Here's a perfect BP ad.  I would see her and feel very confident the girl is for real.

I wonder how long it takes the BP to screen pics and delete cock pictures that providers post?  She has reviews, link posted below.  In her ad, she claims to be 150lbs.  After looking at that cock picture, I'm wondering her final weight should she have SRS?  My bet is 142lbs

Being in Jersey i've had my eye on her for quite awhile, seems like the real deal...everything  
checks out. Unfortunately, I'm on I.R. and can't take advantage of ALL the talent that seems to be
cumming our way! Dammit!!  
  Karina in Edison/ Ivy Coxx in A/C / Chase up in Seacaucus/   Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr!!!    Take advantage while they're here guys, you know we're due for a dry spell right after...  

Posted By: LATSDog

I wonder how long it takes the BP to screen pics and delete cock pictures that providers post?  She has reviews, link posted below.  In her ad, she claims to be 150lbs.  After looking at that cock picture, I'm wondering her final weight should she have SRS?  My bet is 142lbs

In AC a few months ago.  Initially outcall only but agreed to in call after I passed on the outcall.  Very awkward meeting in her apt, next time I'd do the outcall somehow.  She is like her photos, a hot mixture of asian and black with a huge very functional cock.

Nice... hadn't checked.  All boxes checked then.  Wish there were more girls/ads like this.  May give her a try.

Given the amount of Tgirls using GG photos I'm surprised we rarely see any photos of hard cocks constrained under panties.  I suppose many girls like to tuck so they look like girls in photos, but seeing evidence of a cock would dispel the fake GG photo issue.  If a girl is particularly passable and hot, the sight of a hard cock under panties would really help dispel it being TGTBT.

But that's a damn fine suggestion NJjohn. I think the only time I've ever seen that was Lillian Diamond (used to be Eva Rain)...and what a spectacular photo THAT was! OMG!! Still haven't had the pleasure...
(But hope to SOON!)
  But yeah. makes total sense...And yet the other reason may be the fact that 99.9% of girls "exaggerate" just a little when it comes to size perhaps?! Just a theory...
 (and thanks for the heads-up re: Ivy and the incall...I'll definately keep that in mind).....
     

Ad is taken down but in response to  "why no covered cock shots" Backpage about 3 years ago started taking ads down that showed any cock in the picture. It wasnt until about the middle of 2013 that i noticed them starting to allow some cock pics to be posted. But thats why most ads dont have any non-covered cock shots.

and all this time thought the girls have been " sneaking" their cock-pics on backpage before BP takes them off. i was worried that BP would start interfering with the hot, bulging panty pics (see Dark Ivy-orange county)as well.  
i think the bulged panty is the next best sexy advertising since going all the way with the untucked cock hanging out of the panties was being disallowed by BP.