Washington DC

My 2 cents.....
Beg2differ 32 reads
posted
1 / 31

He rated you a 7 in looks and 9 in service??
The scoring is subjective - maybe to him you were a 7 and to someone else a 10??

Looking at your pictures, at first glance, your age seems to be lower than suggested and it appears you may have bolt-ons - could be he went a point or two lower for that reason...??

I'd just take it in stride and not worry about it....  Your ratings are fine.

cks175 51 Reviews 62 reads
posted
2 / 31

Maybe you had a reason, but if TER gets the idea that you are enacting a no review policy, they will delist you.

discretionist 40 reads
posted
3 / 31

I think making this post to complain about a good review is going to hurt more than the actual review score itself...

-- Modified on 7/10/2023 1:44:24 AM

vigerous 27 Reviews 22 reads
posted
4 / 31

How right you were... she's no longer listed. Bad move on her part.  
 
But then again, why was she asking him to not review her in the first place? I guess that'll remain a mystery.

Overshare 28 reads
posted
5 / 31

Some guys love that look, hence all the 10s b4 she delisted. The botox, lip fillers and fake boobs have never been for me. The looks scoring is incredibly subjective. She also provided a pse experience all inclusive at a great price, so sometimes a hot experience inflates the looks score.

1980STT 93 Reviews 19 reads
posted
6 / 31

Odd for the OP to think posting and calling out another client would help her cause.  I prefer real clients post real reviews.  Too many fake ones already.

Overshare 27 reads
posted
7 / 31

Now when someone looks her up here, all they'll find is this post, not the many many 10/10 and 9/10 reviews she had.

vigerous 27 Reviews 17 reads
posted
8 / 31

In light of what you just said about her major-leagues numbers, now I really don't know what to make of it. It was like a weak act of professional suicide. Good thing TER isn't the center of the universe some think it is, but it ain't nothin' neither.
 
Anybody know off hand if there's recovering from this, on seeking redemption at the feet of TER? My guess is she's been around for while. A girl doesn't get numbers like that without a reason. I could see getting caught up in a string of successes and not wanting it to end. I'll bet there're enough guys who gave her those high scores who would vouch for her, um, good character? as part of an appeal. Or whatever... oh man.🙄

MoeB10 16 Reviews 23 reads
posted
9 / 31

Saw her about 3 years ago,‘first time and gave her 8/8…very strong especially for initial encounter. Most since then had been 9 & 10’s, don’t know if she became obsessed with needing those but even though she provides true PSE(which is rare in these parts) , I would likely never leave a 10/10 for anyone. Here’s hoping she comes to her senses…

Lingolingosiseler 165 Reviews 18 reads
posted
10 / 31
vigerous 27 Reviews 24 reads
posted
11 / 31

Her website is enough to make me want to give a 'white' girl another chance. Sounds like it's pretty much a guarantee if PSE is what you like... and I like. And with that hair, if she really has green eyes and not hazel, that's a killer combo. lol.
 
When you say, "I hope she comes to her senses," I'm reading that to be referencing her lust for high scores and not her behavior outlined in the OP. Getting trapped in something like "my self-worth ∝ my scores" can get pretty close to OCD. It could take something like this to get her to get her to lighten up and live with the fact it's not entirely in her control. Can't live and die by those numbers.
 
Who knows what influenced *his* decision, whether he agreed to her wishes at first, if he's just a jerk. I recently went back into a review I wrote and upped the P score from 6 to 7 because I remembered that my libido was off that day and was responsible for at least one of the negative points. Maybe he had a lousy time and it was mostly because his dog died and his girl left him... the day before.😟😭

gunpatrol 9 Reviews 74 reads
posted
12 / 31

I’ve known and seen her IVY for  years,  she’s a solid provider, on time, honest about rates, her pics are real, money and sending deposits etc. IVY was wrong outing someone about a review that wasn’t to her liking or even asking to do a review or not -  that’s rigging the system we depend on , I agree some get all caught up in their numbers but we all need real honest subjective reviews. I support TER and the rules and how the platform is managed. We’re grateful  to have TER. I hope this is a temporary suspension I did reach out to her and ask WTF? She’s mortified ! and will follow the rules of our hobby and guidelines going forward if she’s allowed  back.

AsianManNOVA 22 reads
posted
13 / 31

My SB also did the same thing to her lips. She was very natural-looking before and that's the way I like it. Now I find her less attractive. I hope this is just a suspension as I don't think her mistake deserves a lifetime ban. (Threatening to out a client or to put him on a blacklist definitely deserves a lifetime ban.)  People do use TER so this will definitely hurt her business somewhat.

team_rocket_qwerty 35 Reviews 25 reads
posted
14 / 31

I will not see that provider.

