A provider in Atlanta, Blake Lovely, had her home broken into and all of her money and electronics stolen, including her laptop.  

Sorry she was robbed, but insurance should cover her losses. Home owners & renters insurance is mandatory. I have jewelry insurance too! Sentimental items can never be replaced.  

This post is so backhanded shady.  

about the need for safeguards like strong, unique passwords and full disk encryption (which is available built into most modern computers, or as an add-on).

has their whole website password protected.  We can't even browse the photos to see if we're interested without providing some personal information.  People who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.

My house isn't glass, its BRICK.  Which is why I keep everything behind a log in.

An NDA doesn't help at all if information is compromised because a third party has it.  I think you are confused on what a NDA is.

Her client list certainly may not be safe.

2KG is a responsible agency that participates in TER.  They have an Agency Profile here where you can browse the profiles of their providers to see if you're interested without providing some personal information.  They have reviews of their girls going back seven years.

yet I can find one K-agency on the very first page of the agency listing. At least one other on the 2nd page. So much for attention to detail.

to keep your girls from being reviewed?  TER generally doesn't allow reviews of ladies whose photo galleries are not accessible to the general public.  That's why HX is banned and P411 had to revise their ad platform to allow a publicly accessible page with photos for each girl who has reviews.  Unless there has been a change in their policy recently, how are you able to get your girls reviewed?  Or do you not want them reviewed?

Kgirl agency ads are open to anyone to look at.  ONE Kgirl agency tried password protection a few years ago and then, suddenly, all of the reviews for girls from that agency came down.  Kgirl agencies themselves may not participate on TER, but I can guarantee you they give a shit about TER, and THAT'S why they follow the rules on making their websites accessible to the general public so that reviewers can link the ads to the reviews.  So, as you put it, to contrast 2KG with Kgirl agencies, the Kgirl agencies follow the TER rules on accessible websites and 2KG doesn't.  Many agencies, Kgirl and otherwise, that USED to require membership and a password for access have either changed their website to be open to the public or they are gone from TER.  If this guy is not following TER rules, and access to their website requires a password, do you want to report them or should I?   You are known for writing excellent problem reports that get results, so I will defer to you if you say you will do it.  Otherwise, I will do it myself.  

But your silliness is on display for all.  

I have been around for so long - you can see the recent reviews left and the ones going back years.  I absolutely have no problems with reviews.  I think it is important for people.  We never ask for them but have no issue at all.

because literally anyone could be hacked, which would be easier than trying to get through a PW protected laptop...but here you are "suggesting" the clients that have seen Blake should be concerned because her LT was stolen, all the while not knowing what safe guards she had in place.  

Thank you so much for your lovely words!

confirming mongers should not provide personal information in order to rent pussy.  As you say, "anyone could be hacked" and I would think that for hackers, customers involved in illegal prostitution would represent a financial opportunity if you can get ahold of a sex workers client list with detailed info about the customers.  If all she has is a first name and a burner phone number, no harm can be done to the customers by hackers.

you are more than likely to get low quality high volume pussy.

from within the last 60 days.  I have been using only references for the last 14 years and only occasionally do I get a girl where that is not enough.  The refs I use almost always come through for me, so most of the time, I get to see whoever I want.  Sorry if I did not explain fully.  I was talking about the information I will give them about myself.  That is my burner hobby phone, and my first name.  If that and the refs aren't good enough, then I will draw a line through her name and move on to the next name on my list.  

He didn't call out this provider though, so what's your concern here?

I don't know Golden_Hampster.
But they seem like they might be a provider.
Is that the case?

At least that's what the poster wants us to believe, yes.

an alias being used by an agency owner.  

You know something..... Y'all are giving the asshole thief ideas on what to do IF he has the info, and discovers this page/site.  

Many have tried.

The website you show should NOT be an allowed link for a review unless you can click through to the individual girl's web ad.  Merely having a list of names with no other info is not enough.  (I even posted this in the comments above that you responded to.) I don't know how this profile got through moderation unless it was already up before the agency started password protection.  There are still many reviews that went up when the link took you to a Kgirl's ad and have not come down after an agency goes to password protection.  Have you reported it?  If not, why?  You're supposed to be the guy clamping down on agencies, right?  Password protection has suppressed business every place it has been tried.  Maybe some orgs don't care if the reviews are accepted, or not.  

