So why all the fuss about this particular "alias" individual?  Am I missing something?

such a thing and you did the exact same thing?  Give Beefeater credit when he has something to say he uses NO alias.  (This statement is based on observation not fact)

Great job, Beef.  What's the over/under on how long it will take you to expose the medical man on his new alias-of-hate now that he has been exposed on his first one?

Someone just posted the other day how much they missed his 'prosaic and elucid, almost romantic poetry'. Guess this will make their day, LOL.

I know he aggitated at times yet other times he was pretty straight. Guess maybe a true Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde scenario.
Care to explain Mr. JustDFacts?? Got the balls too??

I'm really glad that Beefeater pointed out the Top 10 posters this morning.

As I wrote to him, I've corresponded with the owner of the alias on several occasions and found him to be polite and a sweet gentleman.
The mean-spiritedness and bold vendetta that he has pushed through the alias scares a provider like me away.  Heavy participation is one thing, the ability to turn hot and cold or target the subject of your ire with speculation, accusations, assumptions and overall drama is just plain crazy.

I think that members shouldn't necessarily be on their best behavior BUT should recognize that providers do note the behaviors of clients.
If you've got some "tendencies" you let show through online games and you get caught, it just may limit your options with providers who have ZERO interest in potentially vindictive, obsessive, self-indulgent clients.

This is supposed to be fun - stick to "the facts and nothing but the facts" and leave all of that other garbage at home lest you royally embarrass yourself.