When you look at the ratios and percentages of his data - and ignore the orders of magnitude, larger-than-average total budget he has - his findings seem pretty close to my experiences, with a few notable differences. Since he has huge amounts of disposable income, he can spend more on each SB and do so with more total SB's than an SD with a more modest budget - say $20-$40k a year for Sugar spend. It's also interesting to note that he actually wants a 2-3 date time from M&G to BCD, and he is OK with providing sugar (he never says "allowance") on non-BCD dates. Again, surplus cash makes that easy for him.
Finally, he must be in a metro area with a high percentage of POT SB's compared to "average," especially in recent months, when the overall number of new and active profiles appears to have declined by 20%-45%.
There is a lot of data and context he has not provided, like1st message to M&G rate, BCD dynamics (activities, sub vs dom, BB vs Covered, etc.), and logistics like PPM vs monthly, hoisting locations, and travelling with an SB.
But I do like his idea that Sugar budget should be set at 20-30% (and no more) of the SD's total disposable income.
Life is good
The Cat