...The reviewer clicks the number of stars ( from 1 to 5 ) they feel represents the level of chemistry there was in the session. I don't know how that effects the number rating or if it does. I would think it doesn't.

For example, I just looked at all reviews since November 2016 for a provider who has scores in her profile for Chemistry and Incall. That means at least one review must have been submitted through the Beta site, which became available in limited use last December. But none of those reviews show anything about Chemistry or Incall.  

Of course it will no longer be "beta" at that time. It will be "theeroticreview"

without licking is never good.  

Of course you will only see it if you are in beta also.  

But it does affect the top 100. There are some positions in the top lists that are out of place based on basic arithmetic (higher than they should be solely based on numbers) but those have chemistry scores.

-- Modified on 4/2/2017 9:06:25 PM

And that Send PM that moves down the page is redic looking and distracting. That just one example.

On our Mn top top 100 list in the top 25 are providers with Beta reviews and in some cases the average now listed for placement is actually outside of the average of the two traditional scores for performance and looks.
Until one realizes how it is working it has nothing on  "hooker Math"

Right.  But what I was wondering about wasn't Chemistry and Incall showing up in profiles (in Beta of course), as I'd already seen that happening, but that the Chemistry and Incall scores don't show up in reviews. The profile you posted does provide an example of that... note there's no Chemistry or Incall scores in any review that could have been created using the Beta system.

but yes, I understand your meaning, and while I most definitely do NOT like the new discussion board layout, I am quite fine with the new review format. I am of course not a fan of the new review guidelines but the format is fine.

...I said it didn't know how it effects the rating. Specifically I was referring to the numbers a reviewer gives. Then I said I didn't "think" it did. That was speculation. I had not and still have not looked at Top 100 lists to consider anything beyond what I said. I take your word and perfectstorm's word that it apparently has effected the Top list.

I said it doesn't affect their numbers for looks and performance, but it does affect the placement in the top 100. I have no idea how TER is doing it, but the original top 100 lists were all based on straight math. Somehow, now they have chemistry and Location star ratings in conjunction with the number scores that affect overall ratings. Who knows what formula they are using? 🙁
Also, how does it affect providers not in the top 100? And how do you search for those ratings in a profile? (Or individual review?) I guess that was your original point. That you can't search for it. I know I have seen it (in a profile, not an individual review), like the example I had linked, but I don't have a way to search for it.

Read the subject line of the post linked below. It strongly implies overall score isn't affected.  

Chemistry is a required field in beta. Incall is not, for obvious reasons.