Atmosphere

Session Location

These two fill-it-in questions are part of posting a review here. They are both (as are many) open to reviewers' discretion as to how to answer them.  Personally, I see them as being similar in that the answers can either make or break my perception of the session, but do not always reflect negatively on the provider herself If there's something negative about it in my review.  

For instance, the woman might set a very pleasant atmosphere (positive words in my review), or she might be frigid, distracted, too money-focused, a clock-watcher, etc. The location could be great, or it could be a dump with foul odors from outside her room or the loud noises of a construction site blasting through. For the latter, a great time with a woman could possibly and completely take my mind off those negative influences.  Either way, I try to call it just like I see it so that others who read my reviews know what to expect as they make a decision to book or not to book, or to meet the provider at a different location.

Another thing about location is specificity. Some put the city, the type of building, the actual name of a hotel or motel, different things.  I usually name the actual motel or hotel if that's where I saw her, but I'm beginning to rethink that and I'm the future I may go more generic.

Those of you who write reviews, how do you usually respond to answering Atmosphere and Location?

Those of you who read reviews, how much stock do you put in what's written in Atmosphere and Location?

In today's climate or any other time in what fucking world would you actually name the City and the Hotel in which you visited a Provider, seriously.  Why don't you just provide the room number she was staying in too....did you stop and think think that she may use tht location again and how that might affect her safety, the safety of others and yourself if you were ever to return visit.   It is a damn shame that TER doesn't  have a pre-review common sense test and you may. wonder why some wish no reviews.  Per chance are you one who worries about disclosure of screening info or refuse to provide it due to the change of an outing?  Rethink it hell, how could you have ever thought it?

Suzee the slut

END OF MESSAGE

anything other than "incall" or "my hotel", but I would never name the hotel.  If it was a dive, I would mention it in the general details, again with no name. I would say something like, "the hotel was low-end or in a bad part of town" but I agree with hot momma, the actual name of the hotel should never appear in a review or a post.  Hopefully, one of these qualifiers would be enough to 1) give other mongers pause about going if they don't usually go to areas like that, or 2) give the provider notice that she should move her incall to a better area of the city or a better property.  

... such as southwest metro.  This gives everyone enough info to estimate within about 15 minutes the drive time to get there.  

I would only put a city location down if the provider in question advertised online.  On TER, P411, or some of the others.  If it is online, it is public.

If I am traveling, I will list the providers publicly listed city of origin, again using TER and P411 posts as a I guide,

I cannot imagine a good reason to ever, ever list a hotel location for either incall, or outcall.  Dumb, dumb, dumb.