TER General Board

the worst?
romeogolf 34 Reviews 462 reads
posted
1 / 49

the two targets are but an inch away from one another. Geesh !

But to answer your question:

First, I would expect her to make a yelping sound.

Secondly, I would expect her to change the cover and guide me into the correct entrance like the beginner that I am.

Or.......

Possibly it would all be Okay with her and all she would do is say to me....

" Your gonna owe me more money for that ".

shudaknownbetter 461 reads
posted
2 / 49

As a client, my ladies always guide me into the correct location at the correct angle.  
Once as s teen I might have gotten against the wrong portal...  there was no chance of entry.  So if a client were to accidentally get against in the wrong place, I'd think he could not easily enter without force (correct me if I'm wrong)...  you don't let him in, SAY something!  Change cover & start over.  
If the client is trying to do something without permission, that is rape.  
skb

terczar 12 Reviews 682 reads
posted
3 / 49

Rape means forced sexual intercourse. Sodomize is the correct term for anal sex regardless whether or not the act was consensual. The law does distinguish between them and you will often hear the term "Raped and Sodomized" in the legal circle

DirtyDaego 11 Reviews 573 reads
posted
4 / 49

Tell you what....I'll bend you over and shove my cock in your un-lubed ass when you aren't expecting it....and we'll see what you call it then.

No. Wait. That won't work at all.
You'd just wind up calling me at all hours of the day and night...sending flowers...standing outside my house holding a boombox over your head....

mattradd 40 Reviews 300 reads
posted
5 / 49

And, sex intercourse is not limited to vaginal sex.

P.S. A woman can be charged with raping a man! The sodomy is just a descriptor.

lol_said_the_provider 211 reads
posted
6 / 49
lol_said_the_provider 321 reads
posted
7 / 49

Posters here are getting douche-ier by the minute.

DirtyDaego 11 Reviews 256 reads
posted
8 / 49

You will notice that I followed the rules for a change and said it was a dumbass post...and not that the poster was directly a dumbass. ;)

Perhaps it's only a "matter of opinion" depending on who's ass get's penetrated unwillingly.
And no one mentioned the po-po except you. It's not a legal matter....it's a boundary matter.

Hopefully a provider will see this and ram a vibrator up your ass sometime. Then you can limp to your car reminding yourself that it was simply a "misunderstanding between consenting adults".

Dumbass.................post.

shudaknownbetter 167 reads
posted
9 / 49

the back door that is.  Even a lady who does allow this by arrangement would in all likelyhood not do so without prior permission & preperation.    

But the OP STATED ENTERED WITHOUT PERMISSION.  This is not a case of lost his way as I contemplated previously, the question states  completed entry.  The OP's question is vague but the preface in clear.  The client may ask.  But never enter without permission.  I'd expect him to be blacklisted.
skb

IfintheRW 1253 reads
posted
11 / 49
HaleyOrlando See my TER Reviews 642 reads
posted
12 / 49

I don't know if your a provider or hobbiest so please tell us

Kisses Haley

lilli 221 reads
posted
13 / 49


the question makes no sense. you should have asked what is the BEST thing we would do...and the best thing i would do in such a situation would be to immediately call my Husband. then that particular client would find his frontal lobe "accidentally" penetrated by my Hubby's shoe...over and over and over again. oopsie! just one of those misunderstandings between consenting adults. :)


mjp1966 15 Reviews 122 reads
posted
14 / 49

Finally, someone here who possesses an ounce of reason. Nothing in the OP's post suggested he wanted to do anything like this. He asked a question. That's it. Is everyone here so goddamned thin-skinned and trigger-happy that they instantly assume any question posted here is based on some unspoken, devious intent?

pleasureglans 17 Reviews 384 reads
posted
15 / 49

No, it's not "plain and simple." Sex was consensual, it's a matter of opinion if the backdoor was non-consensual and therefore "rape," which is legally termed "sexual assault." (non-consensual penetration of a body cavity). I seriously doubt the cops would file charges once they knew all the circumstances and in the meantime, the provider gets a referral to the vice unit.