 

Or tell her sorry, cannot promise anything at all.  
And see what she has to say.

jjwill1664 2 Reviews 174 reads
posted
15 / 31

At the risk of further inflaming things, I did want to clarify briefly with my version of events here. In Ivy and I's initial discussions, she asked for my TER username and she noted that I had not left any reviews. I said "I don't leave reviews", which at the time was true because I am relatively new to the hobby and even newer to TER. I thought she merely was commenting on it because she wanted to see how some of my other interactions have gone or perhaps to reach out to other providers as part of screening. I did not take that as stating or pledging not to leave a review, though apparently she did. It was a very unfortunate miscommunication that I regret. I think my read of the situation is the more logical one, but I can see how she would've read it that way and can also see how a review with scores lower than she aims for would've upset her even more when she had not anticipated a review at all from our encounter.

I agree that Ivy was in the wrong for putting me on blast about the review, but she has reached out and apologized. I also understand her being upset with my rating, though I standby what I wrote in what I think overall was a quite positive review if you read it. In my first reviews I wanted to follow the rating system as laid out in TER guidelines closely, and I felt "7-Attractive" more closely represented my personal feelings than "8- Really Hot" or "9-Model Material". But I also standby the "9-Forgot It was a Service" as it was likely the best PSE I've had in my relatively short time in the hobby. I had a great time and prior to all of this I would've recommend her without reservation.**

Anyway, I just wanted to clarify both for my own sake but also because I believe this was a one-off miscommunication and I understand delisting her for a bit to sort out the situation, but I think overall it's not worthy of a lifetime ban and I hope they bring her back with all of her other great reviews soon.  

**As an aside/demonstration of my desire to adhere to the rules, the only reason I did not give her a 10 in performance was because I was following the review guidelines of "An escort provider is only eligible to earn up to a 7, unless she performs one or some of the following during a session: Kisses With Tongue, Bare-Back Blow Job, Really Bi, Anal Sex, or More than One Guy. For each of these services that are performed, her potential max score is raised by one point, with 10 as an absolute maximum." In our session we only did KWT and BBBJ, so my read is that leads to a max score of 9. Perhaps  in a similar future encounter I would just award a 10 here, as I am not into anal so this is more of a choice rather than a reflection on the provider.

team_rocket_qwerty 35 Reviews 24 reads
posted
16 / 31

So you didn't even promise no reviews nor has she actually asked for you to not write them.

 
And to top it off you actually wrote her a quite positive review of 7/9 which is pretty high, some of us have never given a rating like this before.

 
If this is all true, not sure what the hell the provider was thinking. She turned this whole situation into a mess over what, a couple of points on your already quite positive review?

 
I can only imagine what thos provider would do if she has received a less favorable review. Like a three/six for example. Yikes.

AsianManNOVA 49 reads
posted
17 / 31

You are a newbie so you are not familiar with the TER scoring for looks. You gave her 7 for looks. I assume you compare her to women/girls you see in the real world. However, many seasoned mongers give scores for looks based on comparisons to other providers. A TER 10 is probably an 8 IRL at best. Plus, a lot of clients give inflated scores either to curry favor with the provider or they don't want to be harassed by the provider (I personally experienced it several times). The scores for K-girls are probably more reliable since clients do not fear the repercussions from the providers/agencies hence they are usually lower.

As for performance, it's not required that she actually performs a certain sex act with you to get an extra point. As long as she provides that service, she is eligible for the extra point. You don't like anal so you didn't ask for it, but she does provide it so she is eligible.

davincib1 96 Reviews 43 reads
posted
18 / 31

Ivy is a good lady IMO, from her rates, to her looks, to her service she is top notch in my book.  She doesn't deserve this.  I'll be the first guy to call a chick out on their bs, and have done this several times in the past on the boards.  As far as looks go, I understand they are subjective, but IMO she's more of a 8 or 9.   And that's with me comparing her to another blondie like Sasha Stolin who I rated a 10.  But that's just me, and I like man-made, ass, and a toned physique.  I think there are enough providers in the game these days that are simply overpriced and underwhelming as far as service goes, Ivy isn't one of them, and IMO TER should try and keep as many of the good ones around.  

team_rocket_qwerty 35 Reviews 50 reads
posted
19 / 31

TER has pretty self-explanatory rating explanation. If the provider doesn't agree with how ter ratings work, it's her problem. Nowhere does in ter rules does it say that TER 10 is a 8 IRL at best. This is just nonsense created, I think, to prop up providers and ensure better biz. Which goes against the concept of reviews on the first place.

 

"Plus, a lot of clients give inflated scores either to curry favor with the provider or they don't want to be harassed by the provider (I personally experienced it several times)."

