http://www.eros-dc.com/files/149119.htm
http://www.eros-dc.com/files/149321.htm
Any comments db911?

I'm too excited for the best weekend of football all season to sleep.  Please benefit from my insomnia.

Always check for photo credits on Eros ads.  So many of the pics that db911 is confident are stolen come from modeling sites like Met-Art.

Note that Mariah's four pics are from two different sites.  The last two are from lustphotography.com.  If you go to that site, you'll see that they definitely cater to providers, with links to Cityvibe & Eros on their main page and links to providers' sites on their Web Design page.  On their Pricing page you'll see that they specialize in photo shoots that only produce 4-8 retouched images at a cost that a girl can recoup in a single GFE session.

The odds are excellent the girl in those pictures is a provider.  Is she the girl you'll meet if you call that number, or is the pic stolen from another provider?  Your guess is as good as mine.

The first two pics are from covermodels.com.  That site looks like exactly the sort a girl might steal pics from, but I'm more willing than some to allow that a girl who does legit modeling might also be a provider.  That does happen sometimes, you know!  Plus, I cannot find Mariah Springs or those pics on that site, so maybe they have not been published there yet, but she is eagerly using the result of a new photoshoot she got paid to pose for in her ads.

Are those four pictures of the same girl?  The complexion looks different, as does the face, but that could the product of lighting, retouching, etc. I have a bad eye for these things.

Then again, if you google the phone number you'll see she also has a Backpage ad up, with an self-taken pic that seems to be the same girl as the Cover Models pics:  
http://washingtondc.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/_visiting_new_spanish_gfe_playmate_visiting_20/classifieds/ViewAd?oid=2939226

You'll also see that she has ads from the San Francisco Bay area.  If you google her e-mail address, you will find that she has mixed, but mostly strong, reviews on another site, and has changed her ad on that site to indicate that she is visiting DC.  Since it is a site that is far more popular than TER out there, but less popular than TER here, I think that is an excellent sign.

If you are really curious, you should post a 411 on their board. It is far less lively than ours, but I have received useful intel in the past from those gents.

Good luck and be safe!

I mean the San Francisco TER board.

Sorry for being evasive about the "other board," but we are not supposed to discuss other review sites on here and cannot link directly to them.  Google her e-mail address and you'll find it.

Wow, Earnest you really are earnest with this bit of research.  Must be an IT guy at heart. Thanks for the work.

...I'm convinced that those pics are all of the same girl, but that the Lust Photography pics have been heavily retouched, which we know is part of that photographer's inclusive service.  Make-up is an alternative explanation.

I had not noticed the tattoo on her right hip in the self-taken pic.  Note that in the Cover Models pics she is turned to hide that hip, but that her undecorated right hip is visible in the Lust Photography shots.  However, her face looks more similar between those.

If I had $$$ to gamble right now, I'd call her, but that's just my decision, and in any case I don't!

Her backpage ad has her with an "incall" location. Don't most scams work better with outcall only? Not a pro but i thought i would bring it up.

I'm sure somebody out there has a story of showing up to an incall where the girl just wanted to sit and talk, but you are right that those stories all seem to be outcalls.

However, an incall definitely still runs the risk of a B&S or just really lousy service.  There are also the horror stories of a thug waiting in the closet to rob you once you undress, or to come pounding on the door after five minutes, or whatever.