First is a copy of new reviews posted 7/7/02 and as you can see there is a review for Daniela between Lily and Bettina/Jessica/Jesstina  Next is a copy of today's (7/8)new reviews and you can see that there no review for Daniela on the 7th but there is now one for the 8th.


Modified Name Area Code City Location Incall/Outcall Services Offered
VIEW 7/7/2002 Summer 949 Orange County Outcall My PLace Outcall Escort/Massage/S&M
VIEW 7/7/2002 Amy 310 Los Angeles Brentwood Incall/Outcall Escort/Massage
VIEW 7/7/2002 Kyla 818 Los Angeles Sherman Oaks Incall Escort
VIEW 7/7/2002 Cumisha Amado 310 Los Angeles Marina del Rey hotel Incall Escort/Massage
VIEW 7/7/2002 Shayla 310 Los Angeles Marina Del Rey Incall Escort
VIEW 7/7/2002 Lily 310 Los Angeles 3rd & Highland Incall Escort/Massage
VIEW 7/7/2002 Daniela 323 Los Angeles Her Apartment Incall/Outcall Escort/Massage
VIEW 7/7/2002 Bettina/Jessica/Jesstina 310 Los Angeles Beverly Hills Adjacent/San Bernadino Incall/Outcall Massage
VIEW 7/7/2002 Nikita 310 Los Angeles Marina Del Rey Incall/Outcall Escort/Massage
VIEW 7/7/2002 Bell / Karina 818 Los Angeles Sherman Oaks Incall/Outcall Escort/Massage
VIEW 7/7/2002 Lene Hefner / Barbara 818 Los Angeles Sherman Oaks Incall Escort/Massage
VIEW 7/7/2002 Jasmin 323 Los Angeles apartment Incall/Outcall Escort
VIEW 7/7/2002 Annie 310 Los Angeles Her home Incall/Outcall Escort/Massage
VIEW 7/7/2002 Jacqueline 310 Los Angeles Los Angeles Incall/Outcall Escort
VIEW 7/7/2002 J 213 Los Angeles Koreatown Apt Incall Escort/Massage


Results 1 - 15 of 269

**********************************************************************************************************************************
VIEW 7/8/2002 Daniela 323 Los Angeles Her Apartment Incall/Outcall Escort/Massage
VIEW 7/8/2002 Krista 323 Los Angeles Universal City Incall/Outcall Escort/S&M

Go to Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

VIEW 7/8/2002 Laura/Veronika 310 Los Angeles my place Incall/Outcall Escort/Massage
VIEW 7/8/2002 May Ling 818 Los Angeles Woodland Hills Incall Massage
VIEW 7/7/2002 Summer 949 Orange County Outcall My PLace Outcall Escort/Massage/S&M
VIEW 7/7/2002 Amy 310 Los Angeles Brentwood Incall/Outcall Escort/Massage
VIEW 7/7/2002 Kyla 818 Los Angeles Sherman Oaks Incall Escort
VIEW 7/7/2002 Cumisha Amado 310 Los Angeles Marina del Rey hotel Incall Escort/Massage
VIEW 7/7/2002 Shayla 310 Los Angeles Marina Del Rey Incall Escort
VIEW 7/7/2002 Lily 310 Los Angeles 3rd & Highland Incall Escort/Massage
VIEW 7/7/2002 Bettina/Jessica/Jesstina 310 Los Angeles Beverly Hills Adjacent/San Bernadino Incall/Outcall Massage
VIEW 7/7/2002 Nikita 310 Los Angeles Marina Del Rey Incall/Outcall Escort/Massage
VIEW 7/7/2002 Bell / Karina 818 Los Angeles Sherman Oaks Incall/Outcall Escort/Massage
VIEW 7/7/2002 Lene Hefner / Barbara 818 Los Angeles Sherman Oaks Incall Escort/Massage
VIEW 7/7/2002 Jasmin 323 Los Angeles apartment Incall/Outcall Escort
VIEW 7/7/2002 Annie 310 Los Angeles Her home Incall/Outcall Escort/Massage
VIEW 7/7/2002 Jacqueline 310 Los Angeles Los Angeles Incall/Outcall Escort


Results 16 - 30 of 250

Go to Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17

Say guy -maybe they realized they posted so many new reviews on the 7th that they needed to save a few for the 8th?? Maybe its not a great conspiracy. Besides if she is the Daniela from citysource I hear she rocks.

If Daniela had new reviews on 7/7 and on 7/8, then her name moves from 7/7 on the list to 7/8.  Does that help?

If someone submits a problem report on the review, that will also move it to the next day.

http://theeroticreview.com/msgBoard/ViewMsgBody.asp?BoardID=12&Page=1&Messageid=24460

As I understand it, our Obsessive-Compulsive friend and colleague in vixensniffing is troubled by the changing dates and/or sequencing order on some reviews. Those I understand are the dates submitted, although the chess session may have transpired weeks or even 3 months earlier.
There is no suggestion that busy Staff has changed any details, so the sequence is utterly irrelevant to anything and essentially trivial, not worthy of our discussion.

From the standpoint of how the reviews might be used against a hobbyist or provider in the future, it may be a good idea to make a few mistakes as to date, time, place, etc. "Your honor, my client was not even in San Fran that week at all. Here are receipts for his plane tickets and phone logs showing he was actually in Belgium at the National Vixen Yodling Contest." The prosecution has him mixed up with some other Schmuck. Case dismissed.

So far as I can tell, reviews do not identify the date of the session, and often are intentionally vague to protect the innocent. Let's keep that in mind. These are fictional narratives for entertainment.

You seem to have gotten some flak for this post but I understand your beef. I enjoy the TER board so I'm not looking to complain, but revised reviews are not new reviews and should not be listed as such.

Fair enough if you think so, but revised is not new. I would suggest to TER to indicate all revised reviews as revised even if it shows up in the new section and even better to state what is revised.

to correct a simple, but significant, mistake, and my name did not move up the list to the date it was revised, even though it was a couple of days later.  So, probably nobody noticed the revision, as my name was then several pages back, and the damage of the mistake was done.  I think showing a review as revised and moving it to the top would be a good way to handle such situations.