She had one rip off review by a reputed rewier and then a nice review by a newbie. Do you think it is self posted? There cannot be so much variance between reviews.

No offense to Halibibi but his experience was clearly a case of thinking with the other head.  What WAS he thinking when he goes to see someone who was clearly under the influence when he called her on the phone.  Really, what could he have expected - maybe they were both on the same wavelength?

pamcatrac is indeed a newbie but does have two other reviews to his credit which seem consistent with other reviews of the same ladies.  English may not be his first language but he’s gotten his experiences across pretty well and his ratings don’t seem inflated.

Now as to Natasha – clearly a lady with serious attitude, but then again I like ‘em feisty (to each his own), but I really don’t have the time for mean drunks.  It sounds like Natasha may be alright during regular hours but thanks to Halibibi we know what to watch out for - caveat emptor.

TS NATASHA'S PROFILE
http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?ID=95916

but have a different take on what you said.you said "pamcatrac is indeed a newbie but does have two other reviews to his credit which seem consistent with other reviews of the same ladies."
I think its easy to be consistent with the other reviews, you just have to read them and repeat the same stuff a little differently.
I understand that self posters these days have gotten a little smarter. they have new TER account, write a few reviews including their own to avoid detection. I may be wrong.

TSSometimes:

You have a very good point.  I should never underestimate the lengths to which someone will go to create a deception in their own (and/or their buddies) self interest.  pamcatrac has another new review today on TS Eva in Chicago so he has certainly been a busy little camper the past couple of months.  I still have a difficult time thinking someone would go to all that trouble posting multiple bogus reviews and then only give themselves 7’s.  pamcatrac’s reviews DO look a little suspicious but that would mean someone has way too much time on their hands if they’re bogus.  On a scale of -10 (totally bogus) to +10 (highly reliable) I give pamcatrac about a +1 so far.  I guess we’ll just have to see how it plays out.

Assuming Halibibi’s review isn’t bogus, then he should’ve known better than to go AND Natasha should have shown better judgment and NOT taken an appointment under the circumstances.  We’ve all made stupid mistakes so I am still inclined to give Natasha the benefit of the doubt.  Having said that, there are plenty of great ladies in the Chicago area so unless I was especially attracted to Natasha there are many other excellent choices to consider first.

Take care,

TS Tempted