Approved.  Did anyone else see her while she was in DC??? Anyone?

Read these two reviews as well:

http://theeroticreview.com/reviews/ShowReview.asp?Review=258682&user=291600

http://theeroticreview.com/reviews/ShowReview.asp?Review=238933&user=291600

-- Modified on 12/9/2004 8:01:59 PM

That sucks.   Hopefully Kim will make some accomodation for you, which I do not think is likely.  Her reviews will precede her and gents will have you and the other two gents to thanks for their candor.

Her reviews for the past couple of months have not been good. $$$1/2. agree is way to high..performance has been low.. Thanks for the honesty..

I've got one better than that guys. I saw Mari Lynn from BDJ while she was in Baltimore and when she opened the door I almost turned around . The pictures of her are at least 10-15 years old. She is definitly false advertising. Big stomach scar and old looking.

 Iceblu

It never ceases to amaze me, you read these reviews and guys say this wasn't good, that wasn't good, I wouldn't see her again and then give the provider an 8?

That doesn't help us out one bit.  I'm gonna pay less attention to the number and actually READ ALL the reviews very carfully.

Guys -I saw Bridgette a couple of years ago when she first came to DC. Had an awesome time with her -and thought, as the others did, that the woman was a stunning woman, with incredible breasts.
Have not had a chance to see her recently, but would definitely return again -if we are ever in the same city at the same time (can't seem to make that happen these days).
Rick2

Sure JT, that's how TER sells VIP memberships.  If the numbers really MEANT anything, a fair chunk of current members probably wouldn't BE.  BTW, it works the other way around too, when TER can lower scores without giving any explanation, and the reviewer has NO recourse.  The reviewer can't even request that the review be pulled (to the best of my knowledge only a provider can request that all of their OWN reviews be pulled). I had one review lowered two points!  What is intuitively the difference between a 7 and a 9 to you?  Quite a BIT, to me.  Net result?  It ends up offending someone you NEVER meant to.  People think the reviewer gave that score, when perhaps they did not.

Ponzone and JT - agree 100%. Sometimes just shake my head at some of the ratings. How about the guy that is a victim of bait and switch, decides to stay even though the girl is not that hot, has to pay extra for what he thought he was getting with the original donation, the girl does not kiss or give a bj and he then gives her a 7 or 8 for performance. Then there is the guy who is with a hot girl that does the whole alphabet, goes over the hour and basically rocks his word. Her performance rating is knocked from a 9 to an 8, for reasons unknown. If you do not read the review you can waste a lot of money on that first lady.

Was recently checking reviews on a certain lady. Mostly mediocre, but with one 10 10. Checked that guys other reviews, he had 8 and all were 9's and 10's (with 6 10's in each category). Some of the ladies he was giving 10's to could have made the cut for The Swan series, not really the help we need.

What confounds me is why TER changes scores in the first place.. Maybe the lady had an exceptional day, or the guy she was seeing was totally thrilled with her and felt she deemed a high score.  How does it become TER's job to edit something they know nothing about?  They weren't in the room, they don't know if she had a really good hair day and looked 10 smokin or just really clicked with a guy and gave an exceptional experience..

TER people sit in an office somewhere, reading reviews all day and somehow arbitrarily decide a score is too high or low, based on past performance??  How is that fair?? Maybe she's not normally a CIM girl, but on that particular day, she liked the guy a lot and did it anyway.  I've had girls do things they claim they won't do, because we just clicked..

There is this sense of domination TER puts us all through when they change things without any real reason to do so.  It's not any difference than having to fill out an entire form that keeps the original answers, regardless if you write something else.. If she does CIM for me, but the original poster said NO in that question, it remains no forever, even if she aquired a 'taste' for it and started doing it regularly..  Our current answers are ignored.. Another of the issues with how TER creates reviews that are inaccurate.  

And as Ponzie said, if the lady in question sees her low score, she may feel hurt if the guy said he had a great time and intended to give her a high score then she reads it and it's a 5-6..

I'd suggest many things to do it better, but TER has routinely ignored my emails, and apparently doesn't ever answer anyone's mail, and they continue to do things the way they feel like it..

I'd suggest a 'chart graph' instead of one blanket answer.. If 10 guys see someone, and she allowed CIM 5 times.. the graph could look like this:

Scores Oldest to newest:
         111    
         210987654321
CIM?   NNNNNYYYNNYY

instead of a blanket Yes.. The graph could be for the previous 10-20 reviews then the oldest drop off.. This would show that while she didn't do it before, she's more apt to do it now. It could also be dots Green for yes, Red for no.. etc etc..

Same with other issues and scores in the reviews.. But ultimately, TER really has no right to change the scores or reviews as unless they're actually the participant, they have no way to know how the reviewer felt..  In the case of ripoffs, and she gets a 10, then clearly it's a shill review and it's simply not accepted at all..

I keep saying I'd like to do a site similar to TER for local people, with truly certified photos and the more I read, the more i wonder if it's worth doing it better than what's currently out there..

--JB

-- Modified on 12/11/2004 7:52:18 AM

First, appearance is such a subjective quality (the old "eye of the beholder" principal). What I, as an older guy, might find "endearing" in a lady's body might put off a young guy. (Hey, I grew up in an age when women had hair there, and didn't have "feminine hygiene" products.)

