An interesting update to the thread below regarding the platonic only tag on Seeking.  As I mentioned, I always just inquire about true intentions, since I live in a small market with a limited supply of non-whacko women.

I have an M&G coffee tomorrow with a platonic-only gal.  After we got off Seeking and onto texting, she informed me that her last arrangement was 400 ppm, that she could host if I needed her to, she loves to kiss, and that she "ADORES oral -- both ways..."

I'll update on the M&G.  Nothing may come of it because we aren't a schedule match, but the texting was fun enough that we both readily agreed to the meet.  Oh, and she's hot....so there's that....

It seems of obvious, but it's up to us to ensure we ask relevant questions about intentions, goals, and boundaries.  

 
And as mentioned in your OP on "Platonic," context matters enough that filtering out for platonic (in text or a tag) could mean missing a very viable POT.  

 
Looking forward to your post-M&G update.  

 
Life is good

 
The Cat

M&G went fairly well -- at least well enough that we have a BCD scheduled for Saturday.  I didn't ask her about the "platonic" tag on her profile, but I will if the BCD actually happens.

More to follow...