Hi Megan,
POV means "personally owned vehicle" to me baby, but lets assume for the moment that you don't want to talk cars.
I have from day one appreciated the opportunity to write the General Detais section, and despised having to write the Juicy Details.
I would imagine regulars have heard it too often from me now, but I am in this for intimate experiences. I still have sex in the 3rd decade of my marriage, it is the intimacy that left a number of years ago and led me here. Took me a little while to figure that out, but here we are.
The General Details section allows to me communicate to others, and others to me, the type of PERSON you will be if I select you for a date. Almost all of you beautiful women have provided me with the most mind-blowing sex of my life, from how beautiful you are to your.....proclivity to please....to how seriously you take your physical presence. I can simply perform a search on Washington DC and a certain score range and know the sex will be great, but it takes a bit more work and research to find a great LOVER. Someone who is going to appreciate gently holding and being held as much as I, and understand how much I get off on just pampering them and again....making them my lover for that time together, not my provider. Those providers are actually quite a bit more rare than you might (or might not....) think.
Of my last four providers, who have become my four regular providers not coincidentally, I have only read ANY of the juicy details section for one, and that was at her insistence because her menu is not as open as other providers in her price range. She wanted to make certain we were on the same page and that made a lot sense. All she has done is provide me with the most wonderful intimacy that I have experienced in my nearly 50 years, so really.....I could have skipped the details and been just fine.
I deplore writing the details, it is a Lady McBeth syndrom effect afterwards as I "just can't get clean" for a while afterwards. I had my first overnight with a provider last weekend and I would guess 70% of what went down is NOT in the review, but there is still plenty of detail there to result in the score she deserved, and give other guys what they need to know. There is a young lady I am looking at for next week and have had some back channel communication with someone who has seen her who asked me yesterday if I had seen her most recent review, which is beyond pretty graphic. I made the mistake and now....I don't know Megan. It is just fucking unnecessary to write that kind of shit about a women and it pissed me off when I read it last night. Maybe she wants that.
My procedure going into the details section is always the same: What score am I giving her, and how much do I need to disclose to bring her up to that score? From there it is the painstaking process of finding the verbiage that communicates the experience in the most respectful possible terms.
I "only" have 13 reviews written Megan, but I have reviewed all but three women I have seen since I found TER and I am probably at 60 or 70 dates now including 20+ with my primary ATF. I hobby in a 2nd area as well which is not as economically advantaged as DC, and all three were from that area and were just horrendous experiences (that is another thread) and were not on TER and there was not enough info known about them (such as name in ad) to review them. My point is that the number is only thirteen primarily because I have found the intimacy that I had sought from this wonderful hobby and I hope that I have been successful in communicating that about these providers in the General Details.
I get a lot of bcak-channel communication here and, as I am certain you know, there are far, FAR more men in this hobby for emotional (intimacy) needs than sexual needs, but a relative few are willing to actually put that out there. To wit, other hobbyists, on average, are getting more required info from my General Details specifics than the Details and that would be true even if I was writing everything that happened in the Details section, So I know I have this right