As I've floated through some of the reviews, I couldn't help but wonder if the younger providers don't obtain somewhat higher ratings because they're younger than because the experience is better. (not talking about looks score, which are overly subjective)


It would be interesting to see what the statiticians amoung might come up with for that...

If you take a look at my reviews, it's the 30+ ladies who score the points.   Life experience, combined with understanding themselves and life, makes for a much better date.  Personally, I like multi-hour appointments and dinner dates, and that may be part of it.

Boy...you've hit it right on the head.  Invariably, I've noticed that the performance reviews are universally inflated based on looks and age.  Younger and hotter looks yeild higher performance reviews than what are really earned.  I guess so many guys are so visual, they just can't seperate out looks and performance accurately.  If you ever see an ad that shows some barely 18 hottie showing her face and body clearly, especially if it's in a nasty pose of some kind, the reviews are almost always 1's or 2's.  The young ones are almost never hot in the performance department.  And, if they are actually O.K. in the performance department, they're rated higher than they should be solely because of thier good looks.  Give me a hot blooded, mature, professional, reasonably good-looking, 30-something girl any day!!!!!!!!!

ReITTO!!!

No wine before its time... Providers who are 30+ just cannot be touched. Part of it comes with maturity, however I also believe that a woman in her 30s has more than likely found peace with her self image and therefore radiates a confidence that translates into a more sexual and unihibited experience...

Jack,

I knew I liked the way you "think'd" the first time you responed to my e-mail.  Experience and maturity (does not necessarily equate to age but...)rocks, rules, and dances around the unwise youth of this endeavor (You listening ALI?...I know that was shameless but thats one rocking gal) (no insult intended toward those providers who are wise beyond their years)

i think the younger ones get higher ratings for looks more often, but for performance, life's experiences and maturity seem to win out.  PLUS I think the older providers have just been in biz longer and have a better understanding of them selves and the clients.

oh I agree totally, I just can't say enough on the subject

yes I can, www.autumn666.com

I also enjoy mature men, I guess it goes both ways. I am reflecting on the fact that someone who has had lots of life experiences, and knows themselves is nicer to be with.


hugs, A.

I have seen reviews that contain something like:  "She was incredible in bed, and her oral skills are unbelievable.  If she was 15 years younger she's be my ATF...", or some words to that effect.  My first experience in this hobby, at age 18, was a 40 year old woman.  That was 37 years ago and nothing really has changed.  By and large the more mature provider knows more about men and what they're doing to us.  This doesn't mean that there aren't younger providers who are excellent in their own right.

The single most erotic week in my life was last November in Florida.  I saw 3 providers that week:  average age almost 47, oldest was 51!  Wow!

When I first started the hobby, I went for the MYV video girl.
Since I was a newbie the higher scores went to the such girls. Then I met up with the women in their 30's or 40's and never looked back!!! I wish I could go back and change the performance rating on some of the younger women I've spent time with.

But the final decision of whether you're going to spend time with someone should be in the "details' !!

Remember that most of it is in your heads. Just imagine that this young thing actually wants to amke it with you. Fantastic

I'm so glad you've noticed..a number of things..
So when are you coming to San Diego?
Funny, my ATF's (meaning Providers I would recommend!) are all 33-45!

Warmest hugs,
Sedona

I'm in complete agreement with all the other guys who have commented on the 30+ providers.  Without exception the very best experiences I've had have been with gals over 30yr...these are the gals that know how to be a 'total woman' while the younger ones usually still have that to learn.

have gotten me really excited this morning!
Who needs coffee?! I'm bright eyed and bushy tailed now reading this! LOL

Kisses,
Sedona

I myself prefer providers over 30 hands down.  However, that wasn't the issue I was posting about.  It appeared from browsing the ads that there is likely an eleveted statistical variation on perceived performance and younger women.  We all have our own personal preferences, mine being women over 30, it just seems that the statistics guys who are on here might be able to demonstrate an edging of elevated performance ratings on younger providers.

This is similar to taller, better looking, larger chest, thinner, people getting better jobs with more money etc...

