Visiting DC the weekend of Mar 13-14 and would like to meet an older woman. 55+ especially. Mature section on Eros seems to show mostly ladies in early 40s.

divulge that they are above 55, would experience loss of business. There are plenty of those out there who are above 55, but would never say so in public, or some of them even privately.

I would suggest that privately follow Michelle's leads.

I don't mean to be a jerk, but I'm certainly not going to recommend anyone I know without knowing whether or not you have an established board presence. And yes, I'm responding using an alias, I do tend to see mature ladies and I'm not looking to give indirect recommendations either. Sorry.

I tend not to be so binary in my approach in dealing with board members.  

I've talked plenty of times with board Aliases like AnotherDonJohn, AsianManNova and Panthera12, and given and received good recommendations from them. We all are aliases on the fuck board, and some people wouldn't want to to advertise their review counts or review history.  Let me tell you a little secret about myself.. My real name is not CurlyW - Nats Fan...shhhhhhh lol....

The nature of the post, whether it was well meaning or shit stirring makes more difference to me than whether I could see the person's review count or the retarded yellow envelope. And I think this was a very well meaning post. Why he decided to take the 2nd step of using an alias.. Only he knows.. And frankly, its not even important to me..

-- Modified on 3/3/2014 10:07:09 PM

The difference is even though AnotherDonJohn, AsianManNova and Panthera12 are using aliases, I recognize them as having a significant board presence and I can make a judgement as to whether I want to give out a recommendation to them.

I'm not going to pretend that I'm doing the screening for the ladies I've seen, but if I see something in a requester's reviews that might raise a concern to me, or if every forum posting they make is some sort of out there rant, then I'm unlikely to offer up a recommendation. It's really that simple. Most of the time this won't be the case, but I respect the ladies I've seen enough to exercise some caution. If someone doesn't want to expose their reviewing history but is willing to say "by the way I post heavily on the Kansas City board under this alias", then I'd know something about them in order to make a judgement, that's all.

And you tend not to be so binary in your approach in dealing with board members? Really? Are you kidding me? You're extremely binary when it comes to things that interest you or align with your views, and things that don't. Aren't you the one that used to jump on anyone posting an ISO, calling them lazy and declaring that you just had different values, or work ethics or some other such crap? Or how about your little rant about people looking for restaurant recommendations? I think you said something to the effect that things were better in the old days when the moderators wouldn't have allowed it. I guess it fell into the Doesn't Interest Curly trap. Rather than just ignoring those posts, it was predictable that you'd jump in and fire your shot even though others found the posts of sufficient interest to reply. Not so binary in your approach? I don't think so. But I guess you're free to enjoy/conduct hobby as you see fit as well.

everyone should do their homework whenever they can. I pick on those lazy dumb asses who want us to do all their homework.. Trying to find specific info about someone who is in that age range is not possible w/o inside information. That's why the request was valid. Tell me how to search for what he is looking for then I will shut up. On the other hand looking for DFK, in downtown DC, 25-35, and Blonde is not hard..In fact I don't even need search for that.  

It must be finally feel like someone powerful when you have some information but don't want to share. Very infantile. And how hypocritical of you to pontificate on use of aliases when you are using one yourself.....lol..

If you want to equate discretion with witholding information as part of a power trip, so be it. We just see things differently. And I never said I had any issues with anyone using an alias, I just think you should be willing to identify yourself to some degree, within the normal parameters of anyone identifying themselves on this board, if you are going to ask others to share intel or make recommendations. It's not that I don't want to share information, I have and will continue to when I have some idea who I am sharing it with. Apparently you don't see a need for discretion, just share everything with everybody. Who cares if they only have two reviews and complain in both of them that the bitches wouldn't agree to bbfs, so they just tried to sneak in cim when the ladies specifically said they don't do that either? Not my problem. Here's the name of my favorite provider, go ahead and give her a call. Now I realize there aren't a lot of guys like that and chances are KennyDD is a normal, reasonably sane hobbyist. But I just prefer to do a quick sanity check before making a recommendation. It's really that simple. So again, if you want to view that as a power trip, then that's your prerogative.  

And the idea that you would call anybody infantile is just laughable. You regularly throw little tantrums about what other people post when it doesn't meet your definition of what should be allowable on this board, and call people names like some petulant child. You were just on another thread earlier calling another hobbyist and a provider idiots for not immediately recognizing what PV stood for. I really don't think that you have any standing to judge the maturity of anyone else on this board.

Enjoy the hobby the way you feel is safe.. I would rather someone not share and err on side of caution. But to post saying that you have info and don't want to share was a tad bit infantile.. IMHO.

You sound like a 7 yr old kid who just uncovered a stash of treats and goes "Neener, Neener" taunting the other kids who got there a tad bit late..


-- Modified on 3/5/2014 7:42:49 AM

END OF MESSAGE