I've made this comment in other postings.  I frankly don't think it happens near as often as our hopeful fellow hobbyists.  

In my other civi experiences - including two marriages - I found that my partner didn't always cum in the same manner - actions or words.  Yet I find when I read a review of a provider and then go see her, often her "cumming" is exactly as I read.  What a TURNOFF!!

I know I'm not "orgasm giver-king" - wish I was.  But with a couple ladies it was if Cassanova had possessed my body.  Sadly, I don't think so.

Hell, I'm not even sure I eat pussy that good - 'cause I'm pretty sure my inept screwing ain't doing it!

Wait..maybe it's my intensely good looks and muscular build!?

Wait...maybe it's my wallet!  
(sorry ladies)

Dude, you gotta be kidding!   If you know what you're doing with a woman, you can almost always get her to O.   Find the clit and the G spot and treat her right.   Helps if you like what you're doing.  And you know it's for real when the lady is making what are obviously involuntary reactions to your fine work.   Maybe you should google "G spot".

The situation you describe sounds like both hobbyist and provider are happy with what they've gotten; whether the lady's O is "real" or not doesn't seem to matter to them -- at least in the reviews -- so why does it matter to you?

If you feel that all of these accounts of provider orgasm are phoney -- fine -- now you're forewarned.  For myself, I only know about the experiences I've had; as for other peoples' reviews, since I wasn't there, I can't second guess them.  Perhaps you know something about them that I don't.  

People content themselves with harmless "delusions" all the time.  When was the last time you were in a restaurant having a really awful meal, yet told the server, when he or she asked, that "everything is fine" ?

Lighten up, my friend.  Life is short.

Re: Delusional Machoism or Creative Writing

I'm not sure how psychosexual this question is, Nuvela Man,

but given the benefit of the doubt....performance and phantasy is in the brain of the beholder. My question to you is this one: when you read reviews of a film [often done by film critics with some type of cinematic education], how often do you disregard the reviews and watch the film anyway?

If you want 100% verifiable veracity, I suggest you get out of the paid sex game and start meeting with civvies. There, you'll get the good, the bad and sometimes even the ugly, completely unvarnished. You do need to understand that providers are PERFORMERS, for the benefit of their audience. This doesn't mean that they never, ever have orgasms with their clients - I would venture to say that many of them do, since you need to be somewhat sexual to handle the pressures of the daily duties in the sex industry. But to ask for videos...hmmm...that would be like me going to, say, Le Bernardin in New York, and asking Eric Ripert to send me a video of him making an intricate seafood dish, in advance, rather than just me going there and assuming it's going to be a good meal based on the subjective opinions of many diners. And that's bearing in mind that not everyone is enamored of classic French seafood cuisine!

Now, as related to your headline "delusional machoism or creative writing;" how about "impressionable performance" and "writing under the influence?" Otherwise, it would be like the actor insulting his/her audience...and who wants that? Don't we all want to leave the theatre with the impression of a fabulous performance in mind?

It's either Placido Domingo on Memorex in your living room or schlepping to the Metropolitan Opera and potentially getting an obscured seat on third level balcony,
the Love Goddess

It sucks being a TS when it comes to orgasams...

Because there's just no faking it...

Giggle,
TS Jamie