Washington DC

Here is my math calculation....
Rate-A-Date 3176 reads
posted
1 / 25

Robin is the newest DC Club 200 Member and she comes in on top in three categories.

She has the highest Overall Average Rating in DC Club 200, is tied for highest Average Looks Rating in DC Club 200, and holds the coveted highest Average Performance Rating in DC Club 200.

Not only is she the highest Average Performance Rating in DC Club 200, she holds that title by an average margin of more than 6/10 of a point over the next highest lady!


Full DC Club 200 Numbers

Lila – http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=19900
595 Reviews since February 2002 - the most reviewed woman in DC
3.19 Average Days per Review, the fastest pace in DC Club 200
7.92 Average Overall Rating 4th highest in DC CLUB 200
8.47 Average Performance Rating 2nd highest in DC CLUB 200
7.37 Average Looks Rating 5th highest in DC CLUB 200

Samantha – http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=6146
323 Reviews since July 2001 - the 2nd most reviewed woman in DC
6.54 Average Days per Review, the 3rd fastest pace in DC CLUB 200
8.07 Average Overall Rating 2nd highest in DC CLUB 200
8.17 Average Performance Rating 5th highest in DC CLUB 200
7.98 Average Looks Rating tied for highest in DC CLUB 200

Nikki French – http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=3713
245 Reviews since February 2001 - the 3rd most reviewed woman in DC
9.23 Average Days per Review, the 5th fastest pace in DC CLUB 200
7.80 Average Overall Rating 5th highest in DC CLUB 200
8.18 Average Performance Rating 4th highest in DC CLUB 200
7.42 Average Looks Rating 4th highest in DC CLUB 200

Simone – http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=25537
244 Reviews since April 2003 - the 4th most reviewed woman in DC
6.04 Average Days per Review, the 2nd fastest pace in DC CLUB 200
7.97 Average Overall Rating 2nd highest in DC CLUB 200
8.44 Average Performance Rating 3rd highest in DC CLUB 200
7.51 Average Looks Rating 3rd highest in DC CLUB 200

Robin – http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=26474
200 Reviews since May 2003 - the 5th most reviewed woman in DC
7.22 Average Days per Review, the 5th fastest pace in DC CLUB 200
8.53 Average Overall Rating the highest in DC CLUB 200
9.08 Average Performance Rating the highest in DC CLUB 200
7.98 Average Looks Rating tied for highest in DC CLUB 200

CoolMario 1948 reads
posted
2 / 25

well i like the fact that the ladies know how to please their men.. but then i started to think and put some numbers behind it..

lets assume that for each 1 person who posts a review .. there are probably 5 to 6 guys who meet these ladies who do not post.. (I heard some places that the number is as high as 10 to 15).. but lets go with a 5 ..

so in the case of Lila we are looking at
595 published reviews, which means 2975 unpublished encounters (If you use the 5 multiplier) ..... now lets say that those "encounters" were for the past 3 years.. that means approx 1000 encounters per year....which means for 365 days a year, she has had 2.7 encounters per day!.. (lets say 3)

now after all of this math.. my question is .. how tight is that ..... maybe a way to look at these reviews is to go and see the ladies who have less reviews..?

now have in mind that with a 10 multiplier, you will be looking at approx 6 encounters per day "every day" of year.. i can see it now on top of her incall

"now serving ......" digital sign.

again no disrespect to the ladies with tons of reviews.. but a different look at the numbers..

now i kind of know why JeopCon1 goes for the new ladies in town..... i need to adjust my strategy a bit.. ;-)

-- Modified on 4/13/2007 4:20:51 AM

-- Modified on 4/13/2007 4:22:08 AM

-- Modified on 4/13/2007 4:27:06 AM

lovu 3411 reads
posted
3 / 25

coolmario...I hate to brust your balloon but girls with or without reviews see more than 5 a day some up to 10 if they are traveling.  Do you think they are in it for their.....

DreamMaker100 43 Reviews 3634 reads
posted
4 / 25

I would bet that most of us have run the numbers of this sort at one time or another and cringed.We all take different approaches. Some just don't think about it. Some like new providers, some go with low volume ladies. Some like to be the first appt of the day. It would be interesting to hear what others have to say.

Snownfire 25 Reviews 1892 reads
posted
5 / 25

the lady will show me a good time.  Lots of reviews could mean she has something that men like and might be worth a look see.  

And, I find it interesting that for a man high numbers is a badge of honor, but yet for a lady you are suggesting that it isn't.

Wow, talk about a double standard!

LegalEagle1994 78 Reviews 3087 reads
posted
6 / 25

Absolutely brilliant stuff...

One question, do you have a job?  This stuff has to take a bunch of time...  

please keep doing this, it is really cool... BTW, I hate math!

dottheI 499 Reviews 1943 reads
posted
7 / 25



-- Modified on 4/13/2007 6:39:02 AM

LegalEagle1994 78 Reviews 2065 reads
posted
8 / 25

take the total times the size of the framulator, divide by the numerational and add 3, subtract the totla of their combined breast size.  I get 73/3C to the nth power.

Told you I love math!

WildTurkey-101 141 Reviews 1766 reads
posted
10 / 25

Numbers are highly subjective, you can speculate all day long, which is why I put very little importance on them. Your estimations of rviews vs. guys actually seen is probably close, but that highly varies from one provider to another. Many providers frown on reviews while others will actually offer discounts and press you to write a review. Some ladies have alot of regulars and see very few new customers while others see new customers constantly, the variables go on and on.
 