 
And this is a big problem too. Providers who can take a dick bit who can't take an honest review. Providers who cannot seem to comprehend that reviews aren't for their consumption, the reviews aren't for their biz. They are by us. For us. FUBU. If providers take offense to their reviews that are honest, they're in a wrong profession. Find an occupation that doesn't have public rating of your job.

cks175 51 Reviews 31 reads
posted
20 / 31

Basically, she was under the impression you didn’t write reviews (true up until your review of Ivy) and then was upset when the review showed up with a below average score. It doesn’t seem like she even asked you not to write a review, even though that’s what she wrote in the original post (written when she was understandably upset).

Like you said, I think this is all a big miscommunication, and hopefully the appeal to the TER Admins will be considered favorably.

team_rocket_qwerty 35 Reviews 21 reads
posted
21 / 31

"when the review showed up with a below average score. It doesn’t seem like she even asked you not to write a review, even though that’s what she wrote in the original post (written when she was understandably upset).
"

 
In other words, distilling through the bullshit, she has LIED.
Why should anyone trust her? Ohhhh I get it, because she was "understandably upset" it's OK to lie. Riiight.

cks175 51 Reviews 52 reads
posted
22 / 31

little piece of shit like you would twist her words like that. The reviewer and Ivy both acknowledged that it was a miscommunication.

Why don’t you go back to your Bay Area forum and chase windmills there?

team_rocket_qwerty 35 Reviews 28 reads
posted
23 / 31

She doesn't deserve what?
She lied and got prerty upset she got a 7/9 review?

 
And if she got a three in looks what the fuck would her reaction be?

Each provider deserves every score she gets, provided the client was truthful and honest in his evaluation.

team_rocket_qwerty 35 Reviews 41 reads
posted
24 / 31

Someone is mad I'm calling spade a spade. Oooh here comes an ad hominem too.  

Lol at me twisting words when the very first post in this thread states  

 
"If someone asks a client not to do a review for whatever reason and they agree"  

I know what I've read. I have it screenshoted too.  

If she were under oath, there is no shot you could ever label it as a "misunderstanding" or any other bullshit.  

 
Seller (or white knight) wants come at a client they better not miss and watch what they say. Aint fun when rabbit has the gun eh?  

 
Mongers rights and truth >>> providers biz. Deal with it.

davincib1 96 Reviews 40 reads
posted
25 / 31

I'm saying she doesn't deserved to get banned.  My reasoning for saying that is there is enough trash out here ripping people off or charging sky high prices as is.  And to my knowledge from this post, what did she lie about?  Like I said, looks are subjective, he gave her a 7/9 review, cool.  I have no issue with that, she has hundreds of other reviews that attest to her quality of service.  I'm not privy to their conversation, nor do I know why she asked him not to write a review.  I just know this, TER has had a bad history of providers negotiating 10/10 reviews, just to get on the Top 100 list and start charging condo prices, I doubt that was what she's in it for.  There have been several providers that have asked clients not to write reviews, for a variety of reasons.  I see reasoning on both sides, but as far as service goes, Ivy is top notch, and the more we have ladies like her around, the better it is for clients like us to play in this game.

team_rocket_qwerty 35 Reviews 21 reads
posted
26 / 31

I thought you meant she didn't deserve the review.

Ban is up to TER I guess. Rules are rules though. I don't know, I can go fifty fifty here but I understand your reasoning.

 
Cheers

vigerous 27 Reviews 25 reads
posted
27 / 31

We don't actually know if she's 'banned,' only that she's been penalized by wiping out her reviews to date. It may be that somebody could create a profile and write a review for her and she's back in the TER review game... day one. We'll see.
 
However, I agree with your sentiment. Just losing those reviews is a big setback. And to me, it's enough of a penalty.
 
What's still stuck in my craw is, why did she use that language when, according to the monger involved, it never came up in their discussions. She was innocent until she condemned herself. SMH. She should plead her case for a total reversal and restoration.

AriaGoldberg See my TER Reviews 27 reads
posted
28 / 31

If she asked TER to remove her profile and then asked TER to put her profile back up they will
TER stores all the reviews,they never disappear

lollipopman 21 reads
posted
29 / 31

Hope you come to your senses

bdaboom 199 Reviews 26 reads
posted
30 / 31

Ratings on looks are very subjective.  I've  got  lots of reviews ant the bulk are in the 8 (really attractive) range. Most ladies think that a 7 ( attractive) is a death sentence but in reality attractive and really hot is where most fall. I think I've given out 1 (10) over the years.

36363jensen 4 Reviews 24 reads
posted
31 / 31

I've always thought the I grade against the providers I've seen approach is flawed. We don't see the same providers so averages of the samples won't match up all that well generally. If someone makes the base population for setting an average women in general then I think we get a better common metric.  

 
Same goes for the sex but that will generally not produce as much of a "commonly shared" base population for the grading as we all see a lot more women than we have sex with.

Register Now!