If she's doing BBFS with customers I wouldn't see her unless she shows proof of power washing.

Dried Snail tracks on her breasts are bad enough.

It would be nice to know if the girl offers BBFS or only CFS, and being able to search for it using the criterion. I am all for it. But its not a deal killer if its not. As a matter of principle, I WILL NOT have BBFS with a provider, and that's what matters. Plain and Simple.

those drop downs embellish the truth on what a provider offers sometimes.  Drop downs are what the first reviewer puts down, and I have found them to be inaccurate at times.

such as how accurate the pics are, body size, height, AGE!, etc.

I've seen some drop downs where it shows bbbj til cim. But the provider does not that. Or she'll only do bbbj for an extra fee, or if she's doing an over night session. Also those dropdowns can get out of date quickly. What a provider is offering today, she may night offer six months from now.

I have yet to see an announcement of such. I have seen an announcement of gathering ideas and comments but I have yet to see say its now a full on policy.

I have emailed them twice now with that specific question and have yet to get a reply. Mods have you been informed it is now a go and that the policy is that BBFS is allowed in both reviews and discussion? Many of us are waiting to see what the policy is to determine our course of action.

As far as I know, no decision regarding the implementation of guidelines for BBFS discussion/inclusion in reviews or ads has been announced.  I assume TER ownership is debating how to do this based on the input of members.

discussing it and there are already reviews posted with BBFS in them. That's the way things seem to work around here. If it's OK, your post doesn't get pulled and your review stays up. By allowing all of these BBFS discussion posts to remain, the decision has implicitly been made. Same conclusion with the BBFS reviews which were approved. I doubt we'll see a formal announcement giving the green light but hopefully at some point, guidelines will be posted. Don't hold your breath waiting for them...

Can you direct me to a review that has BBFS in it? I keep hearing this and I cant find one. I heard of a person who claims to have seen it in an Alias post only later to come back and say it was edited after he saw it.

There are any of us that would like to see these reviews of BBFS and yet cant find them. Perhaps we are just not searching correctly. Sine the board is fine with discussing it I don't think it would be an issue for you to post a link to it. If not just PM the link to me and I will post it.

And thank you for being man enough to not post behind an Alias. I mean that and am not being a smart ass.

Yep, that seems to be the way it is. There is no announcement of something new. It simply happens and someone notices and spreads the word. I took that the discussions being allowed and the poll question posed meant that it's a go. Though I have looked for an official pronouncement of what exactly is acceptable I don't really expect to ever see one. If someone posts a link to a BBFS review I'll check it out. I'm not going to go in search of one.

I'm just guessing here, but it seems like the uproar may a delay in any proclamation.  In the meantime, we'll beat the issue to death.  I'm personally ready to build a sperm proof bunker out in the desert, but I'm too busy dealing with more discussion of the same topic to get the shovel out of the garage.

We wouldn't want you to get pregnant.

As many of you know I can be outspoken, and blunt. However I have always been fair and forthcoming.

The following link was sent to me this morning. It is as disgusting as can be in my opinion. It is a TER posted and allowed Review of a TS that allowed BBFS.

The Review still stands as of this AM, and has stood for several months.

I would appreciate anyone else that comes across a Review that indicates BBFS to please let me know where it is.

Polish_Pirate...my apologies, you were it seems correct. The reviewer has an extensive review history. It looks to be legit to me.

-- Modified on 11/26/2011 8:44:21 AM

The next client that asks me for BBFS is getting the explanation that my vagina is a sperm-proof bunker. Thanks Phil!

I have one thing to say about that review, That is gross and disgusting.

Thanks for the info Reagan, but ewww, that was a disgusting read.

However after checking your link, I did read several more of his reviews, and it is possible he had bbfs with several TSs. While nowhere does it specify bbfs, a lot of them do not mention a cover, and say things like "I came inside her." Now, did he come inside her in a cover, or did he just come inside her? Some say things like "I pulled out and sprayed all over her ass." Now did he pull out, and take off a cover and spray all over her ass, or was it no cover? Who knows, unless someone specifically asks the reviewer. Now all the "hers" mentioned above are him/her. The same guy has many reviews with regular ladies. That makes this whole thing even scarier to me. BBFS with trannys, then sex with regular providers, that some of us who might not see trannys might visit.

It looks like I've given some provider a great alias idea.

But Reagan, you're outspoken and blunt? Nah...can't be

I wonder if the only BBFS reviews so far are TS? If so, I'll never read any because I'm about as homophobic as they come. No offense to you TS providers out there but not my cup of tea.

Either way, I find it highly hypocritical...

I am a hobbyist and do not deny it, but get real!!

Generally on this board we are either hobbyist or providers. Either was we participate in an activity that is on general terms really frowned upon and judged in a very negative light. As a general rule, pretty much everyone I have spoken to on this board agrees that it is between two consenting adults and is a private matter and really should not be illegal.

To then suddenly be so judgmental about two consenting adults and what they do in private I find to be highly hypocritical.

I am not sure what you base your misplaced judgement on, perhaps it is...

1) Risk factor? News flash, you participate in one of the most dangerous professions there is. You are in private chambers with men you no very little about, and yes, condoms are not 100% as well.

2) Accidental pregnancy? You do now know what means of protection the provider may be using.

Seeing as how you and I both participate in an activity that is high risk and illegal, I think we should really think hard before deciding that we are arbiters of of what two consenting adults choose to do together.
 

-- Modified on 11/27/2011 12:39:03 PM

That was my review you guys were discussing, go back and read all of my reviews and let me know if you can tell which ones i did BBFS with and which ones i covered up with.  I hav been seeeing working girls and TS's for many years and i get tested regularly and am clean.  I don't do SW and i am careful who i stick my raw dick into.  I am glad to see that TER finally woke up to the fact that BBFS is happening everyday all over the country and we need to be talking abut it openly.    And now i must get back to looking for my next sperm recipient.

Some guys prefer women that like to be fucked in the ass, others do not.
Some guys like women that will suck their cock, others do not.
Some guys like women that will fuck them bareback, others do not.
This is exactly what The Erotic Review is all about.