holy moly whats going on in New York? They're all here: ts Vo, ts Carmen Cruz, ts Prue, ts Lisa Lawrence, ts Ivy, ts Ednita...who to see who to see??? Wouldn't it be nice to be able to afford them all, but if you were to choose one?
Im so frustrated, after months of eros and TER, still haven't taken the plunge.
I am looking for a real pretty girl who just loves to have sex.
Am I being way to picky?
I hear ts Prue doesn't bottom, I hear Lisa Lawrence isn't that pretty in person though I love her movies, reviews on ts ednita are all outstanding but all I have to go on is her pictures and I think you only visit her if you want to be the bottom though I would love to see that tool, ts Ivy pics are hot but the reviews are way mixed, ts Carmen Cruz is hot but only a few reviews, ts Vo another movie favorite of mine and is probably my best bet but my only tiny complaint is that shes not exactly the skinniest or shortest girl in the world
what do u guys think?

None of the above.  Go see Jasmin Thai.....lovely lady, terrific setting, and great provider !

shemview:

Jasmin Thai continues to receive consistently high accolades from houndog and others.  Related link below is to a recent discussion (and other links) that you may find useful if you are seriously interested in JT.

A recent photo to tempt you:

She looks ok. and she advertises on TER almost every day or people do it for her, it seems like she's desperate.

anybody else have any thoughts before these girls leave town??? or shall we go with Jasmin, who is from New York?

I've heard some describle a session with Ednita as "THE EDNITA EXPERIENCE".

I make it a strict habbit of NEVER, NEVER EVER  seeing any girl who is "uncut"....but for Ednita I think I would make an exception.

Bring me back a T-shirt will ya buddy :P

Why do you never see any girl who is uncut ?  I also prefer cut vs uncut, so I'd like to hear why from another TS hobbyist.

WaylonSmithers asked,
Why do you never see any girl who is uncut ?  I also prefer cut vs uncut, so I'd like to hear why from another TS hobbyist.

______________________________________________________________________


It's my personal preference because when I see an uncut cock I think dirty and unclean and no way do I wanna put it in my mouth.  No smegma for me thanks....my take.

Also there was some sort of new recent study that said cut cocks were healthier overall because as the head is exposed to air and rubbing on clothes, it allows the penis head to "toughen" allowing it a significant increase in NOT contacting infections, including HIV.
Here, i found it.












It used to be called the unkindest cut. But now the head of the one of the world's largest Aids charities believes we are on the brink of a revolution in attitudes to circumcision.

Richard Feachem, executive director of the Global Fund to Fight Aids, Tuberculosis and Malaria, said research revealing the protective effect of circumcision against HIV was set to change parental expectations and medical practice across the world. Instead of viewing the operation as an assault on the male sex, it was increasingly being seen as a lifesaving procedure which every parent would want for their sons.

Removing the foreskin is thought to harden the glans (head) of the penis, making it less permeable to viruses. Research conducted in 2005 showed the transmission of HIV from women to men during sex was reduced by 60 per cent if the men were circumcised.

A study published last month calculated that if all men in sub-Saharan Africa were circumcised, it would prevent almost six million new cases of HIV infection and save three million lives over the next 20 years...(excerpt)

http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/health_medical/article1217831.ece

I tried to see her twice.  Both times she seemed very cautious on the phone.  The second time, I got to the corner and made the second call and she started asking me what I wanted to do with her.  I told her I didnt like to talk about that over the phone.  She hung up on me.  Am I missing something?  I always thought it was a
no-no to talk about that stuff on the phone.  But she acted like my reluctance made me a cop.  
I came away thinking maybe SHE was a cop.  This is all pretty confusing considering her positive reputation on this board.

wow that's sound stupid ..+HIV can happend to Cut and Uncut same % honey...and Uncut can get +HIV more than Cut?oh....sound stupid to me....

Seems only fair I should provide you with her links as well.