Yeah, I'm sure it would be unpleasent and I'm not defending the client, but it ain't rape, sweety. It's an accident or a misunderstanding between consenting adults.

Posted By: HaleyOrlando
I don't know if your a provider or hobbiest so please tell us

Kisses Haley
-- Modified on 1/14/2011 5:26:39 PM

-- Modified on 1/14/2011 7:41:13 PM

Harley0569 5 Reviews 252 reads
posted
16 / 49

Plane and simple. You know she's not going to tell on you. (le). You mean to tell me you had no intentions on going there? And oopsie?!  That's bullshit! If it were me, you'd be a piece of shit in my book. I apologize if I over reacted.

mistressjessica 262 reads
posted
17 / 49

And you and she both know it. If you do that and she says NO. Yes, it is rape or Sodemy. However you want to label it. You are wrong to even try it.

What would I do. First. Turn around and tell you to get out.  
Second black list you and  tell everyone I and you know about it Including the cops.
If I am lucky and quick enough you might find yourself with a tazer stuck in your  dumb ass!

Consent in one thing. That is crossing the line.

This makes me wonder why do you ask?

CaitlynKennedy See my TER Reviews 243 reads
posted
18 / 49

well if her surprised me, I might accidentally kick and that kick might go to a nether region which would make him in pain for a long time!


I might not mean to but I may do it out  of shock and surprise

I think that would be the WORST thing I could do

EstellaAyrs See my TER Reviews 234 reads
posted
19 / 49

I seriously hope that by asking this and phrasing it as whats the WORST thing a provider would do, you're not planning on having you're own uninvited "accident". Maybe preparing yourself for possible outcomes? I don't mean to offend anyone with my cynicism on this but I find it a poor way to phrase the question if I'm on the wrong track.
Doing anything you know is uninvited and something that is clearly across the line, like going greek when a woman doesn't, would warrant a much worse reaction from me than a punch based on principal alone. I would never disrespect someone like doing something I knew they were not comfortable with. Sorry but putting your dick in someones ass is no accident even during the most passionate of endeavors.

Posted By: IfintheRW
What is the worst thing you would do?

impposter 49 Reviews 183 reads
posted
20 / 49

I think the ONLY way to settle the disagreement over the details and the law regarding the OP's question is to wait for an episode of Law and Order: SVU to have the OP's scenario as the main plot.

And when Munch matter of factly tells Benson and Stabler that there's even a website where guys go to read profiles and write reviews that about 500,000 L&O viewers will find and overload the TER servers within an hour or two.

Hay ... when you don't want to pay a real lawyer, a free TV lawyer will have to do.

DirtyDaego 11 Reviews 211 reads
posted
21 / 49

right before you feel two hands on your shoulders...a little pressure down below...and weep with joy.

HDDOC96 13 Reviews 178 reads
posted
22 / 49

It doesn't matter paid or not, it becomes rape if you persist.   The worst thing that could happen in my opinion is her castrating your ass.  If she say no and you continue you could end up with earned rape charge.  Now if it was really an accident you should have stopped.
Doc

MP67 11 Reviews 360 reads
posted
23 / 49

Good luck with that, BTW. Bending me over and pushing my shit in.

MP67 11 Reviews 123 reads
posted
24 / 49
MP67 11 Reviews 197 reads
posted
25 / 49

I wouldn't do anything to a lady she didn't give me consent to. But, if shit happened, like Romeo said, in the moment, and she didn't object, WTF? I certainly wouldn't push it, no pun intended, but shit happens. Again, no pun intended.

Hirogen 122 reads
posted
26 / 49

The OP is a hooker.

OOPS! Flip my alias. I said the "H" word, lol.

