Ok so I'm back on TER boards after taking a hiatus and maybe I don't recollect, but there seems to be a Sisterhood amongst providers. I'm all for togetherness and finding ways to agree with one another (especially when talking about something as pleasurable as hobbying). I'm finding some providers on the boards to be a little FAKE on occasion.

Some of you men think way too damn much about all of this. So much you never get to fuckin'.

I actually haven't noticed it.  On the otherhand I don't put much weight into female opinion.  It's all so tied to social standing that it more likely represents what they think they ought to say rather than what they actually believe.  This is where aliases here can really free them from social constraints.   But alas they still seldom shake off the lifelong shackles of social expectation.

You blew any credibility the moment you griped of our responses being "difficult to gauge", yet also claimed being able to know the true intentions and fears behind our posts in the same sentence. And here I thought selective telepathy was restricted to bad TV shows. Lol  Of course, self-contradiction is the least of your concerns, Wittgenstein.;

hates cliques.  You're the nerd that ends up with a wedgie.  You don't understand why, but you should just look at some of your posts, like this one:  "...I don't put much weight into female opinion."  Are you a time traveler from the middle ages?

second tier ladies go after the top ones who are taking all of the customers.  Its rather entertaining.  

-- Modified on 7/18/2016 10:01:35 PM

Well said!  Snarky but not hostile is ok.  You are correct that "not putting much weight into female opinion"  is an arsehole attitude.  
It of course is easy to say under an alias.  
Again, proof of my " two kinds of men"  theory.  
Those who hate women but love sex.  And those that loves women and love sex.  

two kinds of men.  Great way to put it!

I haven't noticed second tier ladies going after the top ones either.

It really seems to fit on boards like this.

Just because they don't agree with you doesn't mean they all agree all the time.

Hell, they can bring their girl friends along, I'm always up for a party.  

I don't have a problem with differences of opinion.

In certain matters (relationships, sexual marketplace) women have either been conditioned by society or inherently as part of their sexual strategy, to be circumspect in expressing their true feelings.  

I've seen many disagreements!

That's one of my main reasons for hanging out in this forum.  Whether the opinions of the "sisterhood" are in agreement or not is unimportant to me.  The responses from the ladies help me get into their minds a little, which not only helps my relationships with providers, but also helps my relationships with women in civie life.

I'm a smart man. Sure it's fun the have fun physically, but like if I take a provider outsider the bedroom she's gotta be more than just eye candy. Definitely attractive to know a woman can hold not only a normal conversation, but a conversation about controversial issues in a spirited fashion. I'm trying to consider that she has a mind of her own outside of popular belief. If they all group together,then where's the original thought.

Because he loves cat fights.

on this we agree

to see why you're not getting laid by civvie women.  Its our job to engage them and have a look under the hood to see what's real and what's not, but that takes a little "game" on the part of the man.  It sounds like you want a total stranger to walk up to you and express her undying love before you're willing to cut her any slack at all.  You make it sound like all women are schemers.  That's just narrow-minded and misogynistic.

Totally understand that you want visibility into the mind, characteristics and personality of ladies. My advice is look on twitter and read blogs. Especially if you are seeking a date that is longer and outside the room and want insight prior to introducing yourself. In my opinion, TER naturally limits this insight because its a melting-pot of personalities that tend to focus on hobby specific topics. Not much on controversial issues here unless its case specific (i.e. man posts about a disagreement or problem he has with a lady).

you " . . .don't put much weight into female opinion."  That's two different things, but nice try attempting to rehabilitate yourself.  Lol

I hated that movie!  
Feminist fiction just isn't my cup of tea.
There is a "Sisterhood of the travelling Pants II" now so someone likes it.

I don't think enough providers get that. Of course I enjoy the sex, but intimacy comes from how intriguing she is reallymore than anything else. You seem like the type Jordan. Most people I'm learning are poor at common social skills and use their computer screen to vent the sarcasm they cannot use in their everyday life. To say it in the most simplest way they are afraid to have their own point of view.

But can you afford a smart woman is the question. No smart woman wants to be patronized. A smart woman will read through your fake compliments in a second.  

If you limit yourself to finding ladies where only the "popular belief" allows her to be a part of the community, then that is what you're going to find. You've gotta have a good number of delegate votes here you know? Even if you gain the majority community vote, the delegates matter. Each post on sites like this translate to currency which makes it competitive and me personally - I don't have time for that.

DMC, I'm not sure how I'm giving the impression that I'm not actively hobbying. I can reply without being sensitive or having been offended. But yes, I am looking around for an ATF.