BTW - TS Alter Ego is referring to the fact that Ednita is extremely well reviewed:

http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=15601

Unfortunately, for all these reviews, the most recent is Sep-06.  Her ad indicates that she is available in NY through 1-Dec.  Since she is based in LA, perhaps that explains some reticence over NY appointments.  There are over 100 references to Ednita here on this discussion board but nothing current enough to shed any more light on TSAE’s recent disappointment.

Take care,

TS Tempted

Wow, all those messages and of course the usual shills for Jasmin Thai to sort through.  Whatever. They are missing the point: shemview has listed choices that are all well hung TS's. I have dated and reviewed four on the list: Lisa Lawrence (years ago), Ednita recently, Vo (many times), Ivy (over a year ago), but I would like to see Prue and Cruz. Jasmin who I also saw when she first started is not in the same league, small bat. My favorite is Vo, because I've always had a great time with her, and she is not a clock watcher. Functionality is key with me. Ednita was a little too aggressive for me, but I can understand why some guys love her. I thought Ivy was beautiful, but too expensive and more rules than a cricket match. I saw Lisa Lawrence many years ago when she wasn't living in LA, nice time. My recommendation for great service the way you want it is to have a conversation with Vo first and talk with her about your desires. And that one message responding to the post about the research study on AIDS and uncut penises. Do I have to say it? STUPID!

becareful411 said,

wow that's sound stupid ..+HIV can happend to Cut and Uncut same % honey...and Uncut can get +HIV more than Cut?oh....sound stupid to me....

______________________________________________________________




The point is, a "cut" or circumsized penis will inherently build its own natural defense against a myriad of infections.  In the case of HIV, it is possible to contract it if the head gets an abrasion or "rugburn" but if penis head is cut the chances of sustaining an abrasion is sigificantly less, because penis is less tender.

Not hard to understand.

Some girls ask you straight up what you want, and then its up to you to tell them.  I'm not sure if this is good enough to circumvent actual arrest or prosecution, but that is how some do it.  If you don't some will get angry and/or hang up, which is  exactly what Ednita did....Unfortunately she did it to me too because at the time I was too shy to say what I wanted over the phone like that.

Just make sure that when you tell said girl you want her to fuck you in the ass, jam her cock down your throat, dick slap you, and cum on your face and mouth,  just make sure NOBODY is around.  Neighbors listening in can be quite embarassing.  lol

There is no conclusive evidence even in your slanted article presented that supports the theory that HIV easily passes through the 'less hardened' glans of the uncut.  HIV cannot pass through unbroken skin.  HIV enters the bloodstream during intercourse through the porous urethra tissue.  HIV is .12 microns in diameter and skin provides a barrier to pathogens less than .08 microns in diameter.  HIV is too large to pass through skin.  Even if you believe the article's theory that circumcision 'toughens the glans' how do you know that this 'toughening' does not increase the skins permiability to pathogens?  Perhaps your 'tough glans' is now permiable to pathogens of .12 microns or less due to it's biological alteration.  'Tougher' and 'less permiable' are not synonyms.

As for your 'rug burn' argument: who the hell goes fucking someone while they have a case of rug burn on their cock?  This is a lifestyle and sexual practice choice, not a condition inherent to occur simply because one is uncut.  Perhaps the lower coefficient of friction of a smoother, less 'tough glans' decreases the incidence of abrasion during intercourse.  That avenue of reasoning does not get explored though as it does not support your bias.

Smegma really is a non-issue since the common availability of running water and soap.  Welcome to the 19th century!  If you are turned off by uncut cocks, just avoid them.

Christ guy, next you'll be telling me I should grind a rasp file up and down my penis daily to turn it into a cylinder of callous mass in the interest of disease control.

