Major rewrite. I'll try to make it simpler and more informative. If you wanted to book a session and you had two choices, which one would you make:   Provider #1 has over 500 TER mostly excellent performance reviews (looks range mostly 7/8).  She's the McDonald's of Providers.  Provider #2 has verified pictures, most would judge her an 8/9 but she hasn't any reviews.  
Guys, which one would you go with and why?


-- Modified on 10/12/2006 8:20:43 PM

With me, so much depends on instinct and gut feeling.  I'd take a chance on the newbie if she appealed to me, if I like the tenor of her posts, if her website stimulates something in me, if she's open and playful when I chat with her.  I've met some of the nicest ladies I know that way.  Of course, I have some ATFs too, and I try not to neglect seeing them, too.

For me to make that decision I'd need to know more about #1. She's obviously got the quality service side covered, but is she a 8/9 in terms of looks & body, or is she more like a 6? You start your post with a bunch of ATF talk, are you saying that #1 is YOUR ATF? Or just that she's obviously someone's ATF because she's got 500 reviews?

To take a stab at an answer none the less. If I BADLY needed to book a session, I'd go with the well reviewed lady because I know my mission will be accomplished. I only TOFTT when I know I won't be terribly frustrated if it doesn't go well (ie...I've already had some great GFE loving that week and this would just be extra "play").

and always like to try a new restaurant from time to time.

So does that make sense. About as much maybe as the limited information you gave to make choices with. lol

Some times I want meat loaf, other times Mongolian yak sounds irresistable.

I usually stick to the classics but every once in a while I'll see an exotic photo, or become enamoured with someone's post on this or another site and I'm off to the races.

My picks have been quite good of late, if I do say so myself.  I guess 35+ years experience does help.

then this hobby has become an obsession or an addiction.  Either way I'm likely to make a very bad decision so I'm better off watching some porn, taking matters in hand and calming down.  Sorry I know that's not the answer you're seeking but it's what I was thinking.

I look for "something" in their pictures, ads, or posts... and even I do not know what that something is!  So for me it would be a toss up!

At 500 reviews, she's been in the biz awhile and if she is still looking great and giving top flight service, then why waste it on a rookie. We all have expendable cash in this community to overstate the obvious, but I can't say I've met anyone who wants to throw $$$$ out on I-10W. I've gotten played early in the game from ladies who want to turn you into gue with a quick HJ and a smile. So the tried and true is better than a fantasy fuck or the jack-shack queen who wants another $ to let you touch her tits.

That's who I would favor.  Experience, reliability and many good reviews mean a lot.  

Besides pictures, though, what attracts me most is the way she writes.

I would go with #1 because she takes a licking and keeps on ticking.

nice double - if #1 says ok to #2, then you are pretty safe knowing #2 is not LE.  Yep, definitely a duo session would be called for.

But maybe a good steakhouse chain.

As for a choice between #1 and #2, that really is a tough one.  Finances; mood at the moment; what I might be in the mood for (it could just be a night out at the movies for all I know); impressions from the pictures and text - I'm sorry, man, but there are just way too many factors to consider to make a call here.

Did you have anyone in particular in mind?

I' not a guy ( I have no reviews), but when I choose
to see someone, that's all completely based on intuition. If the person's emphases are on mechanical aspects of possible appointment, I will see him, but I almost completely sure, our meeting won't be memorable to me. I like adventurous people.

Nikolina.

There is a lady here who has 500+ reviews.  I was talking with a friend who, for that reason alone, wouldn't book with her.  So I was wondering if that would be the consensus opinion.

My take is that 500 reviews that average 7-8 means that she's not pretty enough for me.  The girl with no reviews isn't even an option.  So, I'd have to find someone with 9-10 in looks consistently, decent performance scores.  If I HAD to pick, I'd go with #1 but I'd go in with low expectations.

I'm a relative newbie so I'll go with the surer thing for sure.  I'll save the riskier stuff for when I'm a more experienced hobbyist.

Who wants to be called the mcdonalds of escorts ?

How about walmart of escorts instead ?

xo Lisa Butler

I'd go for provider #1 but she would not be of the cheap and greasy quality of Micky D's.

Walmart - McDonald's, what's the difference? They both cater to the same socio-economic group.

Experience over beauty for me because she know what she is doing and the rookie is unknown terrority to me.

Well if this isn't classic damned if you do damned if you don't conundrum, I don't know what is. A lady with no referrences is haram, taboo.....but God help us if we have too many reviews too. We get relegated to "the McDonald's" section.

And you guys wonder where the Kathy of 48th Streets come from.

I need a new alias.

Sarcasm is lost on you.

... but I decided to stay on topic.

Is that a geographic term for a street walker?

I probably don't do either one. I'm not really interested in the "churn" types that would amass that many reviews and the other is probably a scammer unless I have some other reason to accept the risk with no reviews (such as a UTR with recommendations).