Transsexual

That's correct but
shortstem 1 Reviews 742 reads
posted
1 / 9

its about time to treat everyone equal,

Mario.Lopez 507 reads
posted
2 / 9

As it stands, everyone can serve. Before DADT, the recruiters would ask, "Are you a homosexual?"
My question is....Are we going back to that?
Also, if we let gays/lesbians serve openly......Would we (tax payers) have to give benefits (health care, shopping) to their lovers? Then what about heterosexuals with live-in boyfriends/girlfriends?
I spent 20 years in the Army....I didn't enjoy a stiff cock until I retired.
I believe the system is where it needs to be......That's coming from the view of the foxhole.

maggs 8 Reviews 489 reads
posted
3 / 9

Only eight Republicans voted for the repeal. LGBT's need to remember that in 2012. If you vote Republican you will never get gay marriage approved.

Fair_Use 29 Reviews 592 reads
posted
4 / 9

Joining the military and getting married.  And now people are crawling over broken glass to do both.  I suspect somebody is applying reverse psychology here and sitting back and watching the lemmings.  The only people to benefit from this are divorce lawyers rainmaking and those people more than happy to let someone die for them in the next war for oil.

asiantantric 163 Reviews 486 reads
posted
5 / 9

vote democratic and they will tax and spend our money till we are broke. then we will have no money to party. Is that what you want.

mjp1966 15 Reviews 531 reads
posted
6 / 9

Posted By: asiantantric
vote democratic and they will tax and spend our money till we are broke. then we will have no money to party. Is that what you want.
You mean, as opposed to the Teapublicans, who will spend our money while continuing to run up the balance on the credit card and cutting off vital programs (Medicare, Social Security) whose contribution to the debt is microscopic compared to money-suckers like the military, all in the vain hope of staving off the pain for just a little while longer? All that's doing is putting things off and making things worse for future generations, which isn't any better (and, in many ways, is a whole lot worse). Is that what YOU want? Are you that selfish and short-sighted?

Anyway, why are we even discussing this here? Shouldn't this thread be on the P&R board?

Fair_Use 29 Reviews 478 reads
posted
7 / 9

Yeah, but the SocialGreenacratists have an excellent plan.  No one knows what it is, including them.  But that the fun of it.

TSRachel See my TER Reviews 469 reads
posted
8 / 9

it only makes my heart go hard and my cock go soft when I read how some of you really feel about EQUAL rights for the GLTB community...well I served proudly in the Army as a MP(95-B), personally guarded Colin Powell and did my 3 years with a honorable discharge and the Army begging me to stay and go through OCS(Officer's Candidate School), but I guess I took what the old motto was to heart..."Be ALL you can be"...so I did...look at me now...haha...dfk, Rachel

matto313 451 reads
posted
9 / 9

I was 95B as well... I don't think sexuality should matter at all in the service.

Posted By: TSRachel
it only makes my heart go hard and my cock go soft when I read how some of you really feel about EQUAL rights for the GLTB community...well I served proudly in the Army as a MP(95-B), personally guarded Colin Powell and did my 3 years with a honorable discharge and the Army begging me to stay and go through OCS(Officer's Candidate School), but I guess I took what the old motto was to heart..."Be ALL you can be"...so I did...look at me now...haha...dfk, Rachel

Register Now!