Washington DC

Just to add to the...
DupontGent 22 Reviews 584 reads
posted
1 / 4

There's a flood of new, seemingly unverifiable, providers on Eros this week. A lot with common traits in their ads, similar visiting dates, and "(no texting)" noted by their phone numbers. They all seem TGTBT and have zero history.

One that's a little different and makes me hold out hope is Carrie. Any info out there on her?
http://www.eros-dc.com/files/276473.htm

McDonald000 90 Reviews 322 reads
posted
2 / 4

Most of them said that she goes by the name of Gina, and works with different agencies in the United Kingdom. I didn't look much into it, but there was way too many sources for those pictures. Also, the phone number show no history. I'll let you make the decision.

I personally would avoid this girl, ain't no reviews, no history of ads here in the United States, and way too many pictures being spammed by the internet. BTW, those links down there said that she is European, and not Latin. She also made the claim that it is her in the pictures, that they were real and recent. Not sure about that, because I found like 10 pages of links that other people made that same claim. Anyhow, I'd say avoid.


http://vlondonescorts.co.uk/escorts/gallery/gina/

http://chiclondonescorts.co.uk/girls/gina/

http://strawberrygirls.co.uk/girls/gina/

MissMarple 304 reads
posted
3 / 4

fine detective work above.  The text in the Eros ad is taken directly from a rb ad on the west coast, typos and all! (You need to dig out the cached version to find it). That ad is associated with a phone number (408-310-5416) known to be associated with fake adds. They may be totally separate individuals, but it just shows there is no honor among thieves.

Fake pictures, stolen copy, no history...  Abandon all hope on this one, Gent, and leave this sleeping dog alone.

Cheers,

Miss Marple

Register Now!