GaGambler 110 reads
posted
27 / 49

"If" any one had been outed on this board the post would have been pulled and the poster moderated, but nothing of the kind happened "on this board"

I can't read the mind of the OP, and until he does something that actually breaks the rules, the "thought police" have no power here.

MP67 11 Reviews 195 reads
posted
28 / 49

Oh yeah. This is gonna be fun. Been a long time, and I am so due.

WebTerrorist 169 reads
posted
29 / 49

it isn't an accident or misunderstanding?

What if the client knew for a fact that was not allowed and did it anyway?
Would that still be as innocent?

What if the client asked about anal, and was flatly told no, but once in the dogie position rammed his dick in her ass?

Would it be an opinion if it were rape or not?

What you are arguing is "Date Rape" logic...
if she let me do "A" then I can do "B", even if she told me I couldn't.


WebTerrorist 165 reads
posted
30 / 49

So, the OP is a client wanting to anally rape a lady and just wanting to know how much trouble he will be in for doing it?

The question:
"What is the worst thing you would do?  (if a client anally raped you)...
really has the feel of wanting to know what possible ramifications he might face if he does so...
which implies he wants to do so.

Now, if I were a lady in this business and a client anally raped me, the first thing I would do after getting him the fuck off of me, would be to grab his dick in one hand and his balls in the other, squeeze as hard as possible, whilst puling and twisting each in opposite directions until at the very least I ruptured one or both of his testicles and and tore the tendon that connects his dick to his body...
but that's me.

At that point there is a very good chance he would call 911 himself for an ambulance, but if he didn't I'd call the cops...
Prostitution = misdemeanor
rape = felony
guess who wins...or loses as the case may be?

Dumbjock 2 Reviews 136 reads
posted
31 / 49

The P4P model is based on the premise that CONSENTING adults should have free choice to do as they wish with their bodies and time.  If we remove the "consenting" part of the argument then we render it moot.  

It is in the best interest of the board that we discourage any suggestion that our "hobby" incorporates even a suggestion of violence against women (or men).  Engaging in non-consensual acts is the behavior of a predator and not a hobbyist.   This should not be allowed to trend here.  

When a website community allows itself to be populated, and therefore defined, by the worst of society it is inviting outside scrutiny (Read: Craigslist is a cautionary tale).  

I wouldn't want to be associated with any person or website that would tolerate such thought.

Dumbjock

Fair_Use 29 Reviews 196 reads
posted
32 / 49

Is that wrong?  I hope not, because I steal a few tastes every time!

little phil 37 Reviews 174 reads
posted
33 / 49

First of all, nobody here has been raped.  The OP asked a question and nothing more.  Besides, there is no alias to flip, unless you're suggesting that we out him/her to their family and neighbors.  I'm strongly in favor of consensual sex between two or more adults.  There is no hard evidence that the OP did anything outside those bounds.

impposter 49 Reviews 155 reads
posted
34 / 49

There were some recent threads that "outed" some reviewers that described not just pushing the boundaries but breaking them: "I don't know if that was on the menu but it is now." kind of stuff. The intent of the OP of those threads was to alert providers to the possible situations and the specific guys who might try to pull those tricks. I think the threads were pulled because they mentioned (outed) specific reviewers.

Cynamon See my TER Reviews 301 reads
posted
35 / 49

I have had this happen once and it really was purely accidental. It wasn't with a client, however, it was with a boyfriend. He had DATY and I was exceptionally wet and we had sex missionary and were going so fast that he accidentally slipped in the other hole. He stopped immediately and I can tell he didn't do it on purpose.

However, that didn't stop it from hurting. I know some guys are into it, but it's very painful, at least it was to me. He only got in there once but I was sore for days, much worse than losing my virginity.

