I can do without. Full sleeve tats and chest tats are definitely a deal breaker. The nose ring, can't figure that one out. Not sure I could have dinner and sit across the table from a gal with something hanging out of her nose. Always been a big fan of the female form, and it doesn't need graffiti to improve it, that just doesn't work at all.
Wondering what the ink situation is on SB's in your area. I'm finding an increasing number of profiles with at least one tat showing and more often with a lot of ink on several body parts. From my unscientific observations, age is not a correlating factor, as might have been true 5 or 10 years ago. I generally don't have a problem with, nor am I distracted by one or two smaller tats on say a shoulder or ankle. But when she starts adding more, I'm less and less attracted.
.
And for my taste, I'm especially not a fan of women with "full sleeves" and/or massive chest tats. Nor am I attracted to a SB with several tats on her legs or on her face. I suppose there is also a correlation of non-ear piercings as well and again, not a fan. I really dislike the idea of possibly getting hooked like a fish on someone's lip or nose ring. While I am at it, nipple piercings turn me off as well.
.
I'll note that the occurrence of tattoos on SB's does not seem to be out of line with women in the civvy (or pro) world, but I really only have empirical and anecdotal data from my local market of Los Angeles.
.
Anyone seen anything different? And what's your take on how tattoos affect the attractiveness, availability, demanded sugar, BCD close rates, and BCD performance from Inked women?
I share your feelings about ink — more than just one or two small ones starts to turn me off. I just don’t get it.
On the other hand I met an escort with a large almost mural on her side. Had to be 120 square inches and not terribly well done. But she was gorgeous and funny and damn smart so I let it go.
And she was my ATF for three years until she broke my heart. That’s another story.
So I try to keep an open mind. Face Piercings are a dealbreaker for me, if that counts.
I had an SB last year who had a few tats. I was able to look past them because she was gorgeous (in my eyes). No piercings, thank god. But her tats were small and in areas that were not obnoxious.
Piercings are a big turn off, especially the nose and lips. I cannot fathom nipple or clit piercings. Makes me cringe and feel like asking why ruin a beautiful body, but to each their own. The one piercing though that I find myself conflicted ove though is the tongue. Initially I think yuk, but then I start wondering what it would feel like during a BBBJ would feel like. Lol
Have a date with a tongue pierced girl. Looking forward to the test drive.
I feel the same way as previous posters. One or two well placed and I'm ok - but too many and it doesn't matter how good looking, it's just too distracting for me. And I seem to be seeing many more of them on SA.
I had one with a tongue piercing and the bbbj was good - it wasn't any different (in my opinion). However, when it came to DFK, the sound of her stud hitting my teeth from time to time still echoes in my head! Not doing that again.
I can do without. Full sleeve tats and chest tats are definitely a deal breaker. The nose ring, can't figure that one out. Not sure I could have dinner and sit across the table from a gal with something hanging out of her nose. Always been a big fan of the female form, and it doesn't need graffiti to improve it, that just doesn't work at all.
Tats and piercings are horrible. But try finding any young woman these days without them. Females tend to be "social" meaning they often are like lemmings to trends. They all have to "show their individuality" by all doing exactly the same thing.
Yeah, nose piercings look like boogers hanging out of their nose. Real sexy there, girl.
Tats don,t bother me hardly at all, and I've seen some huge ugly ones! I've also seen a few that were artistic, restrained, and truly enhanced a girls body. But piercings especially nose rings are gross as shit! That said, one of my current favorites is a stunning brunette with a nearly perfect figure. No tats, but pierced nipples. Why do they do that? I just don't get it.
Have one or two tasteful tattoos. I have one. The nose rings I have an issue with. I’m ok with a few tattoos tho.
Wanna never get laid by a woman under 30, or unenthusiastically laid at best? Go off on her tattoos. That's why so many of the women's profiles mention that they have them--because the older guys on the site write them constantly saying they hate tattoos, why would they ruin their bodies, etc etc. They might still hook up with a guy who disdains their looks, but that guy won't get anything close to full engagement.
Personally, I barely notice tattoos anymore. I've seen so many of them at this point, I'm immune. Also, seriously, you guys let a bad dolphin tat or some shitty Narnia backpiece get in the way of some intensely satisfying fun? Come on now.
