Classic case of he got WAY too caught up which is one of the reasons, as he stated, that i did not want to see him anymore. I absolutely did cancel on him numerous times, which the first handful were because i did not want to see him and afterwards just bad timing. I have never had anyone cross the line with me. This is the first, and last.

I read about this kind of thing ALL the time on the boards, getting caught up in the fantasy. Never thought i would have to deal with it. But sadly i have.

As i stated in an email to him i do have a crazy personal life in which i am trying to work on  things to retire from this industry. And as he stated again he's not the only one i have had to cancel on.

Shit happens, no one else takes it personally. This is a job, for many us, a fantasy, etc, of which i have always enjoyed it for the most part.

My life DOES NOT and WILL NOT ever revolve around this industry or these boards and coming on here to explain myself and have someone write a crock of crap is utterly ridiculous! At what point do you grow up????

I had a special that i ran for a very short period of time to a few select individuals, i even posted it on the board. Yes he was one of them. A few times we had this arrangement. He failed to mention that i spent NUMEROUS FREE, Yes FREE time with him! Right... so in closing this is the last i will speak on this subject. This BS is insanely childish and so not worth anymore of my time.

Talk as much garage as you want Redhead, i don't give a crap. I have way more pressing issues in my life than to worry about you trying to slander my name over a handful of cancelled appointments.

a few years back. I think in 2009.

I am honest to a fault and care very much about my appts and how things affect the friends i have within the hobby.

Far from a rip off Mr. Jake and i give alot more than just "time".

Unless you know me or him i would not pass judgement kind sir.

But thank you for your comment.

I read this review, much to my amazement. I even called another provider, who knows Mea, and she said the same thing. It's funny to read this now after just talking about it.

I've no clue how published that bull crap. They should remove it ASAP

If it's true that he paid you upfront for a package deal, and you haven't fulfilled your part of the deal, then you owe him money. Either pay back his money or fulfill your obligation. The free time you spent with him is irrelevant.

one of the lucky ones who was able to take 'Full' advantage of the special she offered... And for me I enjoyed every moment...

I just read the review.... and after reading Mea's post I can see there is more to this and it sounds fairly personal so as one of Mea's self declared "White Knight's", My Steed and I are just going to watch

how does it qualifies to be a review? If Mea owes him money, then he can certainly post it on the board for open discussion. How does it qualify to be a review?

I do agree with Java, Mea, if your obligation is not fulfilled and this guy is just another creepy hobbyist,  just give it back to the asshole and tell him to fuck off. And yes this shouldn't qualify as a review and should be taken down. He had ample time enough to write a review for you and waits until now, wtf!!!

"I absolutely did cancel on him numerous times, which the first handful were because i did not want to see him and afterwards just bad timing."

You are a Rip off unless you make him whole.  You even admit it.  You don't care about your client's time and what it takes to make arrangements.  

Providers do start taking regular clients for granted at times, while the hobbyists start expecting too much as well. We will do well by reminding ourselves that for providers this is a profession to make a quick buck and exit the industry without any trace. If you want a decent relationship, look for it outside this industry. I learnt this the hard way, though I never let the provider know about my dissapointment.

The guy paid you upfront and you didn't live up to your end of the deal.
If you didn't want to see him anymore, then why couldn't you just refund him his money?

This is what you say -

reviews are permitted when a donatin is made and there is no companionship. if that is what happened in this case, the review should stand.

-- Modified on 10/17/2011 12:42:10 PM

You should ask TER to take it down.

Yeah I think I just read it. If he altered his handle slightly. Dispense with the drama from this jerk. If you did a few sessions with him, pro rate it and give it back. I'm sure you won't have to meet him again, western union or paypal it to him and be done with the schmuck. You're a beautiful woman and don't need this shit in your life!

For the life of me I can not understand why the review board would let this
 BS be posted. It makes no difference whether or not they had a personal
disagreement or not. What relevance has it got to do with her performance?
  I recently was fortunate to spend some time with Mea and I must say it
was my impression, she is a class act and pretty decent person.
  Hopefully Ter will take the proper action here and remove this crap
which  has no basis whatsoever and should not even be considered a review.
 

