Hello all. What do you guys think of providers who do not allow reviews.
Edit: Thanks for the responses. I also searched Eros on this board and found some answers. I have noticed a ton of Eros providers have 0 reviews and was curious about how everyone felt.
-- Modified on 10/31/2022 9:09:14 AM
I don’t mind. I won’t go with an unreviewed provider, so it doesn’t impact me.
But that is rare and a specific situation. Usually it is because someone I trust has seen the woman in question and has told me privately she is exceptional. I do, on very rare occasions, see a lady blindly i.e. with no reviews and no recommendations by a friend, but in every case that would be a girl on many ad platforms and SM and who has shown kindness and professionalism over all of them.
Tbh, it seems that most women will allow reviews, it's just a question of which review site(s) she will allow them on.
Well, yes, tbh there is a guy I know here who could give me a private recommendation that I would act on. But, that’s really a back channel kind of TER review in a way.
There is only one gal I see who asks not to be reviewed (Though in fact, she does have several.)
She is a high minded tantrika gal who doesn't want to be associated with the hobby world in general, so I see her point.
I did ask her after our first session if she wanted a review, and she said no, so I respected that request, though I'm glad that others did not as it gave me a good impetus to see her. I'll admit that is a bit hypocritical, but such is life.
Too risky. Lots of choices out there......
For me, a no review policy tells me they are hiding something, most often it will be a spotty service history or that they are engaging in higher-risk services than what I'm okay with. As with Jack, the only way I would see a woman like this is if she had multiple back-channel recommendations from monger I know and trust. Otherwise, it's an automatic pass for me.
I wouldn't.
And that's just someone with zero ratings, not someone who actively (versus passively) chose to suppress ratings. If you actively chose to suppress reviews, what does this mean? For vast majority of sellers, having good reviews means more biz and more revenue. So why would they suppress something that is a good thing for them UNLESS there are some and reviews of her and she wants to hide them? Then it makes sense for her, but stops making any sense for mongers to see her.
buy something and then not pay them because they have no reviews? Lol
I meant, I would not buy a product that had no reviews. And I certainly would not buy - and very actively discourage others from buying - a product that the sellers suppressed reviews for on purpose.
Something tells me you knew exactly what I meant yet decided to cling to words.
There's fake agency reviews of their girls to gin up business. Additionally, girls will ask you to write a great reviews for them. Not all 9-10's are 9-10's. Both sides need to be verified. Most of the no review policy girls have been the $800+/hour girls.
The one exception to the "must have reviews" approach is for UTRs on p411 who don't have reviews (or very few). Any lady who goes thru the effort to get listed on p411 is likely legit. Sure, you might end up with a dud but you're more likely to find a gem (if you search carefully).
Her business, her choice.
Some see the benefits of reviews as a business generator. Others, as CDL noted, don’t like reviews because they have something to hide. Then there are those who just find the graphic play by play distasteful and a bit too transactional. I’ve had several amazing dates with providers in the latter category, and unfortunately with one who had something to hide.
However, they were on the specific recommendation of someone I trust (both lady and male). Quite frankly, I give more credence to something like that than a review.
I don’t see ladies without reviews, and I would never see a lady with a no review policy. Reviews are crucial to my safety and security when hobbying.
Seeing a provider with no reviews, is like a provider seeing a client with no references. I need a general idea of what I'm walking into.
And just like someone else alluded to, you'd be a complete idiot spending hundred and hundreds of your hard earned dollars on any service, without said service being reviewed by other's first. The very same providers who don't want reviews will then turn around and look for reviews on services that they want to spend their money on, but want us to take a gamble...
but they do indicate services and quality you might expect for the price you are paying.
I believe that many, many providers are scaling back services and quality under cover of "no review" policies. The shill reviews on the site the providers love to point out are of course not detailed as to quality or services.
Reviews show consistent service or lack there of. That's what I look for when reading a provider's reviews.