Personally, if I was to see one of these ladies, I could care less what their reviews from several years ago reflected, providers level of service and appearance changes over time - for the better or worse. I would only be interested in the past several months, a year at most.

One_Shot 4 Reviews 1842 reads
posted
11 / 25

I try not to think of the possibility of the other "visitors" of the day.  I also try to book longer appointments (at least 3 hours) with ladies in hopes that I may be the only appointment of the day.  I also try to see ladies that have more limited schedules.

-- Modified on 4/13/2007 6:59:52 AM

chilehead 59 Reviews 3713 reads
posted
12 / 25

I get no information from these numbers other than how long a lady has been reviewed on TER and how many reviews there are.  Averages mean nothing.  What about someone who progressed at their craft from a 7 in the way past to a 9 today?  If you must have numbers then I would prefer to see medians, not averages (means), by year or by quarter of a year. (A graph would be much better).
Also it is important to remember that TER is not the only place where one may find reviews.  And, there are many wonderful providers who either have no reviews on TER (perhaps elsewhere) or discourage reviews for privacy sake (which I respect and hope you do too).

Finally, Few reviewers actually use the 1-10 scale according to the published definitions.  Instead, the numbers are a subjective mark of enthusiasm of the reviewer.  That's fine - I like to see lots of enthusiastic reviews - but as always, YMMV.

To simplify things, I suggest computing only median scores for the past 3 months.  That would be the most informative.

VSOP 44 Reviews 2725 reads
posted
13 / 25

I think he should do a Rate-A-John on Jeopcon!  That would be amusing!

balto 27 Reviews 3476 reads
posted
14 / 25

I think one reason for the high numbers is that these girls have been at it a long time with their current moniker. Some ladies reinvent themselves for whatever reasons and lose months or years worth of reviews.  So there may be other ladies that should be on the list.

Also, you used Lila's numbers and divided by 3 years, but she has reviews for the past 5 years. It changes your numbers from 2.7 down to 1.6 encounters per day.

We could play with these numbers all day, dontcha just love math!

And at $300/session she's made nearly $900,000 in just 5 years! That's a lot of candy!

Watch-A-Crotch 2010 reads
posted
15 / 25

Please search for my past posts.

Nikki French See my TER Reviews 1835 reads
posted
16 / 25

When you wrote 5 reviews in February, how many more reviews stayed unwritten? How many times before these 5 times did you snuggle with someone? You MEAN it? Wow! Are you Cool Mario or Superman? LOL!

Don't try to make numbers talk to you. Remember it's supposed to be for fun, and I don't see any fun in computerizing us! Because whatever the answer is going to be, it will always be wrong.

My two cents! Instead have fun, and stay safe.

XOXO

Nikki

WildTurkey-101 141 Reviews 1424 reads
posted
17 / 25

I think your response reflects how many providers feel. I must say I totally agree with you also.

Anna bella See my TER Reviews 1426 reads
posted
18 / 25

Beides sexy ... you're so darn smart too.  

Great day beautiful lady.

oxox,

Annabella

Ponzone 39 Reviews 1525 reads
posted
19 / 25

That's odd.  I didn't detect anything the least bit mechanical about you.  Electrical maybe. lol  Certainly not mechanical.  Was someone suggesting that you were an android?  No, somehow you didn't come across as being "Data" on STTNG either.  Besides, androids are cold and you were anything else BUT.

I found you to be a warm, comfy, and delightfully charming human being (with a few animal cravings thrown in for the gusto--lol).  I also found you to be a very nice down-to-earth and interesting lady.  

Considering all of this, no wonder you feel dehumanized by these types of analyses.

Bloom616 76 Reviews 1579 reads
posted
20 / 25

Well said Nikki - I have met with most of the ladies on this list more than once and I will see them again - because I know I'll have a great time.   Now Nikki - we haven't been properly introduced but you will hear from me soon.

Nikki_Irish See my TER Reviews 1908 reads
posted
21 / 25
Rate-A-Date 1747 reads
posted
22 / 25

JeopCon1 by the Numbers…Again

407 Reviews since April 2002
4.52 Average Days Per Review

7.55 Average Overall Rating
7.56 Average Looks Rating
7.55 Average Performance Rating

blueeyeddoc 95 Reviews 2194 reads
posted
23 / 25

OK!
I'm a surgeon, not a statistician, but one of the reasons (in my opinion) as to why Robin is 'so reviewed' is because of the waiting line to see her.  The first time one see her(did some of us, including me, wait for a couple of years?), and she truly lives up to her 'highest looks and performance' scores...most of us feel it is almost 'obligatory' to review her.  I would speculate that IF you get to see Robin, you will review her.
Simple.
It would be impossible to validate that, as no one knows the numerator, and only Robin know the denominator, but...
She is every thing the rate-a-date stats indicate.

AnaisDC 2342 reads
posted
24 / 25

I can't speak for every provider but I think you are way off base. I never saw 5 gentlemen a day traveling or not. I know quite a few well known providers who do not either. Are you omnipotent? Exactly, I didn't think so.

AnaisDC 3802 reads
posted
25 / 25

I could not have said it better! You have always been a sage woman.

Hope you are doing well!

xo,
Anais

Register Now!