How am I missing the point?
I said exactly the same thing as you did.

review history, you will see that I have not reviewed a girl from the OC and SD locations you refer to in seven years (at that time, these two did not have Password protection), and I have not used CLL in over three years.  (As I recall, their attempt at PWP was fairly brief.)    I have only encountered PWP during periods I have used them at ca-kdolls, which I still use regularly, but PWP was during a brief period during 2018-2019 while TER was dark in the US, so it didn't matter anyway because reviews of US providers were not accepted while TER was dark in the US.  Time moves on, with or without you and me, so maybe it would behoove you to do a little research on which agencies I am active with before you start calling me a liar.  It's reckless and does more to damage your own cred than to hurt me when ANYONE can see I haven't seen girls at three of these agencies in years.  If I'm not using a particular agency, how would I know about whether or not they are using PWP?  If they have recent reviews on TER, I must assume that they do not use PWP, so I thought YOU were lying when you claimed it above, but my response is to not call you a liar, but instead check the veracity of your statements, and you were correct, they seem to be getting reviews approved while still maintaining PWP.  

circumventing the rule that requires a clickable link.  You are not using your own password-protected website as the ad platform for the girls you represent.  Their ad links are to other ad platforms like foxylists, tryst, etc., that are NOT password protected.  This means that if the girl is booked through another ad platform, you are essentially cut out of the commission, right?

I really don't care which agencies you were active in.

a special point of bringing this agency to my attention.  It was your find, and you constantly spin yourself as being the guy mongers can count on to bring agencies into line, so I'm not going steal your thunder or step on your toes to report them UNLESS you just go ahead and admit publicly that you are all talk and no action and don't have the balls to do it, at which point I would be happy to step in and affirm that you are a lot of hot air and just do it myself.  Of course, what a hypocrite that would make you, right?  So how about it?  You found it, so are you more than talk, or not? This is your chance to prove your whole persona here is not phony and that you are REALLY the monger friend you claim to be.  

Of course I'll do it. What balls does reporting this shit require?  
It's a pleasure for me to report the same agency owned by an asshat who keeps telling people to not give low scores or they'll be banned.  

I said there was only one using password protection at the time I was using them.  As a low-volume monger, you have no concept of what it's like to see 70-80 different providers a year and then try to remember something like whether or not I needed a password at a particular agency SEVEN years ago.  I cannot dispute your claim, but I HAVE NO PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE to confirm it either.  If you spent as much time fucking providers as you do trying to stir shit up on this board, you might be both better informed about the business and a little more mellow.  You have my response.  If you don't like it, GFY.  You are small potatoes here, as your review history shows.  

It's true Rocket has only 29 reviews but perhaps he doesn't review every girl he sees? That's true for a lot of us. In my case, for example, I've seen at least 100 girls in Costa Rica, and Panama but I can't review any of them here for obvious reasons. But I'm still well informed about the business down there (I was in Jaco, CR, as recently as March) and am happy to share advice.
Also, you may have explained this in the past and I don't place any pejorative suggestion by asking, but why is your newest review last December? What made you stop reviewing? It doesn't sound like you've stopped seeing K-Girls. I was expecting to see more recent reviews and surprised when they simply stopped around the end of last year.

He has a long-standing history of reposting info on TER that he has merely READ on other fuckboards and end up not being from his own personal experience.  Whether his number of reviews over 3 years is 29, 39, 0r 49 is irrelevant.  He posts of lot of info about Kgirls on the Kgirl board that is not anything but hearsay.  In fact, I called him out there today for recommending a girl he was not reviewed.  I asked him why he didn't review her if he saw you, and we'll see what lame excuse he comes up with this time. If you can talk about her service using your username, why can't he review her?  THAT'S an excellent question, too.   He's openly referred to as our troll on the Kgirl board by MANY members, not just me.  

I assume she knows you also fuck K-hookers. If so, may a suggest an FMF?

and said I may know someone who would be happy to do it.  She said SHE would rather pick the woman so that it's someone "new" for me.  She also said if SHE gets someone she knows, I won't have to pay anyone.  What a selfless attitude, right?  Lol

A well rounded education requires learning from a variety of sources and teachers with different viewpoints and backgrounds. When she is finished learning the basics, send her to Boston, a world renowned center of higher education, for more advanced training, tuition free.  
.
I will include a supply of free notebooks:
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/porn-stars-23/brilliant-topflight-product-placement-back-to-school-shopping-198824

but there is nothing she can learn in Boston that she can't learn in SoCal.  I would argue that, from a professorial perspective, there were a wider range of study subjects here from which to acquire knowledge in the first place.  Lol

Maybe there should be a Rate My Professor http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RateMyProfessors.com category for this.  
.
"I took the intro course from XXX who insisted that his way was the best and only way to learn the material. Meh. It was OK but I felt that something was lacking. Then I took the advanced course from xxxxxxxx and it was so much better! He taught me new ways of thinking about the subject matter and the world.  He was very patient and extremely helpful with the homework assignments. Sometimes his explanations could be quite lengthy but the content was always spot on. If you have the attention span of a fruit fly, stay with XXX and the intro course. If you have a thirst for knowledge, take the advanced course with xxxxxxxx."
.
Why not let her decide?

Sounds like you two are having a bit of fun with each other in this little discussion, but I was actually reminded of my initial experiences, and hope you don’t mind me sharing…