For humor, sarcasm and some insight for both newbies and novices. Watch the linked clip first, it’ll get you in the right head space for this.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9p3j294sqM8
Too many newbies and even novices are setting up sessions thinking with only the little head. Maybe we need to “clean the pipes - get the baby batter off the brain - that stuff will fuck your head up” then do the math and make choices with the big head.
While in Miami on work/vacation/whatever, hotties everywhere, I notice utter failure on the very 1st page of TER reviews, WTF guys? You got baby batter on the brain, BBOTB! I look at these like case files I’m working on, trying to understand why?
I noticed Alison Hernandez TER ID: 397380. 8 reviews in a year, avg performance = 3.875, before the most recent review = 4.14 avg. This choice was made due to BBOTB period! On performance alone she had 4 out of 7 reviews that were a 3 or less. Looking a bit deeper, 5 of the 7 reviews were by people with numerous reviews, only 2 of them with 3 or less. What boggles my mind the most is the most recent reviewer who gave her a 2 had 8 previous reviews with trans already. Looking deeper you find of the now 9 reviews of TS, 5 of them are a score of 3 or less.
I noticed Sarah Mejia TER ID: 383128. 4 reviews in 2 years, performance avg = 2.25, before the most recent = 2.3 avg. This is a more complex case, she’s more appealing (to me) she’s got a nice cock pic, she’s in the hot Latina MILF category, my kryptonite! Before the latest review her performances were; 1, 5 and 1, that should have said enough. But he had BBOTB, saw her, and gave her a 2. Looking deeper 2 of the reviewers had numerous reviews, only 1 of them had only 1 review. The latest reviewer is relatively new, please don’t go out with a loaded gun anymore, BBOTB, that stuff will fuck your head up!
Here’s where it gets interesting, to me anyway. One of the 2 Sarah reviewers with multiples, had only reviewed trans 3 times out of 28 total. They were the latest 3 reviews and all a 1 for performance. Compared to the 25 genetic reviews with an even mix of 5s, at the lowest, 6s and 7s at the highest. Is that a result of BBOTB? The other one had around 80 reviews total, 2-3 genetic girls the rest trans, but the highest performance score was only a 7 and about 32 were 2s and 3s. Again is this BBOTB?
I’m all for exploring kinks, desires and fantasies etc., however, after a while when do you realize it may not be your thing? I’ve mentioned this before, that some seem to score trans lower but keep trying them while complaining or they score genetic girls with a higher average than trans. In these 2 examples the most complex thing to determine is if Sarah is really that bad of a provider or she’s been with inconsistent clients or those who have personal biases.
Guys if you take away one thing, it’s how much BBOTB fucks with our head! When setting up sessions, clean the pipes & do the math! Reduce choices to simple math as much as possible. As always, be careful out there and have fun and write a review!