I guess it would depend on the circumstances. It could really be a mistake. But I guess that's assuming that the client didn't mention that he wanted greek from the beginning. I guess your only option is to try to gauge his reaction to see if he really meant to or not.

pleasureglans 17 Reviews 140 reads
posted
36 / 49

For those of you with reading comprehension problems....:

I wasn't in any way defending what happened here or suggesting it was OK. I was simply pointing out it was not quite as "plain and simple" as some seem to think. For the men with dildos.....well, have fun continuing to use them on yourselves. I don't do anal, giving or receiving.

Thanks for the kind offer, however....lol

hotplants 173 reads
posted
37 / 49


When asking a question like this one would think that any anyone who was not entertaining some level of intention of actually doing this, would clearly state that he is only asking a hypothetical, and would never under any circumstances consider doing this himself.

And you use the word “uninvited”. Not unintentionally, or accidentally….You may as well go ahead and ask what's the worst thing a provider would do if you forcibly sodomized her?

But who knows what’s in your head? Assuming you really mean “uninvited; which more than implies you clearly KNOW this is not welcome? What would a provider do?

Well, I don’t know what anyone else would do. But I would kick you in the nads violently enough to create a lasting lifelong memory…more than once if I could get the shot in. With any luck I would still have my 6 inch stilettos on. And, that’s assuming you immediately stopped when I told you to.

If you persisted after I told you to stop? As soon as I could get your ass off of me, I would kick you in the nads. Then I would call the police because, make no mistake about it that would be rape.

And, either way, if I was a provider I would do everything possible to make sure other providers knew about you, and what you did.

Fair_Use 29 Reviews 102 reads
posted
38 / 49

Its the thought that counts.  And I likes the way you think!

WebTerrorist 103 reads
posted
39 / 49

No, I don't assume everything is based on some devious intent...
but I do believe words have meaning, the choices of words has meaning and the tone has meaning...

Yes, the OP asked a question...
let's look at that question, shall we?
"What is the worst thing you would do? "

Not simply what would you do, but what is "THE WORST" thing you would do...
why the qualifier?
why the worst thing?

You would say simply a question, fine, you say it unreasonable to think anything else...to your reasoning.
To my reasoning the inquiry as to "the worst thing" is to gauge risk vs benefit...
How much might one lose if they do so...
not simply will they lose something, not simply will they lose...
but specifically what is the most they would lose...
How bad would the punishment be, not just would there be punishment...

Simple curiosity asks "what would you do?"
something more insidious asks "what's the worst you would do?"


Now, let's look at the title of the thread...
"Providers if a client enters the backdoor uninvited"

Nice euphemism.
Doesn't ask "if a client ass rapes you"
or "if a client does Greek without consent"

It minimises the act.
It sanitises and plays down the severity of the act.

So, the OP just asked a question in two sentences...
and with those two sentences minimises the act, while gauging  how severe any punishment will be....
but nah...no reason for folks to think it anything more than your opinion that it was just an innocent question.  



mjp1966 15 Reviews 89 reads
posted
40 / 49

Posted By: WebTerrorist
No, I don't assume everything is based on some devious intent...
By over-analyzing the OP's question, that's EXACTLY what you and everyone else are doing. You're delusional if you think otherwise.
Posted By: WebTerrorist
but nah...no reason for folks to think it anything more than your opinion that it was just an innocent question.
You're goddamn right it does. There is NO reason to think that until proven otherwise. But, according to your logic, the guy is guilty until proven innocent, right? Fuck that. Thankfully, you aren't a moderator here, because this forum needs people who are more level-headed.

WebTerrorist 111 reads
posted
41 / 49

Moderators approve posts, moderate accounts, and can remove posts...
don't know what else you think they do.

So, the level headed moderators did nothing...
which is exactly what I would do.

I think his post should stand as is.
So, they left it alone with his username intact...

I would have done the same thing.

Guilty of what?
No one called for Admins to find the accounts user info and call any authority...
no one called for the account to be banned....
No one called for him to be blacklisted...
no one asked for his head on a pike...
Those that mistakenly thought it an alias post called for the actual username to be posted....it already was.

So, proven otherwise is what...a report of a client with that username anally raping a lady?

