I was planning a date with TS Daisy until I read a review that turned out to be bogus. I am a careful man and do not want to risk doing it with a provider who does not behave responsibly. It turns out TS Daisy is super careful and the reviewer was full of shit. I think the idea of getting providers to critique their reviews is not a bad idea. I am still trying to hook up with Daisy wish me luck see seem to be a real treat, shame one the jerk who tried to sully her reputation. Cudos for pulling the review

Sorry, fellow admirers, but did I miss where the pulled review was proven to be bogus? I'm ambivalent about any review which indicates bbfs might have occurred (it might encourage dangerous activity or just be a self-serving lie)    but I am not at all ambivalent about the need for reviews to stand unless they are either vengefully mean-spirited or clearly untrue.

The review in question was a glowing one. Not mean-spirited. The only question seemed to be was it true with regard to the bbfs (the beautiful, hot and gfe reports no one challenged).

I have posted a link to an earlier thread about multiple providers offering bbfs. I have had personal correspondence with more than a half dozen regulars who have been offered and/or indulged in bbfs with well-reviewed providers, IN THE PAST YEAR ALONE. I myself have been offered it on multiple occasions.  It does happen.

Another thread has clearly pointed out that all hobbyists do not receive the same service: sometimes bbfs is one of the services that some hobbyists are offered by some providers.  Just because a provider covers up with you, doesn't mean she always covers up with everyone. Just because you get tons of DFK doesn't mean the next guy will be so fortunate. Or perhaps the next guy will not be interested.

To call a review bogus because we don't want to believe it -- or because it wasn't true for us -- is not for me satisfactory. I do not know Daisy. I know absolutely nothing about her beyond the fact that everyone who has spoken to me about her says she is AWESOME. So why pull the review? We are all adult enough to decide for ourselves what to believe and I hope we are mature enough to protect ourselves and not allow our fantasies about  these beautiful strangers we adore to cause us to forget our mortality or tempt fate by driving drunk without a seat belt.  

I realize it's a morally equivocal world. However, reasonable people should consider the source, not ban the opinion. This is a review board. We need contrasting opinions and providers must be allowed to speak up for themselves in the face of these opinions.

Put up an asterix for 'dubious' reviews, compare the reviewer's other reviews to your own experiences, and use your head to make your own decisions, free of censorship.

Then again, if someone knows for a fact the review is bogus and has shown the Staff/Mod/Whoever that it IS bogus, then, of course, pull it.   But is that what happened? Mod? Staff? Answer? Anybody wanna chime in and tell me to shut up. Maybe delete this post?

Finally, I am forced to quote Transspoter one time. He wrote:  'I am a careful man and do not want to risk doing it with a provider who does not behave responsibly.'.
Transspoter, ,if you do not want to 'risk doing it' with someone who does not 'behave responsibly' then perhaps you should not be having sex with prostitutes -- especially extremely popular transsexual prostitutes.  In the "real world"  this behavior is innately irresponsible. Whether a prostitute utillizes condoms with all 1000 of her unknown partners or with merely 998 of them -- you are taking a risk. The "responsible" part is only in your choosing to be one of the 998 and NOT one of the 2.

Thanks for reading. Now: play safe, share love, be well.  

-- Modified on 6/19/2005 9:33:51 AM

Christ Almighty, do you get paid by the word?

Just teasing, fella, but how 'bout at least a few carriage returns?

Your concerns are duly noted, but in terms of reader attentiveness, you would be better served to get to the point sooner rather than later.

Please don't be angry -- be content to know that someone took the time to read the full content of your post and cared enough to provide some constructive criticism.

P.S. Don't think my sh*t doesn't stink either.

Hey LA,

A lot of great thoughts.  But there does seem (to me)to be a kind of double standard.  It seems that the guy is always to be believed but not the girl.

Daisy came on here and gave pretty good testimony about her side of things, even things that were not to her advantage.  Why is the reviewer given more credence?  

If indeed that review was a fake, then it was hurtful to her reputaion and should rightfully have been pulled.  When there are two conflicting "truths" out there, it's a "he said, she said" thing.  They cancel out eachother because no one knows who is telling the truth.

I don't know what the answer is.  I do think it's unfair that girls are not allowed to challenge a review because there are always 2 sides to everything (even EBAY had to start allowing that) but I don't think that's going to ever happen here.

At best, I think there should be some kind of indication with certain reviews in question that flags it, stating that it *could* be a bogus review.


Just my thoughts.  I'd love to hear more.


P.S. LA, PLEASE break you post up into different paragraphs so it's easier to read!!!!   You have a lot of good thoughts.

So I should keep it in my pant? I agree this type o behavior is risky however I do think the risk can be managed. I do not think all providers are stupid and want to risk serious illness with the attitude that has been expressed here. When I travel I see many TS provider who test themselves regularly and only are providers for the money to transform themselves. The earler author does have a double standard and little respect for women that provide our fun and fantisy. You rant is a good example of a many words that say nothing. I think most providers do not want to get sick or make someone ill. In addition I read everyone of TS Daisy's reviews, none made the same claim of BBFS. Stay Safe brothers and sisters.

I've never met Daisy, but I am very familiar with her reviews and reputation. So I'm looking forward to meeting her someday. When I read that partricular review I felt it was just another guy letting us all know what a suave, talented, irresistable, and oh so superior sex magnet he is. (I hate that in any review). The tone of his review, and the bbfs claim in particular, set off my bullshit meter. However, I do like to make up my own mind as to the veracity of reviews, and LA10-4's asterisk system would enhance the process more than disappearing questionable reviews. And where is the original reviewer? Would you please stand up and respond to this mess?

I do believe some reviews are bogus because i have one that says i did my sesion on my sofa
wich is not true, i always use my bed, always!!!
Also some are not fair!!! especially if the guy was not satisfied, he will write lies about the provider.
Now the issue of the 1000 clients!!!!
I have had friends who were not prostitutes and died of HIV !!!I have friends who are high demand
providers and are HIV negative, my point is ...you don`t need to be a prostitute to belong to a high risk group!!! you just need to be iresponsible!!!  ignorant or careless!!!

Life is a precious gifth!!!!
Lets take care of ourselves!
peace.

TER Mods are kept well abreast of the providers, or at least the quality providers and they, as well as a majority of members who know Daisy, know that the review claim that she went BB was a load of crap..... Blowing up his ego for whatever reason did Daisy an injustice and her insistance on safety should not have to be proven.

Any one who has been with her knows this guy was lying to fill his own twisted needs.

bare back I know... but what about the FS?

Bare Back Full Service.

AKA Sex w/o a condom.