Whenever a provider (with a lot of great consistent reviews) implements a "no review" policy, it really makes me now question if their service will become inconsistent to the point of it being noticeable in reviews if they'd have continued to allow them. This would apply to a noticeable decline in appearance too.
I do not put any stock into the reviews on the site that you're referring to. I doubt that they would even allow an honest, not-so-good review. The reviews on there read like testimonials you'd find on a provider's website.
I would easily pay more or seal the deal with a well reviewed provider. P-411 adds value also. No reviews 95 % of the time means you are going to regret seeing said provider.
One of the MAJOR reasons that I’ll only see providers with reviews is that I want to see what services they offer. In fact, this is just as important, if not more, than high review scores. I’ve seen plenty of 8/8 gals that I’ve been more than happy with - but I only saw them because I knew what was offered beforehand.
IMHO, a lot providers get too sensitive about their review scores. Nothing wrong with eights or nines at all. I could care less about 10/10s because they’re either ridiculously overpriced or their ratings are artificially inflated.
Granted, some providers don’t like the graphic details of their sessions displayed for the world to see, I get it. But, I also believe that the majority of providers that know about TER and don’t want to be reviewed are either reluctant to be held accountable and /or have succumbed to the culture of the legions of providers that delisted from TER several years ago.
What makes you only go for woman who have reviews. Do all of you hobbyists just sit around jerking off to Providers who have a great review. LMFAO. There are hobbyist who do not want to place review and what makes the so-called-reviews do to make your dick stand at an attention. Do you (The Hobbyist) have to get yourselves off with what other guy do to the Provider that you want?!
You need to get back on your meds.
Keep your future wife in line?
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/ter-general-board-12/re-whos-that--1000340?page=
Or are you two now married?
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/ter-general-board-12/re-oh-lol-when-is-the-wedding-eom-1000355?page=
2023 = 28
To be that cranky you must be using those steel wool tampons again.
So OF COURSE most of us go for women who have reviews. Duh.
Which leads to the question: If you're against reviews, what the fuck are you doing here? I mean besides making a fool of yourself every time you post.
A review (assuming it's a positive one) is a vote of confidence, along with its intrinsic value as a public evaluation of service and/or product.
I'd ask why would one ever go to someone with no reviews (word of mouth via private channels is also a review just with no public visibility)?
Just like I don't see why I would go to a restaurant with no yelp reviews if all the alternatives all some?
The risk to reward ratio is too high.
I can understand completely why you would not want to be reviewed
This is pretty straight forward
If a provider is, well, good, her reviews will be good, barring the occasional nut-case. If a provider is bad, and she knows it, she may have a "no review" policy which, BTW, is not enforceable. These, in fact, rely on the honesty of the guy who just lost money on a bad session! To be fair: I met one provider who was great and had a no-review policy. A loser had burned her in the past, so she asked for no-reviews going forward,
Good providers will frequently ask for reviews.
I saw a $$$$ provider who had a no-review policy. To say she was non-GFE would be too kind! It was the most hands-off experience I've ever had, directed by a primadonna, who enjoyed being a ball-breaker. I completely understand why she had a "no review" policy!
Providers with zero reviews, IMHO, have not inspired anyone to write one, good or bad. They may also be very new to the game.
Having solved this mystery, I will no retire for the evening!
Unless they've changed their policy, a public no review policy here is grounds for de-listing.
If that's changed, someone should let us know.
Interesting post. I’ve seen lots of high profile ladies on Teitt3r saying they’re a no review provider and many have lots of followers on there I mean thousands of followers. They say it doesn’t impact their business.
It would be weird for them to say it does impact business, because that would mean they willingly lose $
I'd expect all providers who employ no review policy to SAY that it doesn't affect their biz, no matter the actual truth value of that statement.
Oh well of course they won’t admit that!
most providers I see dont want me to post reviews, so I only post if its very negative time, cash and dash etc. etc and on other sites where a sentence is suffice. when I started I thought could use them as references, but it seem no one care.