The standard TER review form does not prompt for certain information specific to TS providers.  As a result, a lot of important information on TS providers goes missing from most TER TS reviews.  Some reviewers are better than others at remembering to include some of this information in the written portion of their reviews but if the review form could be modified to specifically prompt for the following items TS reviews would become much more useful to the members of TER:

Functionality:  rock hard, semi-erect, flaccid
Versatility:  top, bottom, versatile, don’t know
Cock size (when erect):  5 or less, 5-6, 7-8, 9-10, 10+
Circumcised:  yes, no
Ejaculates:  yes, no, did not request


These items could be added to the existing review form in the section “Provider’s Appearance” under the last item “Transsexual” which has menu choices of “[blank]”, “no”, “yes.preOp”, “yes.postOp”.  Alternatively a specific review form just for TS reviews could also be developed which would keep any confusing from arising with only one form.  

BTW these should all become searchable items as well.  In addition it would be very helpful to be able to search TS PROFILES ONLY for most reviewed providers and by the most prolific reviewers (top 50 in each category is probably plenty).

We sincerely hope that TER will give serious consideration to these suggestions as they would significantly enhance the usefulness of TS reviews and profiles.   This should make TER the most comprehensive place, by far, for TS reviews by as most other TS review boards are also deficient in obtaining this information on a consistent basis from their TS reviewers.

Regards,


TS Tempted

The following message has been posted in the Suggestion & Policy forum:

TER Review Form Missing Important TS Data - Posted by TS Tempted, 12/18/2007
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion_boards/viewMsg.asp?BoardID=4&Page=1&Messageid=3926&FromEdit=1


This message links them to the post just above this one - “Suggestions for the TER Review Form – An Open Message to TER Admin”.   I have also emailed admin with a link to this thread as well.  

Rather than clutter up the S&P forum, what I’d like for you all to do is post a reply to this thread endorsing these changes as well, sort of a ‘virtual petition’ if you will.  Don’t know if it will do any good but it never hurts to ask.  

Thanks to everyone in advance.

Regards,


TS Tempted


-- Modified on 12/18/2007 3:24:08 PM

... search and review information. Keep up the good work!

For what its worth, I think these are excellent suggestions and I hope they will be implemented.

According to one of the more knowledgable and reliable powers-that-be at TER our suggestions have been approved in record setting time.  Apparently the wheels are already in motion to add the additional fields to TS reviews.  Stay tuned all.

Now all we have to do is get more members to write more TS reviews…

Thanks for everyone’s support on this issue.

Take care,


TS Tempted


-- Modified on 12/18/2007 6:12:31 PM

Hobbyists should also be required to post stats when posting reviews too doncha think?

Giggle...

Functionality:  rock hard, semi-erect, flaccid

Versatility:  top, bottom, versatile, don’t know

Cock size (when erect):  2" or less..., 5-6, 7-8, 9-10, 10+(freebie)

Circumcised:  yes, no

Ejaculates:  yes, no, was unable to even with viagra...

and add...

Bathed:  yes, no, never

Giggle,
TS Jamie

I'd love to write a TS review...If I could find one that can still squirt and doesn't get all pushy and stuff.

How about another one for:

Turns off cell phone during session??

I resemble that remark...
This is very good news.. I was wondering if there was some specifics in the review....

I would hope for an honest review, good or bad.. That is the only way one can tune their services, honest feedback..
If I am doing something or not doing something I most definitely would like to know.. SO far I have NO complaints, Not many reviews on that note either, just a couple at one of my sites.. Um Guess I should link those on my other sites too.. Good idea!!

Two rock hard thumbs up!

Does this filter work for anyone?...it just seems to return all the results not filtered for coock size at all...