I myself have experienced both. There is only so much time a woman has in this industry and there are too many legit girls in their 20's who are just as good if not better in bed than the 30's ( the M/ashleys and Amy Taylors out there!) The young looks AND a thrilling roll in the hay... if I am going to pay $$$$$, I'm going to really go for it!

I personally believe that a lot of reviewers will give the younger providers higher marks on looks just because of their age.  In my many years of experience I do like the young pretty faces, but routinely there is something lacking in performance.  What I have found is that there are a number of very attractive mature 40+ providers out there that not only have it in the appearance department, but are more than outstanding in performance.  I think it has to be something to do with their experience in the business.  A couple of ladies that come to mind are Aria (who is retired), and Celeste who has had per profile removed but still very much available.

Now a moment of regression to my less mature self "OH, MAMA!  AUTUMN WHY ARE YOU IN SEATTLE INSTEAD OF HERE WITH ME IN ORANGE COUNTY CA!  O.k., I feel better now. (Nice pictures gal!)

Well, I'm only 42 and have been around the world (around the planet that is...grin) and have gained alot of experience (just not too much with females...grin)in life.  Relations between people takes much the kind of well rounded experience necessary to right a bestseller, you have to live it to understand and then translate it to paper right.  But I digress...hehe

Thanks for the kind words, Alec.  Glad you concur.  Those of us that really know, know that women in their 30's or 40's have it all over the young ones.  They're at peace with themselves and appreciate why we men are wired the way we're wired.  While their younger counterparts are still trying to figure out why we just stared at the hottie who walked into the bar, the 30-something lady is trying to figure out how to get her to do a 3-way with the two of us.  

So, you've seen my gal, Ali, huh?  Let me just say, to this day, she is the absolute finest provider there is anywhere.  And...I've seen the best of the best.  Looks, sweetness, professionalism, and sexual skill beyond the wildest dreams of most men (or women).  I hope my e-mails to you way back when had something to do with that experience.  Good luck to you. -jacksonlips

Most of us are looking for girls with the skills, experience and sophistication of a woman in her '40's, but the energy, freshness and taut body of a 20 year old.  In my experience, you CAN have it all, but be prepared to pay for it.  I have been with many of the most highly regarded ladies all around the country and for my money, it's alot easier to find a precoscious 25 year old with skills beyond her years than a 35 year old that REALLY has the body of a 20 year old.  This is not a absolute law, and I am a lot worse for wear myself I must admit, but its a pretty good rule of thumb from my observations.  You LA guys are pretty lucky - you have the best 20-somethings in the country with Amy Taylor and Morgan Ashley.

BofP

Only 33-45..??? I'm Crushed...*wink Kisses, Robyn

I Believe It But I May Need To See It Again eom

Jack:

Alow me to set the record straight: I have not had a date with ALi.  As you know, she is selective and rightly so (I despair of ever seeing her...smile).  I have only been communicating with her on and off this board.  But even through these simple means of communication, you will agree that her dynamic personality comes through.  Thats all I meant.  Thanks, though!

ReITTO!!! Clarification needs to be made...

I need to clarify something here. WHile we are all making general statements about age before beauty this represents an opinion of those that are posting and it is unfair to characteristically sterotype all providers below the age of 30+ as not being capable of providing the same level of service. It simply is not true. While many here obviously feel a certain way, there are exceptions to every rule and some providers who are younger but do posesses the maturity above their years. The bottom line is it depends on the individual.. A person who gets good reviews deserves the respect whether she is 20 or 40 end of story...

We should not make broad blanket statments like the ones in this thread, myself included...

I agree. I tend to like older more mature women because I can relate to them more on an emotional and mental level.. But to completely close your eyes to every provider who is under
30 is also shortsided. Need to look at the individual as well..

...who works out and is a good provider over a free session with a 20 something newbie to the business. That's how strongly I feel about it.

Time and time again, I'll go for the 20's and wish I had the 30's. But that's just me.

Well.. I am 40, in my prime, 95% of my clients do NOT review per my request, and I make a solid 6 figure income.  I escorted when in college as well.  This is definately BETTER!!