From the article
"the fact that most American prostitution is a result of human trafficking"
Did y'all see this in the Post this week? "...ordering three prostitutes to your hotel room is as easy as ordering a pizza."
Funny how they position online porn as the gateway drug to shopping for prostitutes online.
hookup? Articled mentioned they evaded their chaperones by calling the providers at 5:00AM, since their chaperones checked on them at 1:30AM-4:30AM, LMAO.
I partially agree with that article, that modern technology does influence the younger generation to seek providers. Imagine 10 or so years ago, if a person was looking for a provider, they had to go wondering the back alleyway of the streets, look at magazine articles, or go to the bars. Now, you can make your arrangements with a mobile device.
Everything has become so convenient. Is it not true that some of us spend more time on the iphone than we do with our friends or family members? The younger generations are not like some of us, and the older generations. They were born into technology. So, it doesn't surprise me that with modern technology, it does influence the younger generation to seek out providers.
When providers post ads, "No one under 25", they literally mean that. A provider I saw a few months ago told me that she gets a lot of younger clients, ranging from 18-21. She told me she rejected some of them because they physically looked too young.
As it relates to your thread, sure, it can be easy as ordering pizza, but it varies. The guys in the news article more than likely called a BP provider that solicited herself at 5:00AM.
-- Modified on 9/14/2012 4:47:26 PM
We went to the no one under 30 rule about 5 years ago when we saw the trend. Part of the problem was those under 25 then 30 saw our services as a right not a privilege. When we went to 30 and older the number of incidents dropped like 95%. When I say incidences, I mean minor un-pleasantries of poor manners, education and up-bring sort of behavior drivers.
At this point, the biggest problem we're having is finding young women who are NOT completely lazy, morons or total gold diggers looking for some emotionally weak client to manipulate for a life time free ride. They want everything handed to them and heaven help you if you require them to work for something.
Yes I know, I'm doing that " these damn kids today" rant.
Oh and who ever is ordering Pizza, I'll take a Uno with extra Mushrooms from PIzzeria Uno please.
Sincerely,
Lee Dreams
" It's all about integrity"
I partially agree with that article, that modern technology does influence the younger generation to seek providers. Imagine 10 or so years ago, if a person was looking for a provider, they had to go wondering the back alleyway of the streets, look at magazine articles, or go to the bars. Now, you can make your arrangements with a mobile device.
Everything has become so convenient. Is it not true that some of us spend more time on the iphone than we do with our friends or family members? The younger generations are not like some of us, and the older generations. They were born into technology. So, it doesn't surprise me that with modern technology, it does influence the younger generation to seek out providers.
When providers post ads, "No one under 25", they literally mean that. A provider I saw a few months ago told me that she gets a lot of younger clients, ranging from 18-21. She told me she rejected some of them because they physically looked too young.
As it relates to your thread, sure, it can be easy as ordering pizza, but it varies. The guys in the news article more than likely called a BP provider that solicited herself at 5:00AM.
-- Modified on 9/14/2012 4:47:26 PM
Loaded with cream, not good for the teeth, cheap but sweet and decadent![]()
At this point, the biggest problem we're having is finding young women who are NOT completely lazy, morons or total gold diggers looking for some emotionally weak client to manipulate for a life time free ride. They want everything handed to them and heaven help you if you require them to work for something.
Yes I know, I'm doing that " these damn kids today" rant.
Oh and who ever is ordering Pizza, I'll take a Uno with extra Mushrooms from PIzzeria Uno please.
Sincerely,
Lee Dreams
" It's all about integrity"
I partially agree with that article, that modern technology does influence the younger generation to seek providers. Imagine 10 or so years ago, if a person was looking for a provider, they had to go wondering the back alleyway of the streets, look at magazine articles, or go to the bars. Now, you can make your arrangements with a mobile device.
Everything has become so convenient. Is it not true that some of us spend more time on the iphone than we do with our friends or family members? The younger generations are not like some of us, and the older generations. They were born into technology. So, it doesn't surprise me that with modern technology, it does influence the younger generation to seek out providers.
When providers post ads, "No one under 25", they literally mean that. A provider I saw a few months ago told me that she gets a lot of younger clients, ranging from 18-21. She told me she rejected some of them because they physically looked too young.
As it relates to your thread, sure, it can be easy as ordering pizza, but it varies. The guys in the news article more than likely called a BP provider that solicited herself at 5:00AM.
-- Modified on 9/14/2012 4:47:26 PM
This is the generations we are raising now. Go to a high school football game sometime. The players have tatts, wild dread locks, trash talking constantly. This is just the next step. If I had looked or behaved like that when I played high school ball, my coach would have personally kicked my ass and my Dad probably would have helped him!
But I agree, it is very odd they were able to pull this off with no references and being out of town at such a late hour. I guess they found hookers in Durham that are desperate.
From the article
"the fact that most American prostitution is a result of human trafficking"
Where the NFL recruiters pay for your escorts.
The whole thing seems very odd. Something doesn't seem to add up here.
They were in Durham NC, which is not exactly the Strip in Las Vegas. They were underage, presumably had no local contacts or references, no verifiable screening information apart from items that would have raised red flags (underage drivers license, high school ID). In spite of this, how is it that they somehow got hookers to show up at 5:00 am? Are there really working girls in Durham so desperate for business that they are available at such ridiculous hours for unknown clients? I have no clue what the statutory rape laws are in NC, but they could have been exposing themselves to more than just prostitution charges. Apparently, these escorts weren't policewomen because the story report that actual sex took place. Policewomen I could believe because the outrageous nature of the scenario would be the sort of thing that might attract police attention or might even be tipped off by the escort service if they had some tacit relationship with the local cops.
Moreover, it seems odd that they could have been working to evade bed check by the chaperones at 1:30 and 4:30. Multiple checks in the middle of the night seem implausible too. If the players are supposed to be rested, why do they go in and possibly wake them twice in the very small hours? If they feel the need for 1:30 and 4:30 am bed checks, how chronic are serious behavior problems among these "student" athletes?
if they got anyone to come over it was a rip off that at best would take their money and show a little tit then leave.