Reached out to a POT SB because I liked her look and her profile.  Then came the disclaimer at the end of the profile:  "I am not a prostitute!" "Don't treat me like a call girl" etc... I think you get the idea. Still, because of the way she looked and some details in her profile, I was still intrigued.  I had seen enough profiles to get the sense that she was different than the girls not looking for intimacy, you know, the ones who think "platonic" time with a hot chick is something we old timers should pay for.  Despite the possibility that I was reading her wrong, and she was just looking to get paid to be arm candy, I set up a meet and greet. Had a great time.  Over drinks brought up the topic of the arrangement and asked me some very specific questions about what I enjoyed, sexually.  So I'm even more intrigued.  We agreed on a very reasonable per meet number and continued to enjoy our initial meeting. Walked her to her car, a quick kiss, and she was off.  She texted me the next day to say she had a nice time, looked forward to our arrangement BUT....wanted to get to know me better before we jumped into bed.  Hmmmmm....how to play this? No way was I giving her our per meet $$$$ simply to take her to dinner.  So...I took her to dinner to find out.  Over dinner I asked her point blank..."are you expecting that our arrangement begins tonight, over a platonic dinner?"  She looked at me like I had two heads.  Essentially, her answer was of course not.  She just likes to get the "business" end of the arrangement out of the way first.  Then, get to know a guy, and then move forward with the "mutually beneficial" piece which she defined as great sex for both of us.  Interesting.  I left her that night with a kiss...definitely more sensuous than the first, and getting me even more interested.  We " went out" a couple of more times, each getting more intimate, but nothing like a BCD date.  No $$$$ changed hands.  I found myself enjoying time with her,  just like a civilian dating situation that was going well.  I finally said I would like to start the arrangement.  She agreed...the interesting thing is I got the sense that she wondered why it took me so long!  We set up a BCD date and had off the chart sex.  We have been at it for three months and have completely abandoned the unique process that got us to the bedroom.  No dinners, no movies..nothing remotely like dating.  She comes over, we share some bourbon (yes, that was one of the things in her profile that caught my eye), we fuck for a couple of hours, she leaves.  It has been interesting... Unlike any other female approach that I have encountered on SA.  The funny thing is, I would "date" this woman in a heartbeat (she's 35). I just know that is not an option...she likes the $$$$!!!!  Just thought I would share.... By the way, any good bourbons you're recommending?

Now that's a good turn of events to hear about. I had one time where I met up with a POT Sb, productive first meet, discussed allowance and she wanted to start off with a monthly but ended up agreeing on a PPM. Had first followup date set and the day before I reconfirm our meeting she hits me with the "is the allowance starting tomorrow? I'd like to get to know each other better and just let any intimacy occur naturally and not have this be all about sex" I let her know that's ok with me but the allowance and intimacy go hand in hand. She then says if we are going to have sex she wants a 2 meet up allowance to which I remind her we already had an agreement. She then goes off and asks if I have problems with "trust". I let her know that trust goes both ways here and that we should go just our separate ways now. She backtracked a little and wanted to go ahead and have our date and just hang out together. I decided to drop her because she seemed squirrely and there was too much drama right off the bat.  

No. You did the right thing. My experience has been that if they start getting  squirrely as the reality of fucking for money gets closer then the sex usually sucks anyway.

A little get to know ya, mutual attraction, building the anticipation, and then the NSA SB/SD fun. Too many guys are treating the sugar bowl like it's a way to negotiate with hookers over a cup of coffee in hopes they'll cut a good deal because rent is due. Hence the "I am not a prostitute! Don't treat me like a call girl etc..." from the good ones.

Love Woodford Reserve (don't mix it--serve over rocks and sip)

There was an article in the Atlantic magazine years ago about the best bourbons and the auther just raved about Rock Hill Farms. Drink it with a splash of water to bring out the flavors.

It's great that you and she both felt motivated enough to give it time and let it develop naturally. It's a real contrast to some recent threads that say don't waste your time. Just goes to prove once again that YMMV. Whatever works, works!

checking online, none of these abbreviations seem to fit the context we are in here, haha.

I like wheated bourbons so my go-to is Makers (and yes, definitely try the 46) but I have also found Larceny to be a great one and it's even less expensive than Makers.  I've had the Pappys and while the 10yo was nothing special, the 23yo was off the hook.  Highly recommended if you have the means.  As for non-wheated bourbon, I found Breckenridge was pretty good.

Potential

POT SB = Potential Sugar Baby

I've been wondering why so many of these SB had great asses.

a bunch of fucking letters you make up that nobody else can figure out.  Having done that, you consider yourself very smart because nobody else can guess its meaning.  2nd and 3rd graders use this a lot.

http://whiskyadvocate.com/2010/02/02/malt-advocate-whisky-awards-artisan-whiskey-of-the-year-stranahans-colorado-whiskey/

old forester 1870 & birthday, thomas handy sazerac rye, george T stagg kentucky straight, hillrock, michters mash, reservoir rye