As a client...how do you feel about booking a girl you think is a new girl that is in your wheelhouse as far as looks, body type, session details, etc., only to find that she is a girl you already knew from another place?

Are you bummed?  Happy?

I know this is a general, more vague question, but just wondering, since it has happened to me on a few occasions.  Sometimes I was kinda bummed (meaning that the particular girl wasn't what I was in the mood for), and sometimes I'm jazzed.

But generally speaking, when booking a new girl, I wanna find a new girl.  Not a rebrand.

when girls change agencies for one reason or another. It happens with independent providers too, but I have seen that happen to a lesser extent. Sometimes they don't want their identity to get carried from Place A to Place B for one reason or another. Now, it doesn't happen only because of shitty economy. It can happen for variety of reasons like security reasons, bad reviews with old identity, too much drama on TER, legal reasons just to name a few....

For e.g. Two big agencies in DC area (DMV and Classy) got busted earlier this year. Some of the girls retired completely, while a subset moved on. Now, a smaller subset of those that moved on changed their identity and work under new name.  

If would be bummed too if I went in and realized that Tracy @ TheNewAgency is actually Stacy from DMV, but if I am already going in with the knowledge and I know beforehand that its OK.  

Its a small world we live in, so its bound to happen sooner or later if you hobby a lot..

-- Modified on 8/19/2012 8:26:55 AM

as long as i get the mileage..retreads run just as good as new ones..

Many providers have 2 personas...a really high end one, and a market based one. Perhaps on the West Coast she charges a grand and in the dirty south less than 400...marketing 101, but not smart to double dip or your cover is blown ha ha.

with that double persona approach, because if the cover gets blown, it can certainly backfire and hurt the girl in long run.

I am OK with girls charging more in certain markets, especially when they are traveling providers to offset their traveling expenses. Most hobbyists would appreciate a more honest approach saying..HEY..In certain markets I am going to charge more, because its expensive.  Having two persona just smells deception.

I'm talking about working at two different competing agencies in NYC.

You mean working at the same time? Why would anyone want to do that...What's the incentive?

Are they different type of agencies..Like FBSM/Private Viewing Vs Full Service?

This may be a regional thing, and if you're not from NYC, then maybe you don't know this or have not seen this.  I dunno.  But I have seen this happening for the last, say, 18 months here.

We don't have private viewing agencies.  We have FBSM agencies, and we have escort agencies here.  There just simply are too many girls trying to get work and who used to be a lot more busy that just aren't getting the bookings, so they work for multiple agencies under different names.

It's not like every girl is doing this, but there are probably at least a dozen examples out there.

And if you then add the multiple ads on BP...they may appear to be working as an Indy as well.

And the prices should be noted...they tend to vary from agency to agency as well as their "so called Indy ads".

I certainly haven't seen this in the DC area. If someone has then a fellow DC monger can correct me, but the only instances I have seen it played out are the ones being outlined in my earlier response.

From what you describe, it seems the logical explanation would be to tap into client base for individual agency, while not appearing desperate for business. Also, there seems to be an underlying assumption that clients of one agency are reluctant to tryout another agency..

I guess only the girls can tell if its working for them or not...

A girl is not getting enough business, and is trying another agency that might be more busy.  Or she just feels like when she is working one or two days a week, she needs to work five days a week, so she goes to agencies which will give her those other days.

Just saying that you are correct.  The assumption is that agency X has a different Rolodex than agency Y.

This has gotta be some of the worst punctuation and conjugation I have ever seen.  But lemme attempt to understand what I think you are trying to articulate.

First, I never said I only go "top notch."  See the link below, and I am referencing the post you are talking about.  You are talking about there being no white MPs.  You were talking bodyrub, as was I, in that thread.  I said there are plenty of places, but you dodged that question.  Now you are misquoting that post and using that to set up another failed argument.

Second, there are lots of hot girls to be found at agencies, as well as those who are independent.  Some girls really don't want to deal with the indie thing, and don't want to screen, and are happy to give up a cut to the agency.  Other girls don't want to deal with the challenges of having to do their own booking.  So there are all types.  To say that all girls who have brains and looks are gonna be indie is just a stupid and unqualified remark.

Third, look at Aphrodite Companions.  Is that a bad agency?  Do they have ugly girls?

Fourth, where did we start talking about rates?

I think there might be more, but frankly I can't understand your drivel.

Do you not know how to use periods, commas, and other forms of punctuation?

Top-notch brownstones?  So it has to be a brownstone?  I don't understand a thing you are trying to say.

Great.  I prefer to be anonymous.  I have no interest in meeting another client in real life.

Which is what prompted my thread and asking guys how they felt.

Beyond that I cannot understand what you are asking.

Notice there are no ">" in your post.  Got a problem with using conventional punctuation?

Well, not those markets, but that's for another topic.

I don't meet with other clients in public.

Thanks, though.