Another Uncircumcised Philistine heard from: refer to the original scientific study not the anecdotal evidence, i.e. "rug burns". Incidentally, I have no preference with cut or uncut, as long as the TS keeps it clean and tasty. Everyone is entirely too touchy when it "cums" to their own penis.  (LOL)

You can't refer to the original scientific study.  1)  It isn't cited in the article,... 2)It wouldn't stand up to scientific scrutiny as the data reported hasn't been reverified  3) You have no idea what 'anecdotal evidence' means as it is testimony passed on by word of mouth, hence the 'scientific study' being both uncited and unverified is the only 'anecdotal evidence'.  The original use of 'rug burn' is an analogy.  Even if this mysterious 'scientific study' presents true data it is only a statistical analysis of geographic disease frequency.  All it determines is that West Africans have lower incidences of HIV than East and Southern Africans.  The authors take it upon themselves to conclude the lower incidence is due to the higher rates of circumcision in the West to which there is no data to confirm.  They never bother to isolate the variables of sexual practices, pre-existing HIV populations, or other lifestyle differences that can influence disease transfer.  Then readers further leap to conclude this evidence must apply to all populations of uncut versus cut again when there is no data to support such a conclusion.

Get over the mental weakness of believing everything you read when authors try to hide behind the phrase 'scientific study'.  You treat it like Moses, halo beaming bright, decended from Mt. Sinai and dropped the stonecarved article at your feet.  Through history there have been plenty of 'scientific studies' 'proving' things like Germans are superior to other ethnicities at everything and blacks are unfit to fly war planes because they will revert to their ape ancestry when placed under stress.  Not long ago there was 'scientific study' posted on this board where  authors couldn't even properly perform simple arithmatic.  http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion_boards/viewmsg.asp?MessageID=15440&boardID=19&page=.

The problem with taking the cicumcision article lightly is it promotes ignorance about a terminal disease and who's to 'blame' for spreading it.  Often these 'scientific studies' are politically motivated.  It's got little to do with a flap of foreskin or the penis it shrouds.

"I am looking for a real pretty girl who just loves to have sex.
Am I being way to picky?"

He isn't specifically looking at the girls you list in particular, nor a hung girl.  He's looking for a pretty girl who loves sex and listed those girls as examples not as only example.  Anecdotal evidence suggests Jasmin is both pretty and loves sex.  She shouldn't be faulted if she performs her job at a high level and has legions of happy customers that promote her.  You saw something in her once to the point where you rated her an 8,9.  You also admit in the review you became a repeater. "Overall, when she is aroused she is a ten.".  Those are your words.  Suddenly something in her changed?  You even admit in recent post she's better looking than when you first met her. "I knew her when she was new on the scene, and I liked her better then. Granted she is a lot better looking now and more passable".  While her adoring customers specify why they love her, you run a smear campaign against her without ever specifying the root of your gripe.  Why can't you enlighten the board?  Maybe you can save some of us stupid people from the terror that awaits us; the terror that turned you off.  Anecdotal evidence indicates she's a quality provider.  Anecdotal evidence doesn't imply she's like Ana.

-- Modified on 11/23/2006 12:48:02 AM

You may pass what they are saying as "unscientific" and "bullshit", but I'm buyin the bullshit because it sounds quite plausible, that an uncut cocks head would be more tender and therefore more susceptible to infections.

Not only that, but I truly believe there is a reason the bible references having circumcision as benefit to your health.  I know lots of people will sneer at that, but believe it or not, there is wisdom in the bible.  

Cut for me please.

Your uncut aversion probably existed before you read that article.  You used the article to further confirm what you want to believe in the first place.  I doubt the article changed your opinion on the safety issues surrounding circumcision.  It didn't change you from an uncut lover to an uncut avoider.  Your opinion existed prior to the article.

 Historically circumcision was not consistently practiced by Jews during biblical times.  Circumcision went in and out of fashion depending on the mandates of different leaders.

 The Apostles preached against circumcision as evidenced in Acts 15 1-21 and Acts 21:17-25.  Care you to take that biblical advice into account?

-- Modified on 11/25/2006 7:20:15 PM