So I have a review that is Unapproved.  Basically, I said that the lady in question had lots of stretch marks around her middle like she had recently had a kid.  The review was summarily rejected with the reason 'Your review discusses children. Reviews on TER should not make mention of children.'

OK, I can understand the reasoning behind that.  Any mention of the word kid probably triggers this response, so I edited it to say something funny without using any child related words directly like 'I'd say she had recently spent 9 months brewing to earn those marks'.  This was rejected to.

Am I asking too much here?  am I not allowed to fully review this girl, or, must I just not mention the stretch marks? which I think would be a disservice to the next guy since they were distractingly noticeable.

well just change your verbage to not include kids and talk simply about how there were a lot of stretch marks.

Just say she had a lot of stretch marks and leave it at that.  The fact is you don't know how she got them (she could have simply lost a lot of weight) Any speculation as to where they came from is completely unnecessary and has no effect on the honesty of the review. In fact, NOT speculating makes the review more honest.

"Just the facts, ma'am" Well the same holds true for TER. It's there sandbox, they make the rules.
BG57's post was right on the mark.

1. Kids are neither hobbyists nor providers. They are not participants and ought not be mentioned in a review any more than the next door neighbor.

2. Letting someone know that a lady has kids (assuming she told you that) could make her subject to all manner of blackmail, nastiness and manipulation.

It could be the final piece of a jigsaw puzzle that allows an ex-husband to make her life SUCK for no good reason. Also, she may be married and her hubby doesn't even know what she does for work. (Yes, it happens.) Again -- could be the clue to let hubby catch on.

She respects your privacy, you gotta respect hers.

3. Not tryin' to be too funny here; but mention of kids is not exactly compatible with fucking for fun and profit. It is certainly something that can happen; but what with STD concerns and all that already -- giving people such reminders within a review might not be conducive to the activity.

Look for crissakes. We talk about girl's physical characteristics in those reviews and that's what we look for. Pussy shaved? Tattoos? Boobs, etc. Just say she has stretch marks and let it go at that.

Sometimes ya gotta go for the most simple or direct metaphor.

She had more stripes across her ass & down her thighs than a heard of zebras.

If you are going to offend people, no point in only going halfway.

Some people are sooo fucking sensitive.lmao

Why not say, she has stretch marks, and leave it at that? Men get stretch marks on their bellies but they don't bare children. My best friend got stretch maks from gaining a lot of weight then she lost it and they are there. She has no children. Don't assume or bring up children. It's very uncomfortable to read. "The lady has stretch marks" or something like that is good enough.

Actually, you don't.

Some comments are just unnecessarily rude and unkind.

I love stretch marks. They're such an awesome physical reminder of how we all got here.

Go figure, huh?

get used to posts like that...or you'll never go outside and probably develop body dysmorphia...
And remember in reviews the guys say whatever they feel necessary in order to help other hobbyists whether it's mean, true or both. Thick skin is very helpful on here.

I have scars all up and down my body and head.

Fights, car accidents, jumping out of moving cars. No gunshots or puncture wounds from knives.

Yet.  

Providers might've seen these and thought 'WTF?!'

But at least they are lady enough to keep it to themselves. During the session, and on the boards.

WTF do I know, though....

OPs review comments were self-serving. It doesn't help me as a fellow hobbiest to hear speculation or assclown remarks about the provider, even if they are clever or entertaining.
No mangina here. Just sayin'.

WTF does the cause of the stretch makes have to do with the review?

Her appearance (the stretch marks) and her performance are legitimate and fair game. But making assumptions about where her stretch marks came from is just dumb!

If it din't fly the first time, why-oh-why keep trying to run it up the flag pole? The response from TER was clear:
 'Reviews on TER should not make mention of children.'

So why do you try to re-state the same assumption, and then ask us to explain things to you?

has any place in a review (unless she has them in the bedroom during the date, and they are screaming in the playpen!)  Mentioning the stretch marks is ok, if she has a lot of pics without them.  I saw a lady who had recently had a kid.  She looked good, had a little more baby weight to lose, but she was a great lady.  I did mention it in the review,(as had 3 reviewers before me), but also mentioned that it in no way detracted from her attitude, performance, and for the most part, looks.
Had she had a few big scars from a knife fight, or a couple healed bullet holes, I would have written more about it!

So is the discarded placenta on the delivery table. Does that give you wood also?

I rarely post on these boards but I think some of these responses are very offensive.

Sometimes those stretchmarks aren't due to recent childbirth but down to other things.

I do have some stretchmarks as I have had children but that was over 7 years ago.

However I recently lost 32lbs so they are more prominent now due to weight loss.

The below link shows stretchmarks!
Click at own risk.

-- Modified on 5/5/2010 12:12:11 PM

Point taken, but I've seen them before.  Those are most definitely kid stretch marks.  It's not so much of an assumption as an educated observation.

Perhaps my wording was a little harsh, but, the entire date was bad.  In context, you wouldn't have even given the comment a second thought.

That said, I'm just going to repost and say she has stretch marks and leave it at that.

LOTS of women put on weight fast and get them
They may have stretch marks from a child 10 years ago..

I TOTALY agree with TER turning it down by what you mentioned.