Yeah tragic a lady might think twice before seeing the guy...
so much better the guy would have to anally rape a lady first....

I mean how cruel if he gets less than kind replies on a message board...poor guy how ever is he going to live with the shame?


Question...
if there were a lady you actually cared about her well being,
you notice the OP posted a ISO on your local board and that lady that you care about replies to it and it seems she may see him...
do you point her to this post, or do you figure he just asked a question and she has no reason for concern or to even know about his query?

Me, I would warn any lady I thought might see the guy, and link them to the original post in this thread...I guess you would do nothing and wait for it to be proven if there were any risk to her well being.

I do wonder what the moderators would do if it was their ATF or a lady they cared about that they thought might see the OP as a client?

little phil 37 Reviews 102 reads
posted
42 / 49

And you're right, I'd sure tell her about him.  I never said I thought he was a good guy, just that people were jumping to conclusions.  Put in the situation where a friend MIGHT be in jeopardy, I'd lean to the side of safety.  In the end, I'd leave it to her to decide.  Matter of fact, we had something like that happen recently, and I gave her my 2 cents worth, she thought it through, made her decision and it worked out fine.  But yeah, I was nervous until I heard from her.

Like I said, you know me... :)

inicky46 61 Reviews 85 reads
posted
43 / 49

Say...where the hell is scoed when we need him?

impposter 49 Reviews 99 reads
posted
44 / 49

Sorry 'bout that. I found the General board discussion (link below). I can't find the New York board discussion. I guess that one was pulled. Maybe there was something on the LV board, too.

At least two of the reviews mentioned have been deleted and when I search the reviewer, he exists but has no reviews at all. (I had PMed the detailed info to others which is how I "remembered" the names, TER IDs and so on. It was still in my email.)

Part of the NY board discussion was about whether or not the reviews should have been approved or not or allowed to remain or not. One line of opinion was that if a provider confirmed someone via TER PM and then read their reviews it would warn them about that guy's behavior, or potential behavior.

Now, it looks like the slate has been wiped clean for that guy and he basically has a "clean" TER handle.




-- Modified on 1/15/2011 4:02:42 PM

impposter 49 Reviews 65 reads
posted
45 / 49

Sorry, folks. I guess the link got deleted. It's on the General board, starting with subject line "I ran across a review that kind of ticked me off"  posted on 1/8/2011 at 3:11:37 PM.

Sage of Chicago See my TER Reviews 165 reads
posted
46 / 49

I would end my time with him right then and ask him to leave.  I would also make ladies aware via BC what he had done without asking first.

I enjoy backdoor fun, but NOT all the time.  I need to be properly prepared and ready for it to happen, for it to be enjoyable and not dangerous form of play.  

Not to get nasty or anything but do you know if you enter a back door that has not evacuated for the day you can push that matter back inside and it can even rupture the colon.  Due to the nature of the area if it is not taken care of quickly and cleanly medically(which is a shit load of $$$, much more then the measly fee for the date) there is a possibility it could go septic and maybe even cause death.

Guys, do you really want to be a party to something like that?  I mean really, you can tear her and hurt her and without lube it NEVER feels good even if one is prepared otherwise for it.

Guys THINK.  I know none of the blood is in your head, but for the love of god TRY to treat the woman you are with with as much respect as you want in return.  Big clue in, you will have a better session if you respect her because she will be more able to let loose and have a great time in return(thus you having a much better time because she truly enjoys and is not just playing along)...

nonymousanswer 86 reads
posted
48 / 49

No means no.  Just because you suck someone's dick doesn't mean you want to fuck, just because you fuck doesn't mean you want anal.  NOT date rape, RAPE.

abjc4 1 Reviews 119 reads
posted
49 / 49

It happened ONCE with my ex... TOTAL accident. I withdrew and never went there again. Only after my divorce did I find a woman that totally LOVES Greek and I found out how great it can be.

Register Now!