Maybe next time a coupon book would work better. Like the banks used to issue for your car note, lol.

While Mea is a wonderful lady, and I have nothing but praises for her service.  She is a 9/9 in my book!

This is the type of incident that will preclude me from ever prepaying for services, from anyone.

To much risk involved.

In this case she did not provide said services which constitutes a ripoff. TER would not have approved the review otherwise.

At this point, I am inclined to side with the hobbyist!

Regardless of whether you want to see him again or not. If you accepted money from him for services that have yet to be provided or have no intention to provide agreed upon services to him, you need to refund his money back asap.

The fact that you spent free time with him is irrelevant as it was of your choosing, not his. Sure he might have written a glowing review of you several years ago but that is when you fulfilled your end of the deal. It is a reason why TER created the ability to update reviews. You have failed to fulfill your end of the deal recently and reviewer exercised his right to update his review of you.

The rest of the stuff you talk about in your post is just mumbo jumbo designed to create a distraction from the real issue here.

You took some chump to the cleaners. You do not want to pay him back. You said as much in your post.

First of all, I notice that several members on this thread are taking Mea's sides.

The guy did get ripped off and wrote a review. Someone said the reviews are about performance, but if it was a cash-and-dash there was no performance and the review should be valid.

Some of you said that the Mea is a class act; I pretty sure of that's the case.  Everyone knows the hobby is about fantasy. Of course the providers treat you well; that's their job and you are their clients. I have seen, and heard, the other side. Behind your back, you are talked about and laughed at. You shouldn't be surprised.

As for Mea's comment about having other issues in her private life. Many times I have read that when providers rant on the board, even with legitimate complains. We all have a private life, but if you were my client and I, as a professional, told you that I had issues in my private life and it would not revolve around my professional obligations, what would you think?

White Knights must be angling for some freebies. Mea admittedly took money and didn't honor her obligations and then goes on the Board and characterizes one of her most loyal clients as a loser. Her defense "We don't know her". Unfortunately, if she doesn't fix things with her client, I think we do know her and it's too bad. Review should definitely stay.

because he paid and did not receive services: rip-off.

I mean it's pretty clear to any sensible person that the guy really did get ripped off.  Why did you schedule the guy in the first place just to cancel on him later on  if you knew you did not want to see him? You even admitted it yourself you had done it on multiple occasions. And don't bring your personal life issues in to the mix to try to somehow justify your incompetence in your JOB because that's your problem and you deal with them in your spare time however you want we dont care.  And just because you might have given the guy some free candies in the past  doesn't mean it's ok for you to rob him off money later on.

Over and Over and Over again. There is no rip off here. I've been seeing him for over 3 years. This is a personal vendetta. He goes on to say in the review that i am great girl, etc etc etc... Read the review. It should not be warranted as one.

His review was malicious. He only wrote it because he is sad that she isnt into him like he is into her. Its not about the money and he knows it! I know both parties well and Im shocked he did this, its a douchebag move!
Mea is honest and would make things right ONLY HE NEVER LET HER!!!!!!! He wrote the rip off review in response to her telling him she didnt want to see him again.

-- Modified on 10/18/2011 9:37:20 AM

Did she refund him the unused portion of his prepayment?  That is really the only bottom line.

This is clearly a case of a cash-n-dash, a rip-off that I'm glad we were made aware.  Thank you Mea for bringing your behavior to our attention.  If she can do this to one of her regulars, imagine what else she can scheme.

But the guy is a fool for pre-paying.  That was such a stupid move I almost don't feel sorry for him.

If we were to believe what he said, he gave her many months (May - Oct) to either see him or give back his money.  Mea's story doesn't dispute any of this.  So the guy finally writes a rip-off review five months later.  I would say that was plenty of time for Mea to have made amends but she didn't.  She took the money and announces her retirement.  Classic thievery.

