Finally, after months of working the sugar bowl, I am finding women from 23-33, about five more lately, who are so eager to get started (i.e., get sugar income) that they actually suggest the bcd time for, or at, the initial meet and greet.
JD, with an amazing body, Just wasn't ready for fun at the second meeting, took my money, and later texted that she'd like to meet again (hasn't happened). LM wanted to go really slow, and only allowed petting, some way into the arrangement, so that was dropped.
A good number seem to think that they are going to get money for no intimacy; some say so on their profile but many only reveal that in messaging. Some are so new this is their rookie mindset, and others have fielded messages for weeks or months, yet still hope to find that slow/no sex SD, despite their experience.
So, what I am saying is, the hype gets millions to sign up, and, quite predictably, you will find they span the spectrum in what "sugar" they are intent on providing. And their decisions on this can evolve slowly or quickly, or not at all. Given this variability, I believe you play your cards totally to meet your own needs, and not read these threads with the experiences of others as rigid templates.
Are you willing to consider another face to face meeting to tie intimacy with "allowance", as opposed to doing it in a message? The risk here may be spending more money without getting bcd that round. Yet it might be more effective with this particular woman. But reading the body language and being convincing with your own can be a help, too. As always, with all of the suggestions here, YMMV.