Performance is also subjective, to a point. I don't care about Greek, so it's not points for or against in my book. As for the sacrocanct BBBJCIM, one of the most intense experiences I've had in the recent past (my eyes rolled back in my head, my knees almost buckled) involved CBJ.

I, like others, also don't understand how a reviewer who apparently has all his desires met ends up giving a rating of 6.

 Lleb

I have to agree with Jeop on this. Perhaps people can stop complaining about the changes in the review numbers, which don't mean anything anyway. Instead, focus on providing useful information within the details of the reviews.

As we all will agree, a 7 to one person is a 4 to someone else and a 10 to someone else. So if she is awesome in bed, tell us why. If you feel like leaving when you get to the door, tell us that, and also tell us why you ended up staying and then feeling scammed.
Details are where the value of the reviews are -not the numbers.

Jeop makes another important suggestion, that I often use as well. Look at the credibility of the reviewer's other postings. For example, some guy on this board was complaining about a provider recently and how he only got one pop when she usually provides multiples. Nothing personal meant here, just an example. So you look at his other reviews, and he rarely gives adequate as a grade for performance. To me, he has less credibility because he's never satisfied -at least in his writings. Read the other reviews the guy has posted and if you've seen that provider, compare your experience with his. Then you can really assess if someone shares your tastes and their reviews get enhanced credibility.

Rick2

JB, I have addressed this subject numerous times on this board.  However, not everyone gets to see them because a page can scroll off very quickly and many just won't go back even one page in their reading and responding (muchless two or three).  Previously however, I have suggested that once TER changes a review, it effectively has become THEIRS.  However, there is NO mechanism to show that or to display that the review was changed.  Also, what you mentioned about the top portions of the review have been covered numerous times, as well.  Nonetheless, you are RIGHT.  Why must we keep filling it out, if nothing up there ever CHANGES?  And, how misleading can that be, when things DO change in actuality?

rick, I agree numbers have limitations and are subjective.  In fact, MUCH of what we see here is subjective.  My only point is, if numbers are so worthless (which largely I think they might be) then why does TER require them and then CHANGE them from the ones the reviewer gave?

jeopie..

While I think you're the King Of All Studs on here, I must disagree with you..

TER REQUIREs us to post a rating, and since they're not us, they're not IN the room, they don't even KNOW the lady in question, their ARBITRARY decision to lower or raise ratings to keep them in some alignment with other reviews is simply and purely wrong.

If YOU see someone and she knocks your socks off, well damn, you certainly would be an excellent arbiter of what is incredible with your unmatched resume.  What would give TER the right to change your rating if for some bizarre logic they simply change it?  There is none..  If your reiew of someone who'd been getting 5/6's and you found her to be a 10/10, then what gives TER the right to change it? These reviews belong to the reviewer, not TER.  IF TER wants to change it, then it should post the reviewers rating and their 'ADJUSTED' rating, perhaps even with a disclaimer about WHY it was adjusted.

If Ponzie sees someone with his 15? (not positive) number of reviews, while he has less than you, what would make his review any less credible?  IF TER thinks a review is out of secret range they set, it should be discarded and not used at all, but to change it to suit some unknown methodology is simply wrong. I don't think there is any justification for this policy.

IF I See someone, and she totally rocks my world and is beautiful beyond belief, remember, this IS, afterall, MY REVIEW and MY OPINION, and others rated her lower for whatever their same reasons were, and I give her a 10/10, it's how I FEEL about her.. For TER to decide to make my review an 8/8 for example is wrong.  I rated her based on my opinions, and if others disagree, they'll post their own opinions in their own review.. Remember, these reviews ARE only opinions..

Lets try another approach.. Lila for example has 30 pages of reviews, and mostly gets 8s,9s and 10s.. With SO many reviews, if someone gives her a 10/10, would TER change it?  Probably not.. BUT... What if a reviewer gives her a 4/4?.. maybe she wasn't pretty in HIS EYES and HIS OPINION.. Maybe he didn't like the way she fucked him.. Would it be right to change HIS opinion, without him having any recourse to a 9/9?

The opposite of all this is then the NEW provider.. What does TER do if a new lady gets a 5/5 then a 9/9? There is one, I think Mari Ann maybe?  Two polar opposite opinions and those are the only reviews.. How does that make sense? Yet, TER appears to have left them alone.

We can't affect the entire top of the review, as whatever is posted in the first review is written in stone, yet TER makes us fill all that crap out, even though it's ignored.  Then TER changes the opinion/review of someone they don't know on a provider they don't know for reasons that no one knows.

It's wrong.. And while we doubt TER reads any of our posts, it would be nice if they left them alone..

--JB



-- Modified on 12/13/2004 12:22:39 AM

JB, I very much enjoyed the thoroughness of your post and your exploration of the different "permutations" and examples.  However, I don't think jeep was disagreeing with us.  Rather, I think he was just explaining the "economic reality" of it all.  I think he's just as exasperated as the REST of us.  Every day and every way, we see how religion, politics, and economics seem to keep this world from being the "place it ought to be".

Where the HELL would I go, jeep?  With that ugly MUT?  NEVER!  I like that idea of setting up a local review board.  Only problem is, I'm no "techno-junkie".  I wouldn't have the first CLUE how to set up a website, not to mention the capital.

 The other thing is, as owner of the site, I wouldn't be able to REVIEW.  Oh PERISH the THOUGHT!!

-- Modified on 12/13/2004 10:43:30 AM