You guys are bashing her and acting like/assuming he is being 100% honest and he is not. He wrote this being malicious and sprinkled in a few lies. Do you know him or his character? NO chances are you dont but I do and I know how things got. He fabricated most of what happened.
Why would she bring this up if she knew she was wrong in any way? She admitted her faults. Obviously shes pissed that he jumped to the level that he did instead of actually trying to handle this like a mature adult.
He's mad that she ended the relationship, not about the money and he lied to try to hurt her.


Guys lie in reviews all the time to either pump up their ego or pump up the girls business. This is no different only he's using TER to try to ruin her business.

Why bring this up on a board, that your life dose not revolve aroun? The reviewer didn't sound upset about the money. He sounded upset you continued to schedule only to cancel time and time again.

What happened to honesty and integrity? I don't think it's to late to keep some of your integrity. Refund the unused portion.

I don't think the guy got ripped off.  He spent time with a woman that is out of his league.  At the worst he prepaid and lost a couple appointments.  Mea probably doesn't have the money any longer.  If he knows her he then knows her situation so why demand the money back.  You want these women to treat you like a girlfriend, let it go and treat her like a boyfriend would.  Let it go and stop embarrassing yourself and her.

"At the worst he prepaid and lost a couple of appointments"

That is the jest of his review.  He prepaid, she admitted he prepaid, and that she was both blowing him off and having problems with scheduling.

Bottom line is the customer paid for services that have not been rendered and he should be refunded on a prorated basis.

Personal issues have absolutely nothing, I repeat, nothing, to do with business!  If she opted to not see him again, that is her decision and as such she should refund his prepaid gift - period.  Had she done that, in a timely manner, I doubt we would be having this discussion.

If so, you owe him.

Yes, I'm serious.

she owes him at least a few sessions or a refund.

treating him / her like a girlfriend boyfriend is completely besides the point.

Did you read emails? Did you listen on 3 way to conversations? Did you read text?
You THINK you know him well. You dont because you havent had a disagreement with him.
You dont know Mea so you need to chill

***edited by moderator***

-- Modified on 10/18/2011 4:19:57 PM

If you pay for something, the expectation is you get what you pay for.

If you do not get what you pay for, the expectation is a refund.

Since you seem to have a hard time understanding, let me put this into an analogy for you:

If you walk into a Mercedes dealership and hand them a check for $50k for a new car only to get home and find out that it was a demo, how long do you give the dealership to make it right before you start asking for your money back?  How many times do you visit the dealership asking for your car before you file a lawsuit and/or go to the BBB?

Does that make it "easier" for you to understand?  

The bottom line is that the reviewer paid for services that have not been delivered - as blatantly stated by Mea.  Hence, he is due a refund.

And as I stated earlier, having seen Mea on several occasions, she is a wonderful lady and I hope to see her again before she retires.   The issue is that this was not handled, or does not appear to have been handled, appropriately.

OMG you actually base your self worth on being in the top 100 LMAO You're tacky to say the least. He has showed you emails/text that he wants you to see Lol you arent getting the whole truth. NEWS FLASH, you never will Lol You clearly feed on this type of drama. As a provider I would never get involved in situations like this. When a client talks shit I listen like I care and then never think twice about it. Its sad that you actually get involved like this. Get a life and wipe off that lil brown nose of yours.
Strawberry blonde/red, you know what the hell she was saying so quit being snarky.

*Finished with this*

Mea -

Oh, now I see.  Buying a car and and your hobbying are equal and same.    No reviews.  I tend to think it lowers the reviewed to an animal.

You dont know how busy ANY lady is Lol What, are you an accountant for escorts? Ooooooh they tell you that they're busy and business is great Lol You have no idea.
You dont know any thing for fact, you know a bunch of he said she said

k

DO NOT accept free time.  Ever!  This was the catalyst.  