My current #1 was a little shy about having one - she normally presents as very professional and conservative in overall manner. But during our first time BCD, she did warn me that she had a tattoo on her upper right shoulder blade. Turns out it's the 82nd Aviation Regiment's crest. My SB is kinda badass, actually.
a few months ago.
In my profile, I originally said ‘don’t do well with tattoos’
Had to take it out after I calculated it was eliminating about
half of the SB.
I’m in Italy for a month and searched for SB from there plus some of the surrounding countries - tats are very uncommon leading me to believe its more a US thing.
I've made it a practice to not put any "negative filters" in my profile text. I think statements like "I don't do well with..." or "please don't bother if..." or "no time wasters" etc. can only serve to eliminate potentially viable SB's from contacting me. I even encourage contact by stating that I will respond to messages from all "local" SB's, as I have heard feedback that not getting a reply is frustrating and irritating to an SB (and to me as well). Of course, I will define "local" based on how much I want to actually talk to her.
.
When I see these types of statments in an SB's profile, it's usually a flag to me that she's been on the site for a long time (could be good or bad), has been either burned or scammed by someone (and will have trust issues), or has some serious GPS issues (feels entitled to my wallet). So when I see a negative (or a bunch of negative) filter(s), I'm more likely to pass.
.
Besides, if I can't stand looking at the "Twin .45 pistol" tats on her hips, I just flip her over for doggy and hope I don't see a full on mural tat of Tupac, Willy Nelson, or Ted Nugent on her back.
Only did a one time BCD with a young hispanic SB, she had a huge tat of fruits or something on her left side, both front and back. Couldn't escape it. Looked like a hat Carmen Miranda would wear. Felt like I was shopping at a fruit and veggie shop. Her pics hide it well or were taken before she got the tat, the string bikini pic she sent me did not show that at all.
I'll bet she was too young to know who Caren Miranda is, too. 
.
Speaking of Latinas, as I am in Los Angeles there is a high percentage of them on the site, and a fair number of them grew up in, or near gangs. One of the things I notice about this group of SB's is that many of them, perhaps 25-35% have a name tattooed on the back of their shoulder, in script. I've occasionally asked and been told it was the name of their ex-BF, a (perhaps deceased) sibling, or their child.
I can't remember her name, but although it has to be at least ten years since I have seen her I can see remember her ex's name, Eduardo. She had a tramp stamp with his name on it and every time I'd fuck her doggie I'd have to look at his name which at first bothered me a bit, but then I decided to have some fun with it, so every time I'd do her from behind I'd smack that ass and say "take that Eduardo you pinche puta" jaja
I’m a bit old school, admittedly, on this, but tats used to correlate with class, and low class is very unsexy to me. Now it’s a generational thing, or maybe a judgment thing. I prefer none. One or two small ones in certain places, like the shoulder or ankle, don’t bother me. A large one on the lower back is called a tramp stamp for a reason. I passed on a SB with large tats on her thighs last week. On the other hand, I’ve seen profiles for a couple of women with a full sleeve whom I might have considered, because they were pretty, fit, and sexy otherwise.
I wonder if some SBs are on SA to get money to pay for the last tat or to save up for the next one.
I don’t mind a small nose or eyebrow stud. A septum ring is something I don’t like, but I’ve considered a few women with them. Pierced nipples or a pierced labia look sexy, but the piercing interferes with oral stimulation.
In short, I like women best when they are all natural with a little grooming.
Both have been a huge plus in my book.
Old men don't like them, so the SBs that want them have a harder time finding arrangements, and it seems pretty commonplace for them to catch hate for having them at all. I could personally care less about all of the above, if you're hot you're hot, and I've found the drive to find a SD is higher with these "alternative" girls and they tend to be easier to keep around, more willing to negotiate, etc.
So please, keep up the prejudice gents, it keeps me busy.
So I guess I should be just as candid when I agree with you, you young whippersnapper you. lol
First off I will confess, any woman that looks good with ink would probably look even better without it IMHO, but just like you, i am happy that many of the "old farts" in the bowl won't see a girl with either a lot of ink or with piercings and they are missing out on a lot of pussy, but like you I have the attitude "more pussy for me."
I wouldn't have it any other way Gaga.
You usually have well reasoned responses, and you're one of the few that I'm going to miss if/when this site goes tits up.