http://www.eros-dc.com/files/173833.htm

http://san-francisco-escorts.cityvibe.com/escorts/list/214321.htm

http://classic.theeroticreview.com/reviews/showReview.asp?Review=953698

quotes from the reviews:

"...expecting to see a really pretty young fresh girl, I was greeted with a hard looking girl who only slightly represents the girl in the pics on her website."

"I would stay away from Treat unless you want to be disappointed."

"...definite let down from seeing her pictures."

This girl has about 12 good reviews(mostly 8s) and 2 bad reviews under a 6!
You are malicious and annoying. Post a link to her reviews and notify a name change, fine but copy & pasting her worst comments is just plain BS. Let guys pay VIP, read her reviews and base their own opinion instead of ruining her rep from 2 stinking reviews
I have all 9/10s but I also have 2 bad reviews and if you posted comments from those reviews every one would think I sucked...and not in a good way!

What exactly is your motive for bashing this girl anyway, she isnt skinny enough for you? Lol

On another note, Its against the rules for provides to copy&paste any portion of reviews including profile info so why can a hobbyist copy&paste info that VIP member pay for?

Going overboard as usual yes. Reminds me of my annoying neighbor who thinks i have 3 girls living with me and all they do is come visit me all the time.

Thanks for the information.

Is TER paying you to review the reviews?

already see and determine for ourselves.

I think the "ladies" posting on this thread should worry about THEIR OWN reviews.  

Here's the "about us" link. Check it out.

http://classic.theeroticreview.com/info_policies/aboutUs.asp

This has been a bone of contention from providers that I have talked to.  Someone who has not seen or reviewed a lady is free to make accusations or telling hobbyists what to do.  That is so not cool.  But then freedom of posting is a TER privilege (or is that a right?!).

Per TER policy, publishing any portion of copyrighted material in whole or in part is grounds for being banned from the site. Posts on the general board have been removed for doing exactly what Db just did, and providers have been banned for publishing portions in ads or on their websites.

So basically, enforcement of TER policies is dependent on the firmness of a given moderators spinal column.

Can we now copy and paste VIP portion of reviews?

I would love to include not just portions, but entire reviews on my site and in my ads.

As TER Master of all things that do not concern you, would you care to dispense the judgment?

Lina

No one said it wasnt here for men, sooooo whats your point?
Thats a wack diversion from the topic at hand which is

1. You are dead wrong about this girl
2. You violated TER rules
3. You have no personal experience with this girl
4. You just cant admit when you are wrong

Tons of very well reviewed girls change their name, its not a sign of a bad provider. Also tons of well reviewed girls have a bad review or 2

I can't imagine what db11s motivation for this post was. It is inappropriate and should be pulled down by the moderator and db11 should be moderated. The provider who he cites has over a page of very good reviews, including some very high scores for appearance and performance. Why would he go after someone who I assume he has never met? This was a very flakey thing to do.

I may require therapy.

Won't someone call me a Waaaaaambulance?

Mere words are not stopping anyone from taking their chances and visiting this woman.  

Quite ridiculous that anyone thinks I have some sort of control over anyone else in that I can keep someone from reading and making their own decisions.

Did any of you white knights go see her?

Thanks for all your calls for censorship - Lenin and Marx would be proud of you.

nothing in either of those quotes deviated to any degree from the info in the general details sections - and no rating numbers were given.

As for the overall effect of the post, I'll wager she got more traffic to her ads, and to her good reviews, than she has seen for some time.

Let's all chill out.

I don't db911 is entitled to speak his mind and the threaded should be pulled. Voice your opinion if you disagree. This is working the way a message should.

A few years ago I made some posts similar to this one and the moderator of this board at that time removed them, giving me this advice.  He called it "ladybashing," as I had no experience with the ladies in question and was just broadcasting what any other VIP could find if they researched the lady.

Obviously, Puck has a different attitude on this subject from that mod, which is fine.  The fact remains that such posts are rude and serve no real purpose.  I've learned that, just as I've learned that you don't really care whether or not you are rude and that you somehow think that the first amendment has anything to do with the activities of private institutions and that Marx's normative critique of capitalism as anything to do with censorship.

her reviews under Treat look good except just one bad one, if I was a hobbyists unless they were overwhelmingly bad um her name-changing wouldn't scare me. I'm tempted to change mine.

I agree that DB's post is selective in what quotes he's picking out from her reviews.  That said, caveat emptor.  If you're so lazy that you take his word for it without performing your own research, then you could be missing out on an opportunity that you'd really enjoy.  Even if you're non-VIP, and limited to just the General Details text, you'd find both positive and negative experiences listed.  (Btw, if you're non-VIP, why even bother using TER?)
As always, do your own background checking and the truth about a girl (good or bad) will come out.