AkA GaGa

An opinion is MUCH different than facts. You dear do NOT know the facts. She did not rob or rip him off and she never said that so read again dummy. You dont give a shit about emails? Soooo you're taking his word? Wow!  You're going by what he says to you and as a provider that is stupid. One man tells you a bunch of BS and yet she has dozens of reviews describing her as a nice woman....Hmmmmm break out your calculator bimbo.
Im involved because she is my long time friend. Your client is NOT your friend Lol or who knows, maybe he is....again, I urge you to get a life.
I have a real problem with providers bashing other providers, especially a reputable provider, based on what ONE client says. READ IT AGAIN...Mea has had a great reputation all of the 4+ years she has provided and ONE guy accuses her of something and you're stinking you nasty nose in it calling her names like thief and so on. You are the childish one honey and you're a fool for believing your clients more than some one Im sure you've ask for references from in the past Lol
Use your tiny little brain for 5 seconds and Im sure you can understand why your lil strawberry blonde boyfriend might leave out a few key details to you and why he may have fabricated that rip off review just a little. Try hard!
And while your at it drop the internet gangster antics Lol You're laaaaaaaame in real life and guess what? There is a real world outside your hotel room

he has spoke with me several times about this issue and was reluctant to write a review, post or anything else and was debating on just dropping it- WTF..NO WAY!! I "personally" know that he has wrote & called her many times over a LONG period of time with NO LUCK of getting the pre-paid appts that was promised. As un-smart as it was, and I have expressed this to him, that he paid in advance for a "package" (lmao)- FACTS ARE FACTS..You offered him a "deal", he paid as requested and did NOT receive the goods! Unbelievably you admit it yet somehow think he's in the wrong by writing that review- HA! In my opinion this kinda BS leaves a BAD taste in the mouth of hobbiest for all of us "stand-up" providers who run "specials" and/or require an upfront deposit. I know theres NOWAY its gonna happen but you should DEF give him his LARGE sum of loot back before you "retire" as you told him (lmao). Besides, what you do/did in your "free time" has not shit to do with the "special package" you offered and hes not a redhead,lmao how many did ya "get" on this deal?

RAAAArrrr!! HaHaHa!!  Smiles & DFKS Bae-ba!

The name-calling and derogatory insults by ASSistant69 on behalf of Mea pretty much tells me that Mea has something to hide.  Mea and ASSistant69 have lost all credibility when they start with the verbal assault.

ASSistant69, you keep harping that we don't know the facts yet you give no facts.  We can only go on what has been posted.
Mea's original post admitted she cancelled on him several times because she no longer wanted to see him.  It's a dick move to keep on scheduling and cancelling on someone who prepaid you.  The guy's review did not trash Mea at all.

And just because Mea has many good reviews means little in this instance....she may very well have taken advantage of her "good" reputation in order to pull off this thievery.

Regardless of anyone's opinion, Mea's reputation has taken a hit.  Good thing she's retiring.  But a thief like that will always be back.

Or she's using "retirement" as an excuse to cut off communication with those she's ripped off.

Ok, I want to end this once and for all. It's all heresay! She said that she fulfilled her commitment, but others have chimed in with their POV. Mea's original post is a little hard to understand. As she talks about missed opportunities to meet and scheduling conflicts, it does sound like she didn't fulfill her commitment, but just because the wording isn't put into it's proper context, doesn't mean she didn't live up to the client's expectations. On the other hand, she and someone else, familiar with the situation said that she did live up to her end of the bargain.

All I wanna say is this. Get it in writing! If you agree to meet someone for X amount of visits for X amount of dollars, have it in writing. A contract for a personal appearance is not illegal. Celebrities, atheletes, politicians all do it. I mentioned before, she should have given him coupons that he could use for each "appearance", to demonstrate that the contract was fulfilled.

Either way, he says he got ripped off, she said that she lived up to the agreement. A judge would look at the evidence and conclude in her favor with the overwhelming number of reviews on her. I would like to know this? Where are the other clients who took advantage of this pre-pay offer, and why don't they stand up for her. I mean come on guys, WTF?

It is quite common for providers who accept prepay arrangements to continually schedule appointments with paid clients and then cancel before the scheduled time.

It is the one of the oldest tricks in the books.

