Boston often and nobody has ever reported back on her. Is this a bait and switch? She is very attractive and at $$$ a bargain for her looks even if she's not a total GFE. thanks for your help.

Based on that alone, I'd be suspect and pass.

hey.. How do you know she doesn't have email?  And i've seen many ladies on here who don't, so I'm not sure that's really an issue.  If she's travelling and doesn't bring a laptop, accessing email is pretty tough to do.  A cell phone goes anywhere.

She's cute.. so i'd love to know any experiences with her as well!

--jb

None, of course, have the same phone number.  But one has the
same exact eros link except it's under miami instead of dc.

Definitely her:
http://theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=51548

Probably her also:
http://theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=27558
http://theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=7586

JB, if she doesn't list her email address on her ad and if my only contact with her is through this hobby, I'm not I sure understand what your point is when you say she may have one. While possibly accurate, it's like saying "she does do greek, but not with clients".

The guy asked, I answered. No email, I skip 'em. No offence was meant to you or your choices, but some indication of literacy is as important to me as a nice bod or a full set of teeth.

Lue.. I still don't know what you're talking about.  I'd suspect 75% of the posts on Eros don't have an email address.. If the girls are indie and travel alone and don't bring a laptop, email is worthless to them.  More agencies have email addresses, but review Eros and you'll see many, many ladies without email.  Whats wrong with calling her cell phone?

Not having an email address posted certainly wouldn't be any indication of how intelligent they are.  

And just for the record, it's spelled OFFENSE.. If you're going to critize someone about intelligence, the least you can do is spell correctly yourself!

--JB

JB - You get along with everyone just fine - why don't they get along with you? Or do I have that backwards???

I don't understand it. Did you think he was criticizing you? As I read it, it may have been intended for her and opinions are allowed are they not?

Not sure why I even stepped in on this one, except to say I see another thread losing track of it's original topic and becoming a heated battle of wits and witticism.

Please forgive me if you are not pleased - but I couldn't resist.

And actually I enjoy that stuff - so have at it guys...

And can someone please point me to the Spell Check feature Please. I’ve seemed to have lost it along with this thread. That said - it is spelled "Criticize"

Offense

Main Entry: of·fense

Function: noun
1 : a violation of the law; especially : a criminal act nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy —U.S. Constitution amendment V —see also LESSER INCLUDED OFFENSE
2 in the civil law of Louisiana : an intentional unlawful act that causes damage to another and for which the law imposes an obligation for damages —compare quasi contract at CONTRACT, QUASI-OFFENSE
NOTE: Breach of contract, offenses, quasi-offenses, and quasi contracts are the bases for civil liability under the civil law. Offenses and quasi-offenses are comparable to common-law torts.


offence

n 1: the action of attacking an enemy [syn: offense, offensive] 2: the team that has the ball (or puck) and is trying to score [syn: offense] [ant: defense] 3: a feeling of anger caused by being offended; "he took offence at my question" [syn: umbrage, offense] 4: a lack of politeness; a failure to show regard for others; wounding the feelings or others [syn: discourtesy, offense, offensive activity] 5: a crime less serious than a felony [syn: misdemeanor, misdemeanour, infraction, offense, violation, infringement]



-- Modified on 2/8/2005 5:57:48 PM

i knew i spelled criticize wrong.. It was a fun little irony. And offence is a rately used varient of offense, it's primarily used in England.  It's not a common spelling, and my guess is that wasn't his intent

I knew he wasn't criticizing me.  My only point was he was assuming because a lady didn't have an email address POSTED (it doesn't mean she doesn't have one) on her Eros advertisement, it somehow makes her less than intelligent.  I don't quite understand it since many Eros ads don't have email addresses.. As I've stated, if a lady is travelling, and doesn't bring a laptop, it would be futile to write to her, since she couldn't get the mail anyway.  This is in itself intelligent since she's smart enough to know not to post an email since she'd have no method to read it.

This was never intended to be an argument, just seemed odd how someone arrived at the conclusion that no email equates to stupid.

--jb

...but rather that, without email, I have no basis to evaluate them. Hence my option to skip over them.

You mean: I didn't intend to spell it correctly.

Ouch. I'm embarrassed.