The idea is to give the client the impression that she is trying or acting in good faith and fully intends to fulfill her end of the deal without having him feel that he is getting ripped off and go public. The longer it takes for word to get out, her reputation is still intact and she is able to pull in cash.

This situation does not surprise me. The two groups of providers likely to pull such a scam are providers who are experiencing financial difficulty and are most likely to default. Think about it, a provider on sound financial footing has no reason to offer a package deal and give up future income unless she feels necessary to hang on to her customer base.

The other group are providers likely to retire, disappear or go to UTR mainly because they become untraceable.

Lesson here is, the same rules that applies to regular business applies to the hobby as well.

As a matter of fact I HAVE READ EMAILS And I do know him VERY well for years. I have had disaggrements w him but unlike this situation - I DIDNT RIP HIM OFF and thats the point! Youre correct about me not knowing Mea...I dont associate w/ con artist. He's NEVER bad mouthed her in ANY way! Hes only asked my advice on the subject. He was dead set on dropping it however Im SOO glad he didnt, so others will not fall for this BS! Unlike him..IM NOT SCARED of ANY threats of harm! Honey..I dont need to "fish for clients", Have you seen the top DC 100? DUH! ROFLMAO @ U! Your her BF and I understand you sticking up for her however this is a "discussion" board and SHE started this discussion! You yourself knows after a year and 14 cancelations thats EXACTLY what happend, SHE RIPPED HIM lol! He need not tell me BS, whats would the purpose be?  Hes not married nor is he a red head, hes light strawberry blonde, lol. IM NOT confused at all! ***edited by moderator***! Yes, 4 yrs w/no bs until she decides to "retire" - Its really pretty cut n dry, she states it herself! BTW...I AM THAT SPECIAL!  hehehe  

-- Modified on 10/18/2011 4:35:06 PM

ABSOLUTELY - I know.

Just the right song for that... lol

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nf-Ij_Yi5tE

All I know is that the guy paid for pre-paid and didn't get the service. Plain and simple.
Yet white-knights are trying to take sides with the OP.

Knowing some of the top ladies personally, I can confirm that gals in the top list don't even need to advertise or fish for clients. It might be one of the worst recessions in history but not for these ladies. In fact some just choose to go under the radar. They're also very selective of who they see and vouch for.

So, IMHO, Pamela's post adds a whole new level of credibility for the reviewer.

Mea pay him back and post that you did. If he is a stand up guy he posts that you did. Otherwise you have put yourself out there as a ROB

Wow, this got kinda heated...  I don't know Mea, but I do empathize based on her post explaining a complicated personal life...  My sincere sympathies.  

The trouble with "deals" and "prepays" and all that stuff is that promises get made, and while it is definitely an unreasonable expectation for hobbyists, hobbyists kinda expect their schedules to be catered to by the provider in those situations...  When that doesn't happen, I think it's hard not to feel like you did not get what you paid for.  

Alas, I think things got out of control and 'Ela was providing her own POV.  We're all entitled to our opinions (isn't that what a forum is for?), and while bad reviews do hurt - I'm not naive or stupid enough to think otherwise - HONEST reviews are all that matters.  As long as reviews are honest - and TER does provide the forums for providers to share their own POV - TER is doing its job in giving hobbyists all the information possible.  

Everyone should know by now that EVERY experience is - and frankly SHOULD be - YMMV based on chemistry, mutual attraction, etc.  Let everyone share their HONEST experience, let providers share their HONEST explanation, and it's left to hobbyists to process all the information made available properly.  I should hope people on TER would be thinking about aberrant reviews in the midst of glowing ones and just realize YMMV and/or maybe it was an off day.  

Anyway, I'm not taking sides, but I'm all for 100% HONEST information being made available and for their being an equal means for defense/explanation - exactly as has been done.  Just my 2 cents...

lol- Who said ANYTHING about "self worth". I was proving my point in not having to "fish for clients"...Get a grip chick! Pretty lame and childish with you name calling babe, thats sad. Tacky is you defending a con job, proof is in her post ha! You say you would never get involved, can you please explain to us wtf your doing then? I do not actually give 2 shits about seeing emails, she said it herslf in her post DUH. WTF are you missing here..a brain? I do agree with you about this being drama, however I rarely respond to ANY posts unless I KNOW WTF IM TALKING ABOUT and DEF DO NOT "feed off of it". Well, I suppose you not giving a shit has got you here sticking up for a theif eh? "brown nose" hun, its obvious your the brown noser here, wtf I am "brown nosing"... a client, a friend - doubtful - no need to- I get it EITHER WAY...do you? Im just responding to what I KNOW is WRONG..SHE took the bank and ran! 14 times canceling with over a year to make it good..come on lol. No, actually I dont speak "thief" so no idk what the hell shes talking about, theres a diff.
*AS YOU SHOULD BE!*

P.S.  I respect Ela going to bat for a client and sharing an honest and genuine feeling.  Another reason you're amazing 'Ela - lots of loyalty and dedication!  :-*

Services that were paid or prepaid were canceled or otherwise not provided.

the fact that there was agreed OTC time is completely irrelevant. If you agree to OTC time then it DOESN'T count against the prepaid amount. Period. End-of-story.

The review was kind.

well then someone must be more drunk than I am. lol

I don't even bother seeing ladies who aren't at least in the top 100.
The only exception would be if the girl not in the top 100 has strong recommendations from someone I trust or from somewhere else.

good grief I didn't say take it to court, but sometimes when there is something in writing there is more of a commitment. It would be easy to take someones money up front for services never rendered without some sort of documentation and then never perform them, what recourse is there? Certainly not court but perhaps legal mediation. Afterall the woman is an "escort" not a "prostitute". The money paid is for companionship, not sex, REMEMBER?

Ass,
My bet is that you don't know the facts any better than anyone else or you may have additional information from the provider but if you think that they are always 100% honest, you're either a dope or on it.  Just going by what the provider admits in her post, this isn't a tough call.  She is wrong.  She was paid and did not perform.  She readily admits that she cancelled appointments because she didn't want to see him, which is totally fine once you've given his money back and she clearly has not done that.  I have to assume that she felt like her rep in the community is so good that she could get some sympathy from the board.  Fortunately, this is an honest forum where people are willing to call bullshit when they see it.  This, sir, is bullshit.  If you can't see that, I don't know what else to tell you.

You didn't have to admit that the OP was a friend, it was abundantly clear from the venom in your posts and your general level of douchebaggery.  You said you were done with your posts, please be true to your word.  Perhaps you can spend some time with the OP if you are so close.  Just don't pay her in advance.

Pay him back HIS money!!!!!

Other than making the not so smart decision to prepay in the first place, I don't see how the reviewer could have handled the situation with any more class.  I can't believe the OP actually started this thread, where she doesn't even bother to deny the accusations, thinking a majority of hobbyists would think that she's in the right.  As for those who don't find anything wrong with what she did, exactly what is your definition of a rip-off?  Service was offered.  Payment was made.  Service was not provided (after repeated attempts).  Refund was not given.  Sounds like the textbook ripoff to me.

Maybe.  But he's had free time in the past as well.  Tit for tat is how I see it.

At the very most, she could offer him time, if she wants to and he's willing to accept.  However, payment returned is not even in the realm of possibilities after what he's done.  
 
AkA GaGa

I beg to differ.  
OTC time?  No such thing and trust me you will pay some how some way if you continue to see her.  Most men who steal time of the clock do it and never see the lady again.  His sick way of getting over.  

Besides, what about the countless no call no shows by men everyday.  I even hear stories of men actually showing up and still no profit.  Let a lady get on the board and rant and rave how she demands payment from a no call no show.  You men would tell her better luck next time.

Your attitude is completely one dimensional.  

I would bet if he never stole time of the clock she would have seen him again.  
Yes, giving more time than what was agreed upon is her choice, but not sending her payment for it after he stole it is his choice as well.

Once again...there's no such thing as free time or time off the clock.  

AkA GaGa

First some full disclosure: I have had one "very good" experience with Mea, but not ever reviewed here. Her "girls" are to die for.

HE is a moron for getting too involved.

HE is also a moron for pre-paying. She is, afterall, a hooker. Sooner or later ALL hookers will start asking for pre-payments, and it never goes well. Off the scene from Top Gun, " Here ego is writing checks her pussy can't cash." It is always too bad when this happens, as many of these ladies are really nice, as was Mea.

SHE is a moron for dragging him along. I guarantee if she wasn't looking for some easy money she would have cut him of sooner. Both parties need to cross the line for the fantasy to go bad.

She seems to have clearly stated all facts except for one, which she has clearly avoided. She admits to taking his money and waffling about, but ultimately not, seeing him. She does not comment about still owing him money or his claims of her owing him money. Now, anytime you have "hooker said" - "john said" you're asking for trouble. However, Mea made enough comments that (IMO) the absence of any commentary on her still owing him money is pretty damning evidence against her.

This is all too bad and we should all take heed at the lesson here. Never loan money, to anyone (especially hookers and family - they are the worst) unless you are willing to completely write it off.

That is water under the bridge, and, by the way... how do you think he got the idea that maybe there was some fire to go with the smoke. Freebies are the first bad step to some guy thinking you really like him as a BF.

Calling someone a theif when you don't know all the facts?  You know his side but you would think different if you heard Mea's.  You won't hear her's, but I can tell you she is not a theif or con artist, no more then any provider because basically thats what providers do in the business sense.  Sales or sales people sometimes use a soft con.  Anyway, I also prepaid because I like Mea and I could help.  I never had a problem scheduling in fact a long time passed (months) and she contacted me.  I saw her within the last week and she wouldn't even accept a tip.  I left it on the table anyway.  So I hope this ends the thread and everyone stops judging because you don't know the facts.  

-- Modified on 10/20/2011 1:41:23 AM

-- Modified on 10/20/2011 1:55:54 AM

That all this had to be played out on the boards... I for one love Mea and have had no issues ever with her... that said, as I mentioned early on in this thread I am a self proclaimed Mea White Knight, but I choose to sit this one out... why? because I think we can all agree that we really only have part of this story, and not that its missing a side to chime in on, its missing them working this out in private...

Even if it wasn't Mea, I would question if the review counted as an encounter.. I have had reviews rejected because it didn't have enough detail about the said encounter, and the date at which the any "encounter" happened is in question (As it really doesn't seem like anything happened on a specific date) so reading this without prejudice, I found it surprising that it was allowed to be posted....

Does she "Owe" him money? Maybe, Maybe not... I really don't know as I am not the judge or jury who has heard both sides clearly and completely deliver their story...

I for one would not call for heads to roll unless I was privy to 'All" the conversations (From both sides) and understood where things got wonky... I don't fault anyone for stating an opinion and I think Mea probably has some regrets for starting this thread...

My only hope is that we stop having this played out in such a Jerry springer fashion...

or should we chant Fugly! Fugly! Fugly!

This he said she said BS sure does get high ratings

Both the OP and the reviewer appear, to be respectable individuals however this thread makes them both look silly.

NObody wins this one...

This probably won't get posted, and sorry to add late to the discussion. But my experience with Mea supports the reviewer.

I never saw Mea. Tried three times, but she always canceled at the last moment. Always a life commitment or some "legitimate" excuse. So, couldn't call her a NC/NS.

After the last time she asked me to reschedule for a fourth appointment. I never did, and based on 4newbie2's experience, she would have likely continued to cancel.

Life is too short to waste time and she wasted several evenings of my time.

....This comment suggest she is/has financial problems.  Hence does this play into her unwillingness or inability to refund the money?

I've never seen Mea and though I've tried to post reviews of other providers I've seen- none of them have been accepted.  Guess I need to put more detail.
In any event, this thread highlights one thing for me- the fact that a provider has stolen money from a client.  I don't care how beautiful she is, or how insane her blowjobs are- I will not be seeing her.

and will not be seeing this provider- whom was on my